Background and objectives: Data on long-term cardiometabolic consequences in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) are controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate body mass index (BMI), body composition, blood pressure (BP) and insulin sensitivity in adolescents and young adults with CAH in comparison with healthy controls. Methods: Thirty-two patients with classical CAH (13 males; mean of age 26.0 ± 7.1, years (14.0–37.3) were compared to 32 healthy sex and age-matched controls (13 males; mean of age 28.7 ± 4.6 years (14.1–37.2), p = 0.13). Body composition was evaluated in all subjects with DXA (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA). Elevated BP was defined as BP > 95th percentile in adolescents, and >140/90 mmHg in adults. Comparisons between the two groups were adjusted for age, gender, pubertal stage and height. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed, and fasting insulin levels were evaluated. Insulin sensitivity was determined using a homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR). Results: The median BMI was significantly higher in subjects with CAH (1.63 (0.3–2.4) SDS and 0.41 (−0.63–1.19) SDS, respectively, p < 0.001). Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in grams was significantly higher in CAH females versus control females (467 (231–561) vs. 226 (164–295), p = 0.002). Elevated BP was identified in 34% of CAH patients (nine SW and two SV) and 12.5% (n = 4) of controls (p = 0.038). Impaired fasting glycemia was detected in one SW CAH patient and impaired glucose tolerance in three SV CAH patients; normal glucose tolerance was found in all controls. A strong positive correlation was found between median cumulative hydrocortisone (HC) dose equivalents and LDL-cholesterol and a negative association with lean body mass (r = −0.79, p = 0.036) in females with CAH. BMI, VAT, BP and HOMA-IR were not related to median cumulative HC dose equivalents. Conclusions: CAH patients had higher BMI, VAT and frequency of elevated BP compared to controls. Doses of glucocorticoids were related directly to LDL-cholesterol and inversely to lean body mass in CAH females, but not associated with body composition, insulin sensitivity and BP in the whole cohort of CAH patients.

Background and Objectives: The main reason for Newborn screening (NBS) for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is to prevent adrenal insufficiency that can lead to life-threatening conditions. On the other hand, screening programs are not always sensitive and effective enough to detect the disease. We aimed to evaluate impact of the national NBS on the clinical presentation of patients with CAH in Lithuania. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed on data of 88 patients with CAH from 1989 to 2020. Patients with confirmed CAH were divided into two groups: (1) 75 patients diagnosed before NBS: 52 cases with salt-wasting (SW), 21 with simple virilising (SV) and two with non-classical (NC) form; (2) 13 patients diagnosed with NBS: 12 cases with SW and 1 case with SV form. For the evaluation of NBS effectiveness, data of only male infants with salt-wasting CAH were analysed (n = 36, 25 unscreened and nine screened). Data on gestational age, birth weight, weight, symptoms, and laboratory tests (serum potassium and sodium levels) on the day of diagnosis, were analysed. Results: A total of 158,486 neonates were screened for CAH from 2015 to 2020 in Lithuania and CAH was confirmed in 13 patients (12 SW, one–SV form), no false negative cases were found. The sensitivity and specificity of NBS program for classical CAH forms were 100%; however, positive predictive value was only 4%. There were no significant differences between unscreened and screened male infant groups in terms of age at diagnosis, serum potassium, and serum sodium levels. Significant differences were found in weight at diagnosis between the groups (−1.67 ± 1.12 SDS versus 0.046 ± 1.01 SDS of unscreened and screened patients respectively, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of NBS for CAH program were 100%, but positive predictive value—only 4%. Weight loss was significantly lower and the weight SDS at diagnosis was significantly higher in the group of screened patients.