Orsolya Galamb

Dr. Orsolya Galamb


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 September 2019 in World Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
BBBarbara K Barták
Barbara K Barták
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
ZNZsófia B Nagy
Zsófia B Nagy
KSKrisztina A Szigeti
Krisztina A Szigeti
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
Diagnostic and prognostic potential of tissue and circulating long non-coding RNAs in colorectal tumors

2 September 2017 in Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BBBarbara Kinga Barták
Barbara Kinga Barták
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
BPBálint Péterfia
Bálint Péterfia
ÁPÁrpád V. Patai
Árpád V. Patai
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
Aberrant methylation is one of the most frequent epigenetic alterations that can contribute to tumor formation. Cell-free DNA can originate from tumor tissue; therefore, the evaluation of methylation markers in cell-free DNA can be a promising method for cancer screening. Our aim was to develop a panel of biomarkers with altered methylation along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence in both colonic tissue and plasma. Methylation of selected CpG sites in healthy colonic (n = 15), adenoma (n = 15), and colorectal cancer (n = 15) tissues was analyzed by pyrosequencing. MethyLight PCR was applied to study the DNA methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2, and PRIMA1 gene promoters in 121 plasma and 32 biopsy samples. The effect of altered promoter methylation on protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. Significantly higher (P < 0.05) DNA methylation levels were detected in the promoter regions of all 4 markers, both in CRC and adenoma tissues compared with healthy controls. Methylation of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2, and PRIMA1 promoter sequences was observed in 85.1%, 72.3%, 89.4%, and 80.9% of plasma samples from patients with CRC and 89.2%, 83.8%, 81.1% and 70.3% from adenoma patients, respectively. When applied as a panel, CRC patients could be distinguished from controls with 91.5% sensitivity and 97.3% specificity [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.978], while adenoma samples could be differentiated with 89.2% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity (AUC = 0.937). Immunohistochemical analysis indicated decreasing protein levels of all 4 markers along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Our findings suggest that this methylation biomarker panel allows non-invasive detection of colorectal adenoma and cancer from plasma samples.

1 January 2008 in Disease Markers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
BGBalazs Gyorffy
Balazs Gyorffy
FSFerenc Sipos
Ferenc Sipos
SSSándor Spisák
Sándor Spisák
ANAnna Mária Németh
Anna Mária Németh
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
Gene expression analysis of colon biopsies using high‐density oligonucleotide microarrays can contribute to the understanding of local pathophysiological alterations and to functional classification of adenoma (15 samples), colorectal carcinomas (CRC) (15) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) (14). Total RNA was extracted, amplified and biotinylated from frozen colonic biopsies. Genome‐wide gene expression profile was evaluated by HGU133plus2 microarrays and verified by RT‐PCR. We applied two independent methods for data normalization and used PAM for feature selection. Leave one‐out stepwise discriminant analysis was performed. Top validated genes included collagenIVα1, lipocalin‐2, calumenin, aquaporin‐8 genes in CRC; CD44, met proto‐oncogene, chemokine ligand‐12, ADAM‐like decysin‐1 and ATP‐binding casette‐A8 genes in adenoma; and lipocalin‐2, ubiquitin D and IFITM2 genes in IBD. Best differentiating markers between Ulcerative colitis and Crohn′s disease were cyclin‐G2; tripartite motif‐containing‐31; TNFR shedding aminopeptidase regulator‐1 and AMICA. The discriminant analysis was able to classify the samples in overall 96.2% using 7 discriminatory genes (indoleamine‐pyrrole‐2,3‐dioxygenase, ectodermal‐neural cortex, TIMP3, fucosyltransferase‐8, collectin sub‐family member 12, carboxypeptidase D, and transglutaminase‐2). Using routine biopsy samples we successfully performed whole genomic microarray analysis to identify discriminative signatures. Our results provide further insight into the pathophysiological background of colonic diseases. The results set up data warehouse which can be mined further.

26 January 2011 in Pathology and Oncology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KTKinga Tóth
Kinga Tóth
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
SSSándor Spisák
Sándor Spisák
BWBarnabás Wichmann
Barnabás Wichmann
Ferenc SiposFerenc Sipos
Ferenc Sipos
ZTZsolt Tulassay
Zsolt Tulassay

1 July 2016 in Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
BPBálint Péterfia
Bálint Péterfia
ICIstvan Csabai
Istvan Csabai
ABAndrás Bodor
András Bodor
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
The WNT signaling pathway has an essential role in colorectal carcinogenesis and progression, which involves a cascade of genetic and epigenetic changes. We aimed to analyze DNA methylation affecting the WNT pathway genes in colorectal carcinogenesis in promoter and gene body regions using whole methylome analysis in 9 colorectal cancer, 15 adenoma, and 6 normal tumor adjacent tissue (NAT) samples by methyl capture sequencing. Functional methylation was confirmed on 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine-treated colorectal cancer cell line datasets. In parallel with the DNA methylation analysis, mutations of WNT pathway genes (APC, β-catenin/CTNNB1) were analyzed by 454 sequencing on GS Junior platform. Most differentially methylated CpG sites were localized in gene body regions (95% of WNT pathway genes). In the promoter regions, 33 of the 160 analyzed WNT pathway genes were differentially methylated in colorectal cancer vs. normal, including hypermethylated AXIN2, CHP1, PRICKLE1, SFRP1, SFRP2, SOX17, and hypomethylated CACYBP, CTNNB1, MYC; 44 genes in adenoma vs. NAT; and 41 genes in colorectal cancer vs. adenoma comparisons. Hypermethylation of AXIN2, DKK1, VANGL1, and WNT5A gene promoters was higher, while those of SOX17, PRICKLE1, DAAM2, and MYC was lower in colon carcinoma compared to adenoma. Inverse correlation between expression and methylation was confirmed in 23 genes, including APC, CHP1, PRICKLE1, PSEN1, and SFRP1. Differential methylation affected both canonical and noncanonical WNT pathway genes in colorectal normal-adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Aberrant DNA methylation appears already in adenomas as an early event of colorectal carcinogenesis.

1 October 2008 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OGOrsolya Galamb
Orsolya Galamb
FSFerenc Sipos
Ferenc Sipos
Norbert SolymosiNorbert Solymosi
Norbert Solymosi
SSSánDor Spisák
SánDor Spisák
TKTibor KrenácS
Tibor KrenácS
BMBélA Molnár
BélA Molnár
Purpose: Gene expression profile (GEP)–based classification of colonic diseases is a new method for diagnostic purposes. Our aim was to develop diagnostic mRNA expression patterns that may establish the basis of a new molecular biological diagnostic method. Experimental Design: Total RNA was extracted, amplified, and biotinylated from frozen colonic biopsies of patients with colorectal cancer (n = 22), adenoma (n = 20), hyperplastic polyp (n = 11), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 21), and healthy normal controls (n = 11), as well as peripheral blood samples of 19 colorectal cancer and 11 healthy patients. Genome-wide gene expression profile was evaluated by HGU133plus2 microarrays. To identify the differentially expressed features, the significance analysis of microarrays and, for classification, the prediction analysis of microarrays were used. Expression patterns were validated by real-time PCR. Tissue microarray immunohistochemistries were done on tissue samples of 121 patients. Results: Adenoma samples could be distinguished from hyperplastic polyps by the expression levels of nine genes including ATP-binding cassette family A, member 8, insulin-like growth factor 1 and glucagon (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 90.91%). Between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic adenomas, 65 classifier probesets such as aquaporin 1, CXCL10, and APOD (90.91/100) were identified; between colorectal cancer and adenoma, 61 classifier probesets including axin 2, von Willebrand factor, tensin 1, and gremlin 1 (90.91/100) were identified. Early- and advanced-stage colorectal carcinomas could be distinguished using 34 discriminatory transcripts (100/66.67). Conclusions: Whole genomic microarray analysis using routine biopsy samples is suitable for the identification of discriminative signatures for differential diagnostic purposes. Our results may be the basis for new GEP-based diagnostic methods. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(10):2835–45)