The pandemic raised a discussion about the postponement of medical interventions for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the characteristics of pretreatment diagnostic assessment in the pandemic and the influence of diagnostic assessment on outcomes. A total of 96 patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for NSCLC were included. The number of patients increased from mean 0.9 (2012–2019) to 1.45 per month in the COVID era (p < 0.05). Pandemic-related factors (contact reduction, limited intensive care unit resources) might have influenced clinical decision making towards SBRT. The time from pretreatment assessment (multidisciplinary tumor board decision, bronchoscopy, planning CT) to SBRT was longer during the COVID period (p < 0.05). Reduced services, staff shortage, or appointment management to mitigate infection risks might explain this finding. Overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional progression-free survival, and distant progression-free survival were superior in patients who received a PET/CT scan prior to SBRT (p < 0.05). This supports that SBRT guidelines advocate the acquisition of a PET/CT scan. A longer time from PET/CT scan/conventional staging to SBRT (<10 vs. ≥10 weeks) was associated with worse locoregional control (p < 0.05). The postponement of diagnostic or therapeutic measures in the pandemic should be discussed cautiously. Patient- and tumor-related features should be evaluated in detail.

Identification of the optimal treatment strategy is challenging in elderly with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Concurrent chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin represents an option for elderly. Outcomes (1) in elderly (≥70 years, n = 158) vs. younger patients (n = 188) and (2), independently of age, in definitive radiochemotherapy, with low-dose cisplatin (n = 125) vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine (n = 76) were studied. Elderly included more males, had a lower Karnofsky index, more comorbidities, and lower stages. Low-dose cisplatin patients (vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine) had higher age, more comorbidities, and lower stages. We observed reduced dermatitis and dysphagia and increased anemia and thrombocytopenia in elderly vs. younger patients, without increased ≥grade 3 toxicities. Low-dose cisplatin was less toxic than cisplatin/vinorelbine. Survival outcomes were lower in elderly vs. younger and comparable between low-dose cisplatin and cisplatin/vinorelbine. In elderly, gender, Karnofsky index, stage, and multimodal treatment (including additional surgery/systemic therapy) were identified as prognostic factors. In conclusion, we found evidence for an acceptable toxicity profile and the need for improvement of outcomes in elderly with localized NSCLC. Multimodal strategies (including additional surgery/systemic treatment) showed favorable outcomes and should be reasonably considered in elderly who are deemed fit enough. Low-dose cisplatin should be discussed on an individual basis due to favorable toxicity and outcomes.

Diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) has traditionally marked a turning point in treatment goals and prognosis of patients with breast cancer (BC). However, new systemic treatment options have both prevented the development and improved the prognosis of BC patients with BM. Stereotactic radiotherapy techniques (SRT) have widely replaced whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with limited BM, yielding impressive survival at modest toxicity rates. However, based on established prognostic scores, many patients will not profit from modern SRT treatment concepts and, therefore, remain candidates for WBRT or best supportive care (BSC). Here, treatment decisions may be challenging. This study aims to describe clinical outcomes and explore potential prognostic factors in a single-center cohort of BC patients treated with WBRT comprising patients across the prognosis continuum reflecting everyday work routine. We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients diagnosed with BM who received WBRT between 2008 and 2020. The cohort included patients with a broad range of prognostic factors (≥ 60 years old, Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] ≤ 70, >3 BM and a Graded Prognostic Assessment [GPA] score < 1 [anticipated life expectancy of < 4 months]), who were either treated with palliative WBRT alone or in case of focal symptoms attributed to individual location of metastasis with surgery, SRT, or WBRT + focal dose escalation (“boost”). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and factors potentially affecting outcome were statistically assessed by the log-rank test. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression was used in survival analysis to estimate hazard ratios and to evaluate the influence of various variables on survival time. For all statistical procedures SPSS software (v. 26) was used. Median survival after diagnosis of BM was 4 months (95% CI 3–5 months). The most relevant negative prognostic factor within the group of GPA-classifiers was KPS (≤ 70), followed by the number of BM (>3). Metastasectomy displayed significantly improved survival in univariable analysis (log rank p = 0.008; Cox-Regression p = 0.018), but did not elicit as predictive for OS in multivariable analysis ( p = 0.47). Furthermore, completion of the prescribed RT series had the strongest impact on OS in both univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses ( p < 0.00001) while delivery of a radiation boost in addition to WBRT exerted no significant benefit (Cox regression p = 0.358). Despite the continuous development of effective treatment strategies for BM, BC patients who are ineligible for innovative treatment modalities show poor survival rates. Following prognostic assessment may help to make treatment decisions. KPS and number of BM may be most important in this context. In our retrospective cohort surgical removal of BM and completion of RT series were associated with improved prognosis, while focal radiation dose escalation in addition to WBRT was not.

Background/Objectives: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare but aggressive tumor, primarily affecting elderly patients. Radiotherapy (RT) remains an important treatment option, particularly for patients who are ineligible for systemic chemotherapy. This study aims to identify prognostic factors and evaluate recurrence patterns in a real-world cohort of PCNSL patients treated with RT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 64 PCNSL patients treated with radiotherapy at our institution between 2000 and 2022. Clinical characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected by chart review. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods. Recurrence patterns were assessed based on available post-treatment imaging. Results: Median patient age was 71 years (range: 31–83); 53.1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2. Radiotherapy was used as first-line treatment in 62.5% of cases, primarily due to contraindications to chemotherapy. Median OS was 10 months from diagnosis. Age, poor performance status, seizures at presentation, absence of systemic therapy, incomplete radiotherapy, and <80% applied dose of planned radiotherapy were associated with inferior OS in our univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis confirmed age, systemic therapy, seizures, and radiotherapy dose <80% as independent predictors. Among twenty-nine patients with imaging follow-up, eight recurrences after RT were documented: six of those within, and two outside of the initially affected areas. All recurrences occurred within previously irradiated areas. Conclusions: This study confirms known negative prognostic factors in PCNSL and underscores the importance of systemic chemotherapy for curatively intended treatments aiming for prolonged survival. The recurrence patterns observed question the added benefit of whole-brain irradiation in preventing distant relapses. These findings support the need for prospective trials to optimize radiotherapy strategies while balancing efficacy and neurotoxicity.

Background: Combining external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) enables biologically effective dose escalation in prostate cancer. However, comparative evaluation of such regimens using radiobiological modeling remains limited. Methods: Dose regimens based on clinical practice were analyzed using α/β values of 1.5 and 3 Gy for the prostate. Ten patients with available planning CT, pelvic MRI, and ultrasound-guided BT plans were retrospectively evaluated. Physical and biological dose distributions were recalculated for various EBRT and HDR-BT combinations. Biological effective dose (BED) values were determined for the prostate and organs at risk (OARs: anterior rectal wall, bladder base, urethra). Regimens yielding the highest ΔBED between prostate and OARs were considered most favorable. Results: All regimens met clinical dose constraints. The most favorable ΔBED profiles for bladder and rectum were observed with HDR-BT regimens (2 × 15 Gy) combined with either 23 × 2 Gy or 15 × 2.5 Gy EBRT, independent of the assumed α/β value. EBRT-only regimens achieved superior urethral sparing, while higher HDR doses led to increased urethral exposure. Conclusions: This study underscores the value of radiobiological modeling in differentiating and optimizing prostate cancer radiotherapy strategies. While the trade-offs between dose escalation and OAR sparing are clinically known, our biologically driven analysis provides a more quantitative foundation for selecting and tailoring combined EBRT/HDR-BT regimens in practice.

Brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) are complications of advanced-stage malignancies, associated with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the role of prognostic factors and radiotherapy (RT) treatment approaches while taking toxicity into account. We performed a retrospective study and compared clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, toxicities and outcomes in patients with (1) parenchymal brain metastases (PM) (n = 275) vs. LC (n = 35) and (2) in patients with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (n = 52) vs. WBRT + boost (n = 201). We found poorer survival (OS) of the LC group compared to PM patients in univariable analysis (not in multivariable analysis). LC patients predominantly underwent WBRT only, received surgical resection before RT less frequently and had more RT discontinuations than PM patients. OS was better in the WBRT + boost group than in the WBRT only group. In patients who received WBRT + boost, the primary tumor was more often controlled, and the number of PM was lower compared to the WBRT only group. WBRT + boost was associated with higher rates of alopecia than WBRT only. Patients with LC had a worse prognosis compared to patients with PM. WBRT + boost resulted in higher toxicity than WBRT only but resulted in better OS in the presented study. WBRT + boost patients had more favorable prognostic factors prior to RT, so OS improvement is not likely due to boost. Treating brain metastases requires a careful assessment of benefits and risks. Optimal RT planning should consider prognostic factors and potential side effects individually.