Viktoriia Khaustova

Prof. Viktoriia Khaustova

Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine, Director
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
OAO Arefieva
O Arefieva
SPS Piletska
S Piletska
Viktoriia KhaustovaViktoriia Khaustova
Viktoriia Khaustova
ZPZarina Poberezhna
Zarina Poberezhna
DZD Zyz
D Zyz
The economic stability of the company’s business processes was monitored, especially during the period of implementation of the benefits of sustainable development, which will attract new investment flows and ensure economic security. A conceptual model for monitoring the economic stability of the company’s business processes has been developed. A methodical approach to monitoring the economic stability of the company’s business processes by influencing the financial, personnel, marketing, innovation, production components depending on the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of available resources is proposed.

8 March 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGInna Gryshova
Inna Gryshova
Kyzym MykolaKyzym Mykola
Kyzym Mykola
Viktoriia KhaustovaViktoriia Khaustova
Viktoriia Khaustova
Volodymyr KorneevVolodymyr Korneev
Volodymyr Korneev
HKHennadii Kramarev
Hennadii Kramarev
The article proves that despite a significant growth in the service sector in recent years, industry remains the main engine of economic growth. Moreover, using the analysis of statistical data, it is shown that the development of industrial complexes of countries of the world is accompanied by corresponding structural changes, which in turn determines their economic development in general. The study aims to solve the following issues: which structure of the national industry can be considered progressive under modern conditions, i.e., can lead to progress and sustainable socio-economic growth; whether there is a correlation between the progressive structure of the country’s industry and its economic development and the quality of life of its population; how the approach of the country’s industrial structure to its progressive state influences the country’s economic development and quality of life of its population. The purpose of the study is to justify or refute the hypothesis about influence of progressiveness of the industrial structure on sustainable economic development and quality of life of the population. The main methods used in the study are cluster analysis and integral assessment. The statistical basis of the study is the data on inter-branch balances for 36 countries of the world for 2009, 2011 and 2014. The results obtained in the study allowed confirming the hypothesis about the positive influence of approach of the industrial structure of countries of the world to its progressive state on the sustainable economic development and quality of life of their population. This conclusion can be considered as the basis for forming the state policy of the world’s countries to develop their economies and improve the quality of life of their population.

17 September 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IGInna Gryshova
Inna Gryshova
Kyzym MykolaKyzym Mykola
Kyzym Mykola
Iryna HubarievaIryna Hubarieva
Iryna Hubarieva
Viktoriia KhaustovaViktoriia Khaustova
Viktoriia Khaustova
LALivinskyi Anatolii
Livinskyi Anatolii
Mykola KoroshсhenkoMykola Koroshсhenko
Mykola Koroshсhenko
The article proves that security of the national economy characterizes the ability of the country to withstand the destabilizing effects of various internal and external threats and to ensure its sustainable development. The study is carried out in the following stages: Diagnosing threats to security of the national economy → assessing the level of economic security of countries of the world → clustering countries of the world according to the level of economic security → modelling the impact of the national economic security on sustainable economic development of a country → forming measures to ensure security of a country’s economy. The basis for assessing the level of economic security of a country is a hierarchically constructed system of indicators, including composite, complex, and sub-indicators. The assessment of the level of economic security is carried out on the basis of international indices and rankings. The analysis of the correlation between the level of GDP per capita and individual indicators included in the composite indicator of economic security made it possible to identify those that should become the primary concerns of governments in order to enhance economic security as well as increase the level of GDP and ensure sustainable development of countries.

1 January 2022 in Business Inform
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OKO. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv
Kyzym MykolaKyzym Mykola
Kyzym Mykola
Viktoriia KhaustovaViktoriia Khaustova
Viktoriia Khaustova
RUResearch Centre of Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine
Research Centre of Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine
NTNataliia Trushkina
Nataliia Trushkina
At the present stage, critical infrastructure is recognized as the main component of the national economy and the basis of both government and regional policy in the context of ensuring national security. Given this, the purpose of the present study is to generalize and systematize theoretical approaches to the interpretation of the concept of «critical infrastructure»; a closer definition of the essence and content of this term from the standpoint of recovering the national economy and ensuring the national security of Ukraine. As a result of the study, it is found that the concept of «critical infrastructure» is identified with such definitions as: infrastructure; life support systems; critical infrastructure objects; vital social functions; production, goods, services, and related processes. Using a systematic approach and a classification method, the interpretation of the term «critical infrastructure», which is proposed by various scientific schools, is conditionally systematized according to the following groups: system; elements of the system; structure (network, physical, organizational); aggregate of assets; security direction; key security task on the part of the State; object of protection (administrative, legal, cybernetic); component of national infrastructure; object of public administration; information security component, etc. The article provides the authors’ own approach to the definition of the concept of «critical infrastructure» as an aggregate of objects, systems, networks that are of priority and of strategic importance for the development of a competitive national economy and provision of an adequate level of national security, the neutralized or disrupted functioning of which may harm the national interests of the State, lead to the emergence of possible threats and risks, significant expenditures and losses. It is proposed to consider critical infrastructure as a scientific category from the standpoint of effective implementation of the priority security tasks of the State; ensuring the national security; increasing the level of resilience of the functioning of systems and infrastructure objects; risk management; implementation of the State policy in the field of their protection; recovery of the national economy.

25 July 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WDWang Diankai
Wang Diankai
IGInna Gryshova
Inna Gryshova
Kyzym MykolaKyzym Mykola
Kyzym Mykola
TSTetiana Salashenko
Tetiana Salashenko
Viktoriia KhaustovaViktoriia Khaustova
Viktoriia Khaustova
MSMaryna Shcherbata
Maryna Shcherbata
Competition in electricity markets leads to volatile conditions which cause persistent price fluctuations over time. This study explores the problem of electricity pricing fluctuations in the DE-LU bidding zone from October 2018 to March 2022 by applying time series analysis. The determinants of electricity price fluctuations are broken down into three groups: exogenous prices (gas, coal and CO2 prices), internal (consumption and generation) and external (net import between neighboring bidding zones) electricity flows. Based on the SARIMAX model, we tried to combine all these factors to forecast electricity prices in the single bidding zone. It was found that the SARIMAX (1, 1, 2) × (3, 1, 0, 7) model with exogenous prices, internal and external electricity flows, which has the lowest AIC and MAPE values, is the best-fitted model for the DE-LU bidding zone. Anonymous trading and unpredictable individual bidding strategies lead to persistent price volatility, which causes electricity prices to deviate from fundamental trends. To reveal the risk factors, the SARIMAX model of electricity prices needs to be supplemented with a GARCH model of the residual returns. For forecasting electricity price residual volatility in the DE-LU bidding zone, the SARIMAX model with exogenous prices, internal and external electricity flows must be accompanied with the GARCH (7, 0) model.

1 January 2023 in Business Inform
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RUResearch Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine
Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine
Viktoriia KhaustovaViktoriia Khaustova
Viktoriia Khaustova
OROlena I. Reshetnyak
Olena I. Reshetnyak
The article is concerned with the conception of resilience, originated from ecological studies and then subsequently applied to social and economic systems. The aim of the study is to determine the contents of the concept of «resilience» and identify the key challenges of resilience with regard to the Ukrainian economy in the 21st century. The essence of the concepts of «resilience», «resilience of economy», existing approaches to their interpretation, difference from the concepts of «sustainability» and «stability» were studied; the key risks and shocks that posed the challenges in terms of resilience of the Ukrainian economy in the 21st century are identified and examined. It is defined that resilience in the economy means the ability of the system to recover and adapt after crisis, stressful situations. The concept of resilience differs from sustainability and stability, emphasizing the post-event adaptation of the system. Two approaches to understanding resilience have been defined: the first is focused on recovering the system to equilibrium after crisis events, and the second – on the constant adaptation to changes. Situations in Ukraine, such as the global financial crisis of 2008, russian aggression in 2014, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the russian invasion in 2022, have significantly affected the country’s economy and underlined the need to develop resilient mechanisms to ensure sustainability and recovery from shock events. The importance of understanding and researching the conception of resilience for the development of effective strategies for crisis management and creation of stable economic systems in changing conditions is substantiated. Implementation of experience and study of resilience factors of other countries that faced similar challenges after military conflicts can be useful for Ukraine to overcome the crisis, ensure stability and growth, as well as preserve the potential for further development after the cease of the war.