Sean MacDermott

Dr. Sean MacDermott

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 August 2009 in Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSean MacDermott
Sean MacDermott
EGEleonora Gullone
Eleonora Gullone
JAJ. Sabura Allen
J. Sabura Allen
NKNeville J. King
Neville J. King
BTBruce Tonge
Bruce Tonge

22 April 2019 in European Journal of Cancer Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Evelien R. SpeltenEvelien R. Spelten
Evelien R. Spelten
OGOlaf Geerse
Olaf Geerse
JVJulia Vuuren
Julia Vuuren
JTJennifer Timmis
Jennifer Timmis
BBBev Blanch
Bev Blanch
SMSean MacDermott
Sean MacDermott

1 June 2006 in Counselling Psychology Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJoan Elizabeth
Joan Elizabeth
NKNeville King
Neville King
TOThomas H. Ollendick
Thomas H. Ollendick
EGEleonora Gullone
Eleonora Gullone
BTBruce Tonge
Bruce Tonge
SMSean MacDermott
Sean MacDermott
Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is a heterogeneous and distressing problem for many children and youth. This review focuses on the etiology and maintenance of SAD, and examines research findings in several key areas of investigation: genetic or hereditary factors (twin and family studies), temperament characteristics (behavioural inhibition), and parent–child interactions (attachment, parenting styles). It is concluded that genetic influences, behavioural inhibition, and parent–child interactions play significant and interactive roles in the development and maintenance of SAD. Other influences such as peer relationships, social skills deficits, and traumatic experiences are also acknowledged. Ultimately, an understanding of such pathways should facilitate effective early screening and intervention of children at risk for severe social anxiety.

MYMark William Yates
Mark William Yates
JWJennifer Watts
Jennifer Watts
KBKasia Bail
Kasia Bail
Mohammadreza MohebbiMohammadreza Mohebbi
Mohammadreza Mohebbi
SMSean MacDermott
Sean MacDermott
HBHenry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty
Despite the increasing number of older people, many with cognitive impairment (CI), in hospitals, there is yet to be an evaluation of hospital-wide interventions improving the management of those with CI. In hospitalized patients with CI, there are likely to be associations between increased complications that impact on outcomes, length of stay, and costs. This prospective study will evaluate the effectiveness of an established hospital CI support program on patient outcomes, patient quality of life, staff awareness of CI, and carer satisfaction. Using a stepped-wedge, continuous-recruitment method, the pre-intervention patient data will provide the control data for usual hospital care. The intervention, the Dementia Care in Hospitals Program, provides hospital-wide CI awareness and support education, and screening for all patients aged 65+, along with a bedside alert, the Cognitive Impairment Identifier. The primary outcome is a reduction in hospital-acquired complications: urinary tract infections, pressure injuries, pneumonia and delirium. Secondary outcome measures include cost effectiveness, patient quality of life, carer satisfaction, staff awareness of CI, and staff perceived impact of care. This large-sample study across four sites offers an opportunity for research evaluation of health service functioning at a whole-of-hospital level, which is important for sustainable change in hospital practice.

22 March 2022 in Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSean MacDermott
Sean MacDermott
RMRebecca McKechnie
Rebecca McKechnie
DLDina LoGiudice
Dina LoGiudice
DMDebra Morgan
Debra Morgan
IBIrene Darmadi Blackberry
Irene Darmadi Blackberry
Australian National standards recommend routine screening for all adults over 65 years by health organisations that provide care for patients with cognitive impairment. Despite this, screening rates are low and, when implemented, screening is often not done well. This qualitative pilot study investigates barriers and facilitators to cognitive screening for older people in rural and regional Victoria, Australia. Focus groups and interviews were undertaken with staff across two health services. Data were analysed via thematic analysis and contextualized within the i-PARIHS framework. Key facilitators of screening included legislation, staff buy-in, clinical experience, appropriate training, and interorganisational relationships. Collaborative implementation processes, time, and workloads were considerations in a recently accredited tertiary care setting. Lack of specialist services, familiarity with patients, and infrastructural issues may be barriers exacerbated in rural settings. In lieu of rural specialist services, interorganisational relationships should be leveraged to facilitate referring ‘outwards’ rather than ‘upwards’.

1 December 2021 in Australian Journal of Rural Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WKWade B Kelly
Wade B Kelly
SMSean MacDermott
Sean MacDermott
Evelien R. SpeltenEvelien R. Spelten
Evelien R. Spelten