Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the experience with telemedicine in patients with cognitive impairments and their caregivers. Methods: We conducted a survey-based study of patients who completed neurological consultation via video link between January and April 2022. Results: A total of 62 eligible neurological video consultations were conducted for the following categories of patients: Alzheimer’s disease (33.87%), amnesic mild cognitive impairment (24.19%), frontotemporal dementia (17.74%), Lewy body dementia (4.84%), mixed dementia (3.23%), subjective memory disorders (12.90%), non-amnesic mild cognitive impairment (1.61%), and multiple system atrophy (1.61%). The survey was successfully completed by 87.10% of the caregivers and directly by the patients in 12.90% of cases. Our data showed positive feedback regarding the telemedicine experience; both caregivers and patients reported that they found neurological video consultation useful (caregivers: 87.04%, ‘very useful’; patients: 87.50%, ‘very useful’) and were satisfied overall (caregivers: 90.74%, ‘very satisfied’; patients: 100%, ‘very satisfied’). Finally, all caregivers (100%) agreed that neurological video consultation was a useful tool to reduce their burden (Visual Analogue Scale mean ± SD: 8.56 ± 0.69). Conclusions: Telemedicine is well received by patients and their caregivers. However, successful delivery incorporates support from staff and care partners to navigate technologies. The exclusion of older adults with cognitive impairment in developing telemedicine systems may further exacerbate access to care in this population. Adapting technologies to the needs of patients and their caregivers is critical for the advancement of accessible dementia care through telemedicine.

Traditionally, medical care and research in Parkinson’s disease (PD) have been conducted through in-person visit. The recent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly impacted the delivery of in-person clinical care. We conducted an online survey to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on access to telehealth care, interviewing both PD patients and neurologists. Survey responses were collected from 1 March to 31 May 2021 through an anonymous, self-reported questionnaire, on the ‘Qualtrics’ platform. In total, 197 patients and 42 neurologists completed the survey. In our sample, 37.56% of PD patients and 88.10% of neurologists reported having used alternatives to in-person visits, while 13.70% of PD patients and 40.48% of neurologists used telemedicine. Data showed that respondents were generally satisfied with the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. The relational dimension between patient and neurologist seems to be the factor that most positively affected the telemedicine experience, contributing greatly to a more patient-centred care. Current findings suggest the need to improve the access to telehealth services for patients with PD. The technology has the potential to improve the care of frail patients, especially when availability of face-to-face visits is limited.

Background/Objectives: High cognitive reserve (CR) has been shown to have beneficial effects on global cognition, cognitive decline, and risk of dementia in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We evaluated the influence of CR on the long-term cognitive outcomes of patients with PD who underwent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Methods: Twenty-five patients with PD underwent neuropsychological screening using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline, 1 year, and 5 years after bilateral STN-DBS. CR was assessed using the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire. According to CR score, patients were assigned to two different groups (LowCR group ≤ 130, HighCR group > 130). Results: Our data showed that patients in the HighCR group obtained a better performance with the MoCA total score at long-term follow-up compared to those in the LowCR group ([mean ± SE] LowCR group: 21.4 ± 1.2 vs. HighCR group: 24.5 ± 1.3, p = 0.05). The cognitive profile of the HighCR group remained unchanged over time. Conversely, the LowCR group had worse global cognition 5 years after surgery (T0: 25.3 ± 0.6 vs. T2: 21.4 ± 1.2, p = 0.02). Cognitive decline was not associated with mood, demographics, or clinical variables. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that higher CR may be protective in PD cognition after STN-DBS. Specifically, a high CR may help cope with long-term decline in the context of surgical treatment. Quantifying a patient’s CR could lead to more personalized medical care, tailoring postoperative support and monitoring for those at higher risk of cognitive decline.

We aimed to evaluate epidemiology, seizure type, EEG, and etiology of neonatal seizures (NS) in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Data on infants with a neurophysiological confirmation of NS were collected between 2009 and 2022. Seizure types and epileptic syndromes were classified by the ILAE classification and EEG by the Italian Neonatal Seizure Collaborative Network (INNESCO) score. Out of 91,253 neonates, 145 presented with NS; 69.7 % were born at term and 30.3 % were preterm infants. The incidence of NS in neonates born at our center was 1.2 per 1,000 live newborns (96/80697 neonates) while in the entire neonatal population admitted to our center it was 1.6 per 1,000 live births, increasing with lower preterm age. Compared to previous studies, we found a lower proportion of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (23.4 %) and a higher rate of genetic contribution (26.2 %). The infection rate was higher in preterm (31.8 %) than in full term (9.9 %) infants. Electrographic seizures were associated with acute provoked seizures (35.9 %), preterm age (52.3 %), and HIE (52.9 %). Vascular etiology was associated with focal clonic seizures (56.8 %). Non-structural neonatal genetic epilepsy was associated with sequential seizures (68.2 %), particularly KCNQ2 and SCN2A epilepsy. Background EEG was abnormal in all HIE, infections (85.7 %) and metabolic NS (83.3 %). In genetic epilepsy, background EEG depended on the epileptic syndrome: normal in 80 % of self-limited neonatal epilepsy and abnormal in 77.8 % of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Electroclinical seizures were associated with focal onset, while electrographic seizures correlated with a multifocal onset. A low incidence of HIE and a high incidence of genetic etiology were observed in our cohort of NS. Seizure type and EEG features are fundamental to address etiology.

The onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) represents the greatest long-term challenge in lung transplantation (LT). Here we aimed to identify early molecular signals of CLAD by analyzing the effects of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) on airway cells and validating these findings in patient lung tissues. In our BAL biobank, we identified 13 LT patients with a BAL sample at CLAD diagnosis and 13 patients with a stable graft function and a BAL sample obtained at least 12 months post LT (Ctrl). All patients were then followed for at least 18 months. EVs were isolated, immunophenotyped, and co-cultured with airway cells. The cells’ transcriptome and proteome were profiled. Selected targets were validated by immunohistochemistry. Logistic regression and survival analyses were performed for prediction of CLAD progression. During follow-up, 7 CLAD patients experienced allograft dysfunction aggravation, and one control developed CLAD. CLAD patients showed more EVs originating from epithelial cells and leukocytes than stable LT recipients. Exposure of airway cells to CLAD-EVs led to the up-regulation of p70S6K and canonical NF-κB signaling, altering their intracellular and extracellular proteome. Activation of NF-κB was also detected at the onset of CLAD in transbronchial biopsies and BAL cytology, and it persisted throughout the progression to end-stage CLAD. RelA overexpression was associated with poorer graft performance and worse outcomes. RelA-driven NF-κB activation is a key factor in the development of CLAD by promoting persistent inflammation. This pathway may be a promising therapeutic target to improve long-term graft survival after LT.

Differentiating between primary and secondary headaches can be challenging, especially in the emergency department (ED). Since symptoms alone are inadequate criteria for distinguishing between primary and secondary headaches, many children with headaches undergo neuroimaging investigations, such as brain CT and MRI. In various studies, the frequency of neuroimaging utilization is influenced by several factors, including teaching status, ownership, metropolitan area, insurance status, and ethnicity of patients. However, only a few studies have considered the role of specialist consultations in ordering neuroimaging studies on childhood headaches. We report the contributions of different specialists to the evaluation of children with headaches admitted to the ED and their influence on neuroimaging decisions. We retrospectively reviewed the medical reports of paediatric patients who presented with headaches to the paediatric ED of the Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milano between January 2017 and January 2022. Overall, 890 children with headaches were evaluated (mean age: 10.0 years; range: 1 to 17 years). All patients were examined by the ED paediatricians, while specialist consultations were required for 261 patients, including 240 neurological (92.0%), 46 ophthalmological (17.6%), and 20 otorhinolaryngological (7.7%) consultations. Overall, 173 neuroimaging examinations were required, of which 51.4 and 48.6% were ordered by paediatricians and neurologists, respectively. In particular, paediatricians required 61.4% of brain CT scans, and neurologists required 92.0% of brain MRI scans. In conclusion, paediatricians were responsible for the management of most children with headaches admitted to the ED, while specialist consultations were required only in about a third of the cases. Although there was no significant difference in the number of neuroimaging studies ordered by specialists, brain CT scans were most often used by paediatricians, and MRI scans by neurologists.