Our paper systematically studies how artificial intelligence (AI) is represented and applied in research on the energy transition of modern power grids. It combines a network bibliometric review and VOSviewer mapping with metadata-based natural language processing (NLP) of 361 Scopus records published between 2018 and 2026. We attempt to identify the intellectual structure of the field but do not infer that AI causes the energy transition. To connect the dominant forecasting and coordination themes to power-system operation, our study introduces a controlled one-week dispatch experiment in which generation, storage, demand flexibility, reserve requirements, costs, and actual time series are held constantly across scenarios.Titles, abstracts, author keywords, and index keywords were represented using TF-IDF n-grams, non-negative matrix factorization, truncated-SVD embeddings, k-means clustering, and dictionary-based pattern detection. Candidate cluster solutions were compared using the silhouette coefficient, and results were triangulated with the VOSviewer maps. Six interrelated domains emerge: forecasting and predictive analytics; microgrid control and distributed resources; renewable integration, storage, and electric-vehicle charging; cybersecurity and digital infrastructure; policy, markets, and transition governance; and solar/urban applications. In the controlled simulation, only forecast-information quality changes (18%, 11%, and 4% mean absolute percentage error). Across 50 matched Monte Carlo runs, the 4% error case reduces balancing energy by 77.6%, curtailment by 60.5%, and operating cost by 8.0% relative to the 18% case, while emissions decline by 1.2% and renewable share rises by 0.42 percentage points. These results support a narrower conclusion: AI-enabled forecasting may improve operational coordination when embedded in an otherwise unchanged system, but we do not establish AI as a structural or economy-wide determinant of the renewable energy transition.