Artificial intelligence can be used to realise new types of protective devices and assistance systems, so their importance for occupational safety and health is continuously increasing. However, established risk mitigation measures in software development are only partially suitable for applications in AI systems, which only create new sources of risk. Risk management for systems that for systems using AI must therefore be adapted to the new problems. This work objects to contribute hereto by identifying relevant sources of risk for AI systems. For this purpose, the differences between AI systems, especially those based on modern machine learning methods, and classical software were analysed, and the current research fields of trustworthy AI were evaluated. On this basis, a taxonomy could be created that provides an overview of various AI-specific sources of risk. These new sources of risk should be taken into account in the overall risk assessment of a system based on AI technologies, examined for their criticality and managed accordingly at an early stage to prevent a later system failure.

Slips, trips, and falls (STFs) are a major occupational hazard that contributes significantly to workplace injuries and the associated financial costs. The application of traditional fall detection techniques in the real world is limited because they are usually based on simulated falls. By using kinematic data from real near-fall incidents that occurred in physically demanding work environments, this study overcomes this limitation and improves the ecological validity of fall detection algorithms. This study systematically tests several machine-learning architectures for near-fall detection using the Prev-Fall dataset, which consists of high-resolution inertial measurement unit (IMU) data from 110 workers. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), residual networks (ResNets), convolutional long short-term memory networks (convLSTMs), and InceptionTime models were trained and evaluated over a range of temporal window lengths using a neural architecture search. High-validation F1 scores were achieved by the best-performing models, particularly CNNs and InceptionTime, indicating their effectiveness in near-fall classification. The need for more contextual variables to increase robustness was highlighted by recurrent false positives found in subsequent tests on previously unobserved occupational data, especially during biomechanically demanding activities such as bending and squatting. Nevertheless, our findings suggest the applicability of machine-learning-based STF prevention systems for workplace safety monitoring and, more generally, applications in fall mitigation. To further improve the accuracy and generalizability of the system, future research should investigate multimodal data integration and improved classification techniques.

The ISO 3382-3 standard uses the measurable sound pressure based parameters D 2,S and L p,A,S,4 m to describe the acoustic properties of open-plan offices. As yet however, no treatment of the measurement uncertainty of these parameters according to the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) is to be found in the peer-reviewed literature. This technical note therefore describes how the measurement uncertainty can be declared according to GUM. The mathematical framework presented here can be used and expanded by other laboratories to derive their own uncertainty estimates. It is also applied in this document to 44 measurements yielding combined uncertainties for D 2,S of 0.55 dB ≤ ≤ 0.67 dB and for L p,A,S,4 m of 0.19 dB ≤ ≤ 0.83 dB. The implications of this result are discussed with regard to limit values in technical regulations.

Slip, trip, and fall (STF) accidents cause high rates of absence from work in many companies. During the 2022 reporting period, the German Social Accident Insurance recorded 165,420 STF accidents, of which 12 were fatal and 2485 led to disability pensions. Particularly in the traffic, transport and logistics sector, STF accidents are the most frequently reported occupational accidents. Therefore, an accurate detection of near-falls is critical to improve worker safety. Efficient detection algorithms are essential for this, but their performance heavily depends on large, well-curated datasets. However, there are drawbacks to current datasets, including small sample sizes, an emphasis on older demographics, and a reliance on simulated rather than real data. In this paper we report the collection of a standardised kinematic STF dataset from real-world STF events affecting parcel delivery workers and steelworkers. We further discuss the use of the data to evaluate dynamic stability control during locomotion for machine learning and build a standardised database. We present the data collection, discuss the classification of the data, present the totality of the data statistically, and compare it with existing databases. A significant research gap is the limited number of participants and focus on older populations in previous studies, as well as the reliance on simulated rather than real-world data. Our study addresses these gaps by providing a larger dataset of real-world STF events from a working population with physically demanding jobs. The population studied included 110 participants, consisting of 55 parcel delivery drivers and 55 steelworkers, both male and female, aged between 19 and 63 years. This diverse participant base allows for a more comprehensive understanding of STF incidents in different working environments.

The last years have seen an acceleration in the development and uptake of artificial intelligence (AI) systems by “early adopter” hospitals, caught between the pressures to “perform” and “transform” in a struggling health care system. This transformation has raised concerns among health care providers as their voices and location-specific workflows have often been overlooked, resulting in technologies that fail to integrate meaningfully into routine care and worsen rather than improve care processes. How can positive AI implementation be carried out in health care, aligned with European values? Based on a perspective that spans all stakeholders, we have created EURAID (European Responsible AI Development), a practical, human-centric framework for AI development and implementation based on agreed goals and values. We illustrate this approach through the co-development of a narrow-purpose “in-house” AI system, designed to help bridge the AI implementation gap in real-world clinical settings. This example is then expanded to address the broader challenges associated with complex, multiagent AI systems. By portraying all key stakeholders across the AI development life cycle and highlighting their roles and contributions within the process, real use cases, and methods for achieving iterative consensus, we offer a unique practical approach for safe and fast progress in hospital digital transformation in the AI age.