Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) is advocated for achieving sustainable transportation through development around transit stations. TOD’s global implementation revealed varied outcomes, with many cities failing to achieve the intended objectives. TOD implementation in the Jakarta Metropolitan area still in its infancy. Through a geospatial information system and a survey of 400 commuters who live inside the 1 km radius of planned TOD, this longitudinal study aimed to examine an eight-year lapse between 2013 and 2020 of changes in two aspects, specifically land-use and spatial distribution as well as commuters’ travel behavior and preferences in TOD implementation and travel changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Key findings are as follows: increased diversity in the residential function around planned TOD areas in the Jakarta capital and a decrease in the suburbs, reflecting the commuters’ improved readiness to reside in planned TOD areas. Furthermore, kinship relations were the commuters’ main reason when selecting house locations, with no capacity to change their workplaces. A significant increase in public facilities at the expense of green open space (GOS) indicates that TOD implementation was conducted by the government with the sole authority to manage GOS, lacking private sector involvement. The cost factor was the most dominant reason for the commuter’s use of public transportation, instead of new transport modes such as MRT and LRT. Moreover, the commuter’s travel behavior in all studied transit stations, whilst it showed evidence of changes in time and frequency, was not greatly influenced by the COVID-19 related restrictions.

This study investigates one notable result that the REDD+ (‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stocks and conservation’) initiative effected within Indonesia’s forest institutions. It argues that during its interplay with existing National forest institutions REDD+ produced a significant benefit; namely, the ‘one map initiative’ (OMI) being the government’s response to the call for greater transparency and enabling of REDD+ implementation. It asks: “Does the ‘One Map Initiative’ signify a switch to a new path of map-making, or is it just another innovation within an existing path dependence of forest governance?” Through eighty semi-structured interviews with ‘REDD+ policy actors’ and the deployment of ‘path dependence’ theory, this study seeks to determine the extent to which the REDD+ initiative created a ‘critical juncture’ (i.e., momentum for institutions to move to a new path). This study maps the institutional path dependence within forest-mapping as a means for the state to gain control of forest resources. In its development process the OMI has shown its ability to break the old path-dependence of map-making (e.g., lack of transparency, low level of public participation, and poor coordination amongst ministries). Moreover, this paper identified several historical events (i.e., ‘critical junctures’) that preceded the REDD+ initiative as contributing factors to the relative success of REDD+ in effecting forest governance reform.

Urban sprawl in Jakarta Metropolitan area, driven by gentrification, necessitates Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) areas for mixed-use development to reduce private vehicle-dependent commuting, addressing sustainability issues. This development needs to be supported by designs that reflect the commuters' needs and preferences based on the local socio-economic context, but the existing Government's guidelines do not adequately represent this. According to this issue, Response to this issue, this study aims to propose reforms in spatial mixed-use design in the Jakarta Metropolitan TOD area using the Design Thinking method approach to address the commuters' needs and preferences. Based on this approach, data was collected through a survey of 1,697 respondents, followed by observations in four TOD zones scattered across urban and suburban regions in the Jakarta metropolitan area. These data were analyzed using multimethod, consisting of regression, weighting, descriptive and spatial analysis. The study suggests that middle-class working female commuters, with busy social roles, long travel distances, and high expenses, require mixed-use TOD housing. Design priorities include affordability, accessibility, and facility completeness, with Green Open Space as a top priority. The reform focuses to provide affordable rental housing and promote inclusive gender accessibility. These explanations conclude that major reforms are needed for TOD mixed-use design implementation and guideline, focusing on gender inclusive approaches that classified into urban and suburban areas with the largest proportions of GOS.

Seagrasses perform various critical functions within social–ecological systems, though populations have declined drastically. Restoring seagrass is crucial, requiring holistic consideration of ecological and human dimensions. To date, biophysical factors predominantly guide restoration and marine spatial planning (MSP). Sociocultural data underpin optimal and just restoration design, but remain a “missing layer” in MSP. To address this gap, we combined participatory mapping and ground-truthed remote sensing to map seagrass distribution, human activities, and place values in Sanday, UK. Local knowledge guided in situ surveys, co-producing Sanday’s first scientific seagrass records. We “found” two meadows absent from current seagrass modelling, mostly within protected areas, and highlighted corresponding human activities (notably shellfisheries) and values (humanistic and scientific). We propose three restoration priority sites, given seagrass extent, habitat protection, and compatible activities and values. This study demonstrates potential for transdisciplinary mapping to improve restoration planning, addressing the missing sociocultural layer and key gaps within MSP processes.