Barbara Kinga Barták

Dr. Barbara Kinga Barták


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 September 2017 in Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BBBarbara Kinga Barták
Barbara Kinga Barták
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
BPBálint Péterfia
Bálint Péterfia
ÁPÁrpád V. Patai
Árpád V. Patai
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
Aberrant methylation is one of the most frequent epigenetic alterations that can contribute to tumor formation. Cell-free DNA can originate from tumor tissue; therefore, the evaluation of methylation markers in cell-free DNA can be a promising method for cancer screening. Our aim was to develop a panel of biomarkers with altered methylation along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence in both colonic tissue and plasma. Methylation of selected CpG sites in healthy colonic (n = 15), adenoma (n = 15), and colorectal cancer (n = 15) tissues was analyzed by pyrosequencing. MethyLight PCR was applied to study the DNA methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2, and PRIMA1 gene promoters in 121 plasma and 32 biopsy samples. The effect of altered promoter methylation on protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. Significantly higher (P < 0.05) DNA methylation levels were detected in the promoter regions of all 4 markers, both in CRC and adenoma tissues compared with healthy controls. Methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2, and PRIMA1 promoter sequences was observed in 85.1%, 72.3%, 89.4%, and 80.9% of plasma samples from patients with CRC and 89.2%, 83.8%, 81.1% and 70.3% from adenoma patients, respectively. When applied as a panel, CRC patients could be distinguished from controls with 91.5% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.978], while adenoma samples could be differentiated with 89.2% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity (AUC = 0.937). Immunohistochemical analysis indicated decreasing protein levels of all 4 markers along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Our findings suggest that this methylation biomarker panel allows non-invasive detection of colorectal adenoma and cancer from plasma samples.

1 July 2016 in Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
BPBálint Péterfia
Bálint Péterfia
ICIstvan Csabai
Istvan Csabai
ABAndrás Bodor
András Bodor
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
The WNT signaling pathway has an essential role in colorectal carcinogenesis and progression, which involves a cascade of genetic and epigenetic changes. We aimed to analyze DNA methylation affecting the WNT pathway genes in colorectal carcinogenesis in promoter and gene body regions using whole methylome analysis in 9 colorectal cancer, 15 adenoma, and 6 normal tumor adjacent tissue (NAT) samples by methyl capture sequencing. Functional methylation was confirmed on 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine-treated colorectal cancer cell line datasets. In parallel with the DNA methylation analysis, mutations of WNT pathway genes (APC, β-catenin/CTNNB1) were analyzed by 454 sequencing on GS Junior platform. Most differentially methylated CpG sites were localized in gene body regions (95% of WNT pathway genes). In the promoter regions, 33 of the 160 analyzed WNT pathway genes were differentially methylated in colorectal cancer vs. normal, including hypermethylated AXIN2, CHP1, PRICKLE1, SFRP1, SFRP2, SOX17, and hypomethylated CACYBP, CTNNB1, MYC; 44 genes in adenoma vs. NAT; and 41 genes in colorectal cancer vs. adenoma comparisons. Hypermethylation of AXIN2, DKK1, VANGL1, and WNT5A gene promoters was higher, while those of SOX17, PRICKLE1, DAAM2, and MYC was lower in colon carcinoma compared to adenoma. Inverse correlation between expression and methylation was confirmed in 23 genes, including APC, CHP1, PRICKLE1, PSEN1, and SFRP1. Differential methylation affected both canonical and noncanonical WNT pathway genes in colorectal normal-adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Aberrant DNA methylation appears already in adenomas as an early event of colorectal carcinogenesis.

27 January 2018 in Pathology and Oncology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBBarbara Kinga Barták
Barbara Kinga Barták
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
BWBarnabás Wichmann
Barnabás Wichmann
ZNZsófia Brigitta Nagy
Zsófia Brigitta Nagy
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár

16 May 2019 in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
BBBarbara Kinga Barták
Barbara Kinga Barták
ZNZsófia Brigitta Nagy
Zsófia Brigitta Nagy
MDMagdolna Dank
Magdolna Dank
Introduction: Screening methods for one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancy, colorectal cancer (CRC), have limitations. Circulating cell-free nucleic acids (cfNA) hold clinical relevance as screening, prognostic and therapy monitoring markers. Area covered: In this review, we summarize potential CRC-specific cfNA biomarkers, the recently developed sample preparation techniques, their applications, and pitfalls. Expert opinion: Automated extraction of cfDNA is highly reproducible, however, cfDNA yield is less compared to manual isolation. Quantitative and highly sensitive detection techniques (digital PCR, NGS) can be applied to analyse genetic and epigenetic changes. Detection of DNA mutations or methylation in cfDNA and related altered levels of mRNA, miRNA, and lncRNA may improve early cancer recognition, based on specific, CRC-related patterns. Detection of cfDNA mutations (e.g. TP53, KRAS, APC) has limited diagnostic sensitivity (40-60%), however, methylated DNA including SEPT9, SFRP1, SDC2 can be applied with higher sensitivity (up to 90%) for CRC. Circulating miRNAs (e.g. miR-21, miR-92, miR-141) provide comparably high sensitivity for CRC as the circulating tumor cell mRNA markers (e.g. EGFR, CK19, CK20, CEA). Automation of cfNA isolation coupled with quantitative analysis of CRC-related, highly sensitive biomarkers may enhance CRC screening and early detection in the future.

20 April 2020 in Pathology and Oncology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
Anna SebestyénAnna Sebestyén
Anna Sebestyén
TDTitanilla Dankó
Titanilla Dankó
CKCsilla Kriston
Csilla Kriston
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
Up-regulation of the long non-coding RNA LINC00152 can contribute to cancer development, proliferation and invasion, including colorectal cancer, however, its mechanism of action in colorectal carcinogenesis and progression is only insufficiently understood. In this work we correlated LINC00152 expression with promoter DNA methylation changes in colorectal tissues along the normal-adenoma-carcinoma sequence and studied the effects of LINC00152 silencing on the cell cycle regulation and on the whole transcriptome in colon carcinoma cells using cell and molecular biology techniques. LINC00152 was significantly up-regulated in adenoma and colorectal cancer (p < 0.001) compared to normal samples, which was confirmed by real-time PCR and in situ hybridization. LINC00152 promoter hypomethylation detected in colorectal cancer (p < 0.01) was strongly correlated with increased LINC00152 expression (r=-0.90). Silencing of LINC00152 significantly suppressed cell growth, induced apoptosis and decreased cyclin D1 expression (p < 0.05). Whole transcriptome analysis of LINC00152-silenced cells revealed significant down-regulation of oncogenic and metastasis promoting genes (e.g. YES proto-oncogene 1, PORCN porcupine O-acyltransferase), and up-regulation of tumour suppressor genes (e.g. DKK1 dickkopf WNT signalling pathway inhibitor 1, PERP p53 apoptosis effector) (adjusted p < 0.05). Pathway analysis confirmed the LINC00152-related activation of oncogenic molecular pathways including those driven by PI3K/Akt, Ras, WNT, TP53, Notch and ErbB. Our results suggest that promoter hypomethylation related overexpression of LINC00152 can contribute to the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer by facilitating cell progression through the up-regulation of several oncogenic and metastasis promoting pathway elements.

1 July 2019 in Orvosi Hetilap
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BBBarbara Kinga Barták
Barbara Kinga Barták
EMEszter Márkus
Eszter Márkus
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
KSKrisztina Szigeti
Krisztina Szigeti
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) are considerably high in Central European countries, it is the second most common cancer in both men and women in Hungary with 10,000 newly registered patients per year. These data indicate the necessity of new screening methods that are more comfortable for patients, hence the compliance can be increased. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) level in blood is elevated in certain physiological conditions, such as pregnancy or high physical activity. Furthermore, cfDNA concentration alterations can also be detected in some pathological processes; increased cfDNA amount was observed in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, as well as in various cancers including CRC. Numerous studies about origin, function, and mechanism of cfDNA can be found in the scientific literature. In this review, we aimed to describe the quantitative and qualitative changes of cfDNA, to present its functions, and to provide an overview of the available diagnostic applications for CRC. CfDNA can be released to the circulatory system via apoptosis, necrosis or by direct secretions by living cells. In cancer patients, cfDNA can originate from healthy and cancer cells, hence genetic (eg. mutations in APC, KRAS, BRAF) and epigenetic (eg. methylation in SEPT9, SERP1) alterations of tumor cells can be examined in cfDNA fraction. Several high-throughput, sensitive and even automated methods are available providing opportunity to perform standardized sample preparation and to analyse biomarker candidates quantitatively. These enhancements can help to develop alternative screening methods that can be easily integrated into the clinical practice and can contribute to early cancer detection.