Prior to the usual clinical symptoms of dementia, there can be subtle changes in cognitive function that differ from the normal age-related cognitive decline, which has been termed mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The increase in the numbers of individuals with possible MCI presenting to health care professionals, notably, General Practitioners (GPs), is going to rise dramatically in the coming years. With ever increasing demands on GPs, it is therefore timely to provide information that can be accessed by health care professionals to assist them in making appropriate diagnoses and to provide the most relevant, evidence-based treatment options. We have provided a comprehensive list of recommendations that aim to address key aspects of MCI in primary care. Specifically, these relate to detection and diagnosis; sharing the diagnosis, monitoring, and follow up; practical interventions to potentially delay progression; and personalizing care—planning, engagement, and patient motivation for the long term.

Despite the increasing number of older people, many with cognitive impairment (CI), in hospitals, there is yet to be an evaluation of hospital-wide interventions improving the management of those with CI. In hospitalized patients with CI, there are likely to be associations between increased complications that impact on outcomes, length of stay, and costs. This prospective study will evaluate the effectiveness of an established hospital CI support program on patient outcomes, patient quality of life, staff awareness of CI, and carer satisfaction. Using a stepped-wedge, continuous-recruitment method, the pre-intervention patient data will provide the control data for usual hospital care. The intervention, the Dementia Care in Hospitals Program, provides hospital-wide CI awareness and support education, and screening for all patients aged 65+, along with a bedside alert, the Cognitive Impairment Identifier. The primary outcome is a reduction in hospital-acquired complications: urinary tract infections, pressure injuries, pneumonia and delirium. Secondary outcome measures include cost effectiveness, patient quality of life, carer satisfaction, staff awareness of CI, and staff perceived impact of care. This large-sample study across four sites offers an opportunity for research evaluation of health service functioning at a whole-of-hospital level, which is important for sustainable change in hospital practice.

This paper aimed to develop a model to describe help-seeking for dementia diagnosis. The practical model is intended to guide public health interventions to increase help-seeking. The model was developed by our multidisciplinary team based on qualitative semi-structured interviews in English (n = 33) and Chinese (n = 8) with older people, people with dementia and carers. The model was also informed by systematic reviews on help-seeking for dementia diagnosis, theories of help-seeking and further iterated based on feedback from a co-design group (n = 10). The model starts with changes which might be symptoms of dementia being observed by the person or family/friends and ends in dementia assessment. Model steps are (1) The person deciding that the changes represent a health problem; (2) obtaining support or confirmation from family/friends that the changes are a health problem; (3) deciding to seek medical help; and (4) persuading the GP to facilitate dementia assessment. The model applies to English and Chinese-speaking Australians, though there were additional barriers for Chinese speakers. There are personal, family, community and health system barriers at each step. Interventions to improve diagnosis of dementia might target public knowledge of dementia symptoms and benefits of a diagnosis, and general practice.

Introduction Nationally and internationally it is well recognised that dementia is poorly recognised and suboptimally managed in the primary care setting. There are multiple and complex reasons for this gap in care, including a lack of knowledge, high care demands and inadequate time for the general practitioner alone to manage dementia with its multiple physical, psychological and social dimensions. The primary care nurse potentially has a role in assisting the general practitioner in the provision of evidence-based dementia care. Although dementia-care guidelines for general practitioners exist, evidence on resources to support the primary care nurse in dementia care provision is scarce. The ‘Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia’ provides 109 recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dementia. This protocol describes a Delphi study to identify which of the 109 recommendations contained in these multidisciplinary guidelines are relevant to the primary care nurse in the delivery of person-centred dementia care in the general practice setting. Methods and analysis Using a Delphi consensus online survey, an expert panel will grade each of the recommendations written in the ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia’ as high-to-low relevance with respect to the role of the primary care nurse in general practice. To optimise reliability of results, quality indicators will be used in the data collection and reporting of the study. Invited panel members will include Australian primary care nurses working in general practice, primary care nursing researchers and representatives of the Australian Primary Health Care Nurses Association, the peak professional body for nurses working in primary healthcare. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by The University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (H-2019-0029). Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

Background: Hospitalized older patients with cognitive impairment (CI) experience poor outcomes and high rates of hospital acquired complications (HACs). This study investigated the effectiveness of a multimodal hospital CI identification and education program. Method: A prospective stepped-wedge, cross-sectional, continuous-recruitment, hybrid effectiveness-Implementation study was conducted in acute hospitals in four Australian states/territories. The intervention, the Dementia Care in Hospitals Program (DHCP) provided: clinical/ non-clinical hospital staff CI awareness support and education; CI screening for older patients and a bedside alert—the Cognitive Impairment Identifier (CII). The primary outcome was change in the rate of the combined risk of four HACs (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, new onset delirium, pressure injury). Results: Participants were patients aged 65 years and over admitted for 24 h or more over a 12-month period between 2015–2017 (n = 16,789). Of the 11,309 (67.4%) screened, 4,277 (37.8%) had CI. HACs occurred in 27.4% of all screened patients and were three times more likely in patients with CI after controlling for age and sex (RR = 3.03; 95%CI:2.74–3.27). There was no significant change in HAC rate for patients with CI (RR = 1.084; 95%CI: 0.93; 1.26). In the intervention period the raw HAC rate for all screened patients was 27.0%, which when adjusted for age and sex suggested a small reduction overall. However, when adjusted for hospital site, this reduction in HAC risk not statistically significant (RR = 0.968; 95%CI:0.865–1.083). There was considerable interhospital variation in intervention implementation and outcomes which explains the final non-significant effect. Conclusion: For patient with CI the implementation of the DCHP did not result in a reduction in HAC rates. Education for hospital staff regarding cognitive impairment screening, care support, carer engagement and bedside alerts, using the DCHP, can be feasibly implemented in acute hospitals. Reducing high frequency HACs in older hospital patients with CI, warrants further research. Trial Registration. The trial was registered retrospectively with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12615000905561 on 01/09/2015 with 92 patients (0.8% of total sample) recruited in the baseline and none in the intervention before registration submission.