The pandemic raised a discussion about the postponement of medical interventions for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the characteristics of pretreatment diagnostic assessment in the pandemic and the influence of diagnostic assessment on outcomes. A total of 96 patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for NSCLC were included. The number of patients increased from mean 0.9 (2012–2019) to 1.45 per month in the COVID era (p < 0.05). Pandemic-related factors (contact reduction, limited intensive care unit resources) might have influenced clinical decision making towards SBRT. The time from pretreatment assessment (multidisciplinary tumor board decision, bronchoscopy, planning CT) to SBRT was longer during the COVID period (p < 0.05). Reduced services, staff shortage, or appointment management to mitigate infection risks might explain this finding. Overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional progression-free survival, and distant progression-free survival were superior in patients who received a PET/CT scan prior to SBRT (p < 0.05). This supports that SBRT guidelines advocate the acquisition of a PET/CT scan. A longer time from PET/CT scan/conventional staging to SBRT (<10 vs. ≥10 weeks) was associated with worse locoregional control (p < 0.05). The postponement of diagnostic or therapeutic measures in the pandemic should be discussed cautiously. Patient- and tumor-related features should be evaluated in detail.

Purpose: Financial toxicity (FT) associated with cancer and its treatment has become increasingly important. This study investigated factors associated with the development of FT during radiation therapy (RT). SOCOFIN was the first longitudinal prospective study to systematically evaluate FT in the context of RT. Methods: Financial toxicity was measured with the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST-12) at RT initiation, completion, and at 3 months afterwards. Secondary endpoints included socioeconomic factors, health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), depression (PHQ-9), coping mechanisms, and sense of coherence. The data were collected digitally; missing data were estimated using multiple imputation with chained equations. Results: Between July 2023 and June 2024, 230 patients were recruited. Analyses were performed on 170 records. During RT, FT did not increase; a slight overall decrease was descriptively observed. Of seven tumor groups, the highest difference in FT at baseline was measured between prostate (median 33) and pelvic cancer patients (median 19), reaching statistical significance (Kruskal–Wallis test, p = 0.01). Nonetheless, tumor entity was not found to be a significant predictor of FT following RT in multivariate linear regression models. While factors associated with FT differed between timepoints, financial difficulties at baseline predicted the occurrence of FT most strongly ( p < 10 ⁻¹³ ) and persistently. Conclusion: Predictors of FT were predominantly socioeconomic, such as baseline financial difficulties, net income, employment stability, and sense of coherence, which superseded tumor- or treatment-specific variables. The findings of this study underscore the necessity of multifactorial, early screening before RT to mitigate FT among radiation oncology patients.

Background: The abscopal effect (AbE) refers to the regression of non-irradiated tumors following localized radiotherapy (RT), suggesting a systemic immune-mediated response. The combination of RT with immunotherapy (IO) has been proposed to enhance the AbE by overcoming RT-induced immunosuppressive mechanisms, but robust evidence, specifically in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is lacking. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of the AbE and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic lung cancer patients receiving RT and IO. Materials and methods: We analyzed consecutive metastatic lung cancer patients who received IO at a certified lung cancer center in Germany between 2009 and 2021. Inclusion required RT to at least one lesion and at least one measurable non-irradiated lesion. The AbE was defined as radiological regression of a non-irradiated lesion following RT. PFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox regression models. Factors influencing survival, such as RT site selection and IO duration, were assessed in univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: A total of 72 patients were included. The AbE was observed in 9.3% (n = 7). While the AbE was significantly associated with prolonged PFS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19–0.92, p = 0.03), it did not significantly impact OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.30–1.64, p = 0.41). In contrast, RT to the primary tumor (HR = 0.16, p = 0.004) and longer IO duration (HR = 0.83, p = 0.001) were strong predictors of improved OS. Conclusion: While the AbE remains an intriguing phenomenon, its occurrence was rare and not significantly associated with OS. Strategic RT site selection and optimized treatment sequencing were more strongly linked to improved survival outcomes, highlighting the need for refined radioimmunotherapy strategies.

Identification of the optimal treatment strategy is challenging in elderly with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Concurrent chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin represents an option for elderly. Outcomes (1) in elderly (≥70 years, n = 158) vs. younger patients (n = 188) and (2), independently of age, in definitive radiochemotherapy, with low-dose cisplatin (n = 125) vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine (n = 76) were studied. Elderly included more males, had a lower Karnofsky index, more comorbidities, and lower stages. Low-dose cisplatin patients (vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine) had higher age, more comorbidities, and lower stages. We observed reduced dermatitis and dysphagia and increased anemia and thrombocytopenia in elderly vs. younger patients, without increased ≥grade 3 toxicities. Low-dose cisplatin was less toxic than cisplatin/vinorelbine. Survival outcomes were lower in elderly vs. younger and comparable between low-dose cisplatin and cisplatin/vinorelbine. In elderly, gender, Karnofsky index, stage, and multimodal treatment (including additional surgery/systemic therapy) were identified as prognostic factors. In conclusion, we found evidence for an acceptable toxicity profile and the need for improvement of outcomes in elderly with localized NSCLC. Multimodal strategies (including additional surgery/systemic treatment) showed favorable outcomes and should be reasonably considered in elderly who are deemed fit enough. Low-dose cisplatin should be discussed on an individual basis due to favorable toxicity and outcomes.

The internal organ at risk volume (IRV) concept might improve toxicity profiles in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied (1) clinical aspects in central vs. peripheral tumors, (2) the IRV concept in central tumors, (3) organ motion, and (4) associated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). We analyzed patients who received SBRT for NSCLC (clinical aspects, n = 78; motion management, n = 35). We found lower biologically effective doses, larger planning target volume sizes, higher lung doses, and worse locoregional control for central vs. peripheral tumors. Organ motion was greater in males and tall patients (bronchial tree), whereas volume changes were lower in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (esophagus). Applying the IRV concept (retrospectively, without new optimization), we found an absolute increase of >10% in NTCPs for the bronchial tree in three patients. This study emphasizes the need to optimize methods to balance dose escalation with toxicities in central tumors. There is evidence that organ motion/volume changes could be more pronounced in males and tall patients, and less pronounced in patients with higher BMI. Since recent studies have made efforts to further subclassify central tumors to refine treatment, the IRV concept should be considered for optimal risk assessment.

In this study, we investigated the outcomes and factors influencing treatment efficacy in 93 patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), with a median age of 64 years. We focused on the impact of chemotherapy regimens, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), and patient-related variables. The median follow-up for OS was 17.3 months. We observed a statistically significant difference in PFS between LD-SCLC patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide (EP) and those treated with carboplatin and etoposide (CP) (PFS: EP 13.63 months vs. CP 6.54 months, p < 0.01). Patients treated with EP had better overall survival (OS) than CP-treated patients (OS: EP 26.9 months vs. CP 16.16 months, p < 0.01). Concomitant chemotherapy was associated with improved PFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.002). Patients receiving PCI showed superior OS (p = 0.05) and a trend towards improved PFS (p = 0.057). Female gender was associated with better OS (p = 0.025). Most patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (71%). This real-world study underscores the importance of multidisciplinary LD-SCLC management, emphasizing the roles of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and PCI. These findings inform personalized treatment strategies and emphasize the need for prospective trials to validate these results and optimize LD-SCLC treatment.