Michael Gast

Mr. Michael Gast


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 March 2018 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMichael Gast
Michael Gast
SKStefanie Kühner
Stefanie Kühner
HSHarald Sobek
Harald Sobek
PWPaul Walther
Paul Walther
BMBoris Mizaikoff
Boris Mizaikoff

6 January 2020 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMichael Gast
Michael Gast
FWFanny Wondany
Fanny Wondany
BRBastian Raabe
Bastian Raabe
JMJens Michaelis
Jens Michaelis
HSHarald Sobek
Harald Sobek
BMBoris Mizaikoff
Boris Mizaikoff

8 March 2021 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJ. A. M. Lehmann
J. A. M. Lehmann
ESElena Schwarz
Elena Schwarz
ZAZ. Rahmani Azad
Z. Rahmani Azad
SGSusan Gritzka
Susan Gritzka
TSTanja Seifried-Dübon
Tanja Seifried-Dübon
HGHarald Guendel
Harald Guendel
Background: Leaders in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are exposed to increased stress as a result of a range of challenges. Moreover, they rarely have the opportunity to participate in stress management trainings. Therefore, KMU-GO (ger: Kleine und mittlere Unternehmen – Gesundheitsoffensive; en: small and medium-sized enterprises – health campaign) aims at conducting and evaluating such a stress management training. The focus of evaluation does not only lie on the effects on leaders participating but also on their employees. Methods: The study is planned as a 2 × 3 mixed design with two groups (intervention and waiting control group) as a between factor and point in time (at baseline, 6 and 12 months later) as a within factor. We aim at collecting data from N = 200 leaders. Based on the results of a preceding assessment, an already successfully implemented stress management training was adapted to SME needs and now serves as the framework of this intervention. The stress management training comprises one and a half days and is followed by two booster sessions (each 180 min) about 3 and 6 months after the training. The main focus of this intervention lies on specifying leaders stress reactivity while at the same time investigating its effects on employees’ mental health. Further dependent variables are leaders´ depression and anxiety scores, effort-reward imbalance, sick days and psychophysiological measures of heart rate variability, hair cortisol, and salivary alpha-amylase. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted from a societal and employers’ point of view. Discussion: Stress management is a highly relevant issue for leaders in SMEs. By providing an adequate occupational stress management training, we expect to improve leaders´ and also employees` mental health, thereby preventing economic losses for SMEs and the national economy. However, collecting data from employees about the success of a stress management training of their leader is a highly sensitive topic. It requires a carefully planned proceeding ensuring for example a high degree of transparency, anonymity, and providing team incentives. Trial registration: The KMU-GO trial is registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS): DRKS00023457 (05.11.2020)

MGMichael Gast
Michael Gast
JLJanina Lehmann
Janina Lehmann
ESElena Schwarz
Elena Schwarz
CHChristian Hirning
Christian Hirning
MHMichael Hoelzer
Michael Hoelzer
Elisabeth Maria BalintElisabeth Maria Balint
Elisabeth Maria Balint
Background: Mental illnesses have received increasing attention in the work context in recent years, yet they are still often accompanied by stigma. One starting point for stigma reduction is interventions in the workplace. The present study evaluated a one-day workshop for managers in a large company. Method: Enrolled managers (n = 70) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and the waiting control group. The training included a theoretical section on mental and stress-related diseases as well as the interplay between work and health, group work on personal stress experience, theoretical input on dealing with mentally ill employees, and a group discussion on this topic along with case studies. Both groups completed the following questionnaires at baseline and three months after training: Effort–Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire, Mental Health Knowledge Schedule, Social Distance Scale, and the Irritation Scale. Results: Compared to the waiting group, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (U = 417.00, p = 0.040) and an increase in the Irritation Scale (U = 371.50 p = 0.011). All other scales remained unchanged. Conclusion: The content and duration of the training were adequate to reduce cognitive stigma towards mental illness. However, the present approach was not sufficient for an improvement in the subjective stress level of the participating managers.