Background: The colorectum includes ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. Different sites of colorectal cancer (CRC) are different in many aspects, including clinical symptoms, biological behaviour, and prognosis. Purpose: This study aimed to analyse prognosis, genes, bacteria, fungi, and microbial metabolome in different sites of CRC. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and STAT were used to statistically describe and analyse the prognosis in different sites of CRC. RNA sequences of CRC from Broad Institute’s GDAC Firehose were re-annotated and reanalysed based on different sites using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyse the prognosis and Cytoscape was used to construct a drug-target network based on DGIdb databases. Bacterial 16S V3–V4 and fungal ITS V3–V4 ribosomal RNA genes of stool samples were sequenced. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GS/MS) was performed to detect the microbial metabolites in stool samples. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to compare distinct gut microorganisms and microbial metabolites between rectal and sigmoid cancers. Results: The prognosis in CRC with different sites is significantly different. The closer to the anus predicted longer survival time. The difference between genes and co-expression pairs in CRC with different sites were constructed. The relative abundance of 112 mRNAs and 26 lncRNAs correlated with the sites of CRC were listed. Nine differentially expressed genes at different sites of CRC were correlated with prognosis. A drug-gene interaction network contained 227 drug-gene pairs were built. The relative abundance of gut bacteria and gut fungus, and the content of microbe-related metabolites were statistically different between rectal and sigmoid cancers. Conclusions: There are many differences in prognosis, genome, drug targets, gut microbiome, and microbial metabolome in different colorectal cancer sites. These findings may improve our understanding of the role of the CRC sites in personalized and precision medicine.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a group of non-protein coding RNAs with a length of more than 200 bp. The lncRNA taurine up-regulated gene 1 (TUG1) is abnormally expressed in many human malignant cancers, where it acts as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA), regulating gene expression by specifically sponging its corresponding microRNAs. In the present review, we summarised the current understanding of the role of lncRNATUG1in cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, chemotherapeutic drug resistance, radiosensitivity, cell regulation, and cell glycolysis, as well as highlighting its potential application as a clinical biomarker or therapeutic target for malignant cancer. This review provides the basis for new research directions for lncRNATUG1in cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Background: Aging is one of the factors leading to cancer. Gut microbiota is related to aging and colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods: A total of 11 metagenomic data sets related to CRC were collected from the R package curated Metagenomic Data. After batch effect correction, healthy individuals and CRC samples were divided into three age groups. Ggplot2 and Microbiota Process packages were used for visual description of species composition and PCA in healthy individuals and CRC samples. LEfSe analysis was performed for species relative abundance data in healthy/CRC groups according to age. Spearman correlation coefficient of age‐differentiated bacteria in healthy individuals and CRC samples was calculated separately. Finally, the age prediction model and CRC risk prediction model were constructed based on the age‐differentiated bacteria.Results: The structure and composition of the gut microbiota were significantly different among the three groups. For example, the abundance of Bacteroides vulgatus in the old group was lower than that in the other two groups, the abundance of Bacteroides fragilis increased with aging. In addition, seven species of bacteria whose abundance increases with aging were screened out. Furthermore, the abundance of pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia_coli, Butyricimonas_virosa, Ruminococcus_bicirculans, Bacteroides_fragilis and Streptococcus_vestibularis) increased with aging in CRCs. The abundance of probiotics (Eubacterium_eligens) decreased with aging in CRCs. The age prediction model for healthy individuals based on the 80 age‐related differential bacteria and model of CRC patients based on the 58 age‐related differential bacteria performed well, with AUC of 0.79 and 0.71, respectively. The AUC of CRC risk prediction model based on 45 disease differential bacteria was 0.83. After removing the intersection between the disease‐differentiated bacteria and the age‐differentiated bacteria from the healthy samples, the AUC of CRC risk prediction model based on remaining 31 bacteria was 0.8. CRC risk prediction models for each of the three age groups showed no significant difference in accuracy (young: AUC=0.82, middle: AUC=0.83, old: AUC=0.85).Conclusion: Age as a factor affecting microbial composition should be considered in the application of gut microbiota to predict the risk of CRC.

Background: Early diagnosis of liver metastasis is of great importance for enhancing the survival of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CAD) patients, and the combined use of a single biomarker in a classier model has shown great improvement in predicting the metastasis of several types of cancers. However, it is little reported for CAD. This study therefore aimed to screen an optimal classier model of CAD with liver metastasis and explore the metastatic mechanisms of genes when applying this classier model.Methods: The differentially expressed genes between primary CAD samples and CAD with metastasis samples were screened from the Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) dataset GSE131418. The classification performances of six selected algorithms, namely, LR, RF, SVM, GBDT, NN, and CatBoost, for classification of CAD with liver metastasis samples were compared using the MCC dataset GSE131418 by detecting their classification test accuracy. In addition, the consortium datasets of GSE131418 and GSE81558 were used as internal and external validation sets to screen the optimal method. Subsequently, functional analyses and a drug‐targeted network construction of the feature genes when applying the optimal method were conducted.Results: The optimal CatBoost model with the highest accuracy of 99%, and an area under the curve of 1, was screened, which consisted of 33 feature genes. A functional analysis showed that the feature genes were closely associated with a “steroid metabolic process” and “lipoprotein particle receptor binding” (eg APOB and APOC3). In addition, the feature genes were significantly enriched in the “complement and coagulation cascade” pathways (eg FGA, F2, and F9). In a drug‐target interaction network, F2 and F9 were predicted as targets of menadione.Conclusion: The CatBoost model constructed using 33 feature genes showed the optimal classification performance for identifying CAD with liver metastasis.

Increasing evidence suggested that cholesterol is an important integrant of cell membranes, that plays a key role in tumor progression, immune dysregulation, and pathological changes in epigenetic mechanisms. Based on these theories, there is a growing interest on targeting cholesterol in the treatment of cancer. Here, we comprehensively reviewed the major function of cholesterol on oncogenicity, the therapeutic targets of cholesterol and its metabolites in cancer, and provide detailed insight into the essential roles of cholesterol in mediating immune and epigenetic mechanisms of the tumor microenvironment. It is also worth mentioning that the gut microbiome is an indispensable component of cancer mediation because of its role in cholesterol metabolism. Finally, we summarized recent studies on the potential targets of cholesterol and their metabolism, to provide more therapeutic interventions in oncology.