Pancreatic cancer (PC) has the highest frequency of developing cancer cachexia (CC)–sarcopenia (SC) syndrome, which negatively influences patients’ outcome, quality of life, and tolerance/response to treatments. However, the clinical impacts of CC, SC, and their associated factors on outcomes for advanced PC has yet to be fully investigated. A total of 232 patients were enrolled in this study for the retrospective review of their clinical information and the measurement of skeletal muscle areas at the third lumber vertebra by computed tomography scan to identify CC or SC. The association and concurrent occurrence of clinicopathological features in each patient, prevalence rates, and prognosis with the CC or SC were calculated. CC and SC were observed in 83.6% (n = 194) and 49.1% (n = 114) of PC patients, respectively. Low hemoglobin levels more often occurred in CC patients than in non-CC patients (p = 0.014). Older age (p = 0.000), female gender (p = 0.024), low body mass index (BMI) values (p = 0.004), low hemoglobin levels (p = 0.036), and low albumin levels (p = 0.001) were more often found in SC patients than in non-SC patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that CC was an independent poor prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for all patients, the chemotherapy (C/T) subgroup, and the high BMI subgroup. Meanwhile, SC was an independent predictor of poor OS for the subgroups of C/T or high BMI but not for all patients. These findings reveal the clinical differences for CC and SC and provide useful information for predicting the prognosis of advanced PC patients and conducting personalized medicine.

Purpose: Modified gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) is an active regimen for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) in our previous study. Herein, we report the results of a single-arm phase II of nivolumab plus modified GS (NGS) as first-line treatment in ABTC. Patients and Methods: Patients received nivolumab 240 mg and 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1 plus daily 80/100/120 mg of S-1 (based on body surface area) on days 1 to 10, in a 2-week cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The correlation between therapeutic efficacy and genetic alterations with signatures identified by targeted next-generation sequencing panels was explored. Results: Between December 2019 and December 2020, 48 eligible patients were enrolled. After a median of 17.6 months of follow-up, the ORR was 45.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.4%–60.8%]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 9.1 (95% CI, 5.8–9.6) and 19.2 (95% CI, 11.6–not reached) months, respectively. All grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) were less than 10%, except fatigue (14.6%) and skin rash (10.4%). Eighteen patients (35.4%) experienced immune-related AEs without treatment-related death. High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H; top 20%; ≥7.1 mut/Mb) only predicted prolonged median PFS but not OS. Up to 28.9% of patients who harbored loss-of-function mutations in chromatin remodeling genes demonstrated significantly longer median PFS and OS than those without alterations. Conclusions: NGS is a safe and promising regimen in ABTC. Impaired functions of chromatin remodeling genes may be a potential surrogate biomarker with predictive value in this study.

Background: Upfront resection (UR) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer. There is increasing evidence suggesting favourable outcomes toward neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery. Methods: All clinical staging with resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated at a tertiary medical centre from 2013 to 2020 were identified. The baseline characteristics, treatment course, surgery outcome and survival results of UR or NAC were compared. Results: Finally, in 159 resectable patients, 46 patients (29%) underwent NAC and 113 patients (71%) received UR. In NAC, 11 patients (24%) did not receive resection, 4 (36.4%) for comorbidity, 2 (18.2%) for patient refusal and 2 (18.2%) for disease progression. In UR, 13 patients (12%) were unresectable intraoperatively; 6 (46.2%) for locally advanced and 5 (38.5%) for distant metastasis. Overall, 97% of patients in NAC and 58% of patients in UR completed adjuvant chemotherapy. As of data cut-off, 24 patients (69%) in NAC and 42 patients (29%) in UR were still tumour free. The median recurrence-free survival in NAC, UR with adjuvant chemotherapy and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 31.3 months (95% CI, 14.4–not estimable), 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.0–14.3) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.8–11.8), P=0.036; and the median overall survival in each group were not reached (95% CI, 29.7–not estimable), 25.9 months (95% CI, 21.1–40.5) and 21.7 months (12.0–32.8), P=0.0053. Based on initial clinical staging, the median overall survival of NAC was not significantly different from UR with a tumour less than or equal to 2 cm, P=0.29. NAC patients had a higher R0 resection rate (83% versus 53%), lower recurrence rate (31% versus 71%) and harvested median number lymph node (23 versus 15). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that NAC is superior to UR in resectable pancreatic cancer with better survival.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FL) is indicated after progression on gemcitabine-based therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, salvage therapy after nal-IRI/FL failure remains to be established. This study included 260 consecutive patients who initiated nal-IRI/FL therapy reimbursed by the National Health Insurance of Taiwan between January 2019 and March 2023. All patients were stratified into three groups (adding-on, regimen-shifting, and supportive) according to their strategy for nal-IRI/FL treatment. The prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the median overall survival (OS) between the adding-on oxaliplatin or nab-paclitaxel and regimen-shifting groups following treatment failure with nal-IRI/FL. The median OS after the initiation of nal-IRI/FL was 7.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-10.5) months and 6.1 (95% CI, 5.3-6.9) months for the adding-on oxaliplatin or nab-paclitaxel and regimen-shifting groups, respectively (P = 0.035). An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1, no peritoneal metastasis before nal-IRI/FL, and the addition of oxaliplatin or nab-paclitaxel were significant independent prognostic factors for OS after nal-IRI/FL initiation. After PSM, the median OS after adding-on oxaliplatin/nab-paclitaxel or shifting regimens following the treatment failure of nal-IRI/FL were 4.1 (95% CI, 3.5-4.7) months and 3.1 (95% CI, 1.7-4.5) months, respectively (P = 0.039). Addition of oxaliplatin or nab-paclitaxel to nal-IRI/FL was significantly associated with a better OS than regimen shifting after progression on nal-IRI/FL in patients with metastatic PDAC.

Purpose:Modified gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) is an active regimen for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) in our previous study. Herein, we report the results of a single-arm phase II of nivolumab plus modified GS (NGS) as first-line treatment in ABTC.Patients and Methods:Patients received nivolumab 240 mg and 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1 plus daily 80/100/120 mg of S-1 (based on body surface area) on days 1 to 10, in a 2-week cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The correlation between therapeutic efficacy and genetic alterations with signatures identified by targeted next-generation sequencing panels was explored.Results:Between December 2019 and December 2020, 48 eligible patients were enrolled. After a median of 17.6 months of follow-up, the ORR was 45.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.4%–60.8%]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 9.1 (95% CI, 5.8–9.6) and 19.2 (95% CI, 11.6–not reached) months, respectively. All grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) were less than 10%, except fatigue (14.6%) and skin rash (10.4%). Eighteen patients (35.4%) experienced immune-related AEs without treatment-related death. High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H; top 20%; ≥7.1 mut/Mb) only predicted prolonged median PFS but not OS. Up to 28.9% of patients who harbored loss-of-function mutations in chromatin remodeling genes demonstrated significantly longer median PFS and OS than those without alterations.Conclusions:NGS is a safe and promising regimen in ABTC. Impaired functions of chromatin remodeling genes may be a potential surrogate biomarker with predictive value in this study.