The evaluation and selection of an optimal, efficient and reliable supplier is becoming more and more important for companies in today’s logistics and supply chain management. Decision-making in the supplier selection domain, as an essential component of the supply chain management, is a complex process since a wide range of diverse criteria, stakeholders and possible solutions are embedded into this process. This paper shows a fuzzy approach in multi – criteria decision-making (MCDM) process. Criteria weights have been determined by fuzzy SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) method. Chosen methods, fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for the Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), fuzzy WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) and fuzzy ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) have been used for evaluation and selection of suppliers in the case of procurement of THK Linear motion guide components by the group of specialists in the “Lagerton” company in Serbia. Finally, results obtained using different MCDM approaches were compared in order to help managers to identify appropriate method for supplier selection problem solving.

Laser cutting parameters synergistically affect, although in different quantitative and qualitative manners, multiple process performances, such as the resulting cut quality characteristics, material removal rate, cutting time, and costs, and the determination of the most appropriate laser cutting conditions for a given application is of prime importance. Given the existence of multiple mutually opposite performances, assessment and laser cutting conditions and performance can be considered a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In order to overcome the possible inconsistency of rankings determined by different MCDM methods while solving the same decision-making problem, the present study promotes a novel methodology for the assessment and selection of laser cutting conditions by developing a robust decision-making rule (RDMR) that combines different decision-making rules from six MCDM methods and Taguchi’s principles of robust design. In order to illustrate the application of the proposed methodology, CO₂ laser cutting in a stainless-steel experiment, based on the use of the Box–Behnken design, was conducted. On the basis of the experimental results, a comprehensive laser cutting MCDM model was developed with seven criteria related to cut quality (i.e., kerf geometry and cut surface), productivity, variable costs, and environmental aspects. It was observed that there was no laser cutting condition that could be considered as the best regime with respect to the different laser cutting process performances. Kendall’s and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients indicated a certain level of disagreement among the resulting rankings of the laser cutting conditions produced by the considered MCDM methods, whereas the application of the proposed RDMR ensured the highest level of ranking consistency. Some possibilities for modeling of RDMR and its further use for the assessment of arbitrarily chosen laser cutting conditions and the use of the derived model to perform sensitivity analysis for determining the most influential laser cutting parameters are also discussed and addressed. It was observed that laser cutting parameters in different laser cutting conditions may have a variable effect on the resulting overall process performances. The comparison of the obtained results and the results determined by classical desirability-based multi-objective optimization revealed that there exists substantial agreement between the most preferable and least preferable laser cutting conditions, thus justifying the applied methodology.

Multiple benefits and advantages that offer laser cutting technology are difficult to achieve if the laser cutting parameter conditions are not adequately set. Determining laser cutting conditions is not trivial task considering large number of controllable inputs, existence of multiple process performances which are often mutually opposed as well as effects of noise factors. Different scientific methods and engineering approaches represent more sophisticated approaches which aid assessment and determination of the most favourable (optimized) cutting conditions. This study is focused assessment and ranking of laser cutting conditions in CO2 laser cutting of AISI 316L stainless steel. Based on kerf width and surface roughness experimental data and estimation of material removal rate (MRR) and total variable costs, four criteria in the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model were considered. For solving the developed model, six well-known MCDM methods were applied, and in addition, in order to overcome ranking inconsistency, robust decision-making rule was developed upon which final ranking was obtained.

Aggregation methods in group decision-making refer to techniques used to combine the individual preferences, opinions, or judgments of group members into a collective decision. Each aggregation method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the best method to use depends on the specific situation and the goals of the decision-making process. In certain cases, final rankings of alternatives in the decision-making process may depend on the way of combining different attitudes. The focus of this paper is the application and comparative analysis of the aggregation operators, specifically, arithmetic mean (AM), geometric mean (GM), and Dombi Bonferroni mean (DBM), to the process of criteria weights determination in a fuzzy environment. The criteria weights are determined using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (F-MCDM) methods, such as Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP), Fuzzy Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (F-PIPRECIA), and Fuzzy Full Consistency Method (F-FUCOM), while the final alternative ranking is obtained by Fuzzy Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (F-WASPAS). A comparison of aggregation operators is done for the real case of location selection problem for a used motor oil transfer station in the regional center of Southern and Eastern Serbia, the city of Niš. The results obtained in this study showed that the views of different experts and application of a certain aggregation approach may have a significant impact on the values of criteria weight coefficients and further on the final ranking of alternatives. This paper is expected to stimulate future research into the impact of aggregation methods on final rankings in the decision-making process, especially in the field of waste management.

The objective of this paper is to present a novel, hybrid group multi-criteria decision approach that can be used to evaluate alternatives for the optimal synthesis of loader drive mechanisms. In most product design engineering groups, experts have expertise in different areas and robust decision-making is necessary to integrate a number of opposing opinions, attitudes, and solutions. This study presents the application of an integrated approach for decision-making, i.e., the generation of a robust decision-making rule for group decision-making (RDMR-G) by combining different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and Taguchi’s robust quality engineering principles. The basic idea behind this article was to create an approach that enables the comprehensive and robust consideration of expert opinions given the existence of numerous objective and subjective methods for determining the criteria weights, which are crucial to the final ranking of alternatives in any decision-making problem. In order to set the optimal configuration of a loader drive mechanism, five experts, all with a high level of experience and knowledge in this field, considered twenty-six different kinematic chain construction solutions, i.e., alternatives, and evaluated them with respect to six criteria. The obtained results and rankings provided by each expert and each criteria weighting method were compared using Kendall’s τ_b and Spearman’s ρ tests. As an example, this paper demonstrates the practical application of a RDMR-G approach and in doing so contributes to the literature in the fields of product design engineering and decision-making.