Errors in emergency ultrasound (US) have been representing an increasing problem in recent years thanks to several unique features related to both the inherent characteristics of the discipline and to the latest developments, which every medical operator should be aware of. Because of the subjective nature of the interpretation of emergency US findings, it is more prone to errors than other diagnostic imaging modalities. The misinterpretation of US images should therefore be considered as a serious risk in diagnosis. The etiology of error is multi-factorial: it depends on environmental factors, patients and the technical skills of the operator; it is influenced by intrinsic US artifacts, poor clinical correlation, US-setting errors and anatomical variants; and it is conditioned by the lack of a methodologically correct clinical approach and excessive diagnostic confidence too. In this review, we evaluate the common and uncommon sources of diagnostic errors in emergency US during clinical practice, showing how to recognize and avoid them.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIP) is a recognised but underreported entity in the literature. Immunotherapy drugs have been described as one possible emerging cause, although the pathogenic mechanism is still largely unclear. To date, only a few cases have been reported, even if in recent times there is an over-increasing awareness of this pathologic entity. The imaging-based diagnosis of DIP can be difficult to establish, representing a real challenge for a radiologist, especially when the inflammatory disease appears as a focal mass suspicious for a malignancy. Case report: We herein report the case of a 71-year-old man with a known history of partially responsive lung adenocarcinoma subtype with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, who underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging follow-up after one year of immunotherapy. The exam revealed a stocky/packed lesion in the pancreatic body, with increased ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation highly suggestive of pancreatic cancer, which finally was proven to be a DIP induced by immunotherapy. Conclusion: Distinguishing between focal DIP and pancreatic neoplasm is, therefore, crucial for timely therapeutic management and prognostic stratification. A deep knowledge of possible imaging pitfalls coupled with a comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessment is pivotal to avoid any delays in diagnosis.

Idiopathic basal ganglia calcification (IBGC), known as Fahr's disease, is a rare neurological disorder characterized by metabolic, biochemical, neuroradiological and neuropsychiatric alterations caused by symmetrical and bilateral intracranial calcifications. The disease has, in most cases, an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and genetic heterogeneity. Overlap of neuropsychiatric symptoms is common with movement disorders accounted for 55% of the manifestation. Here we present the case of a 58-year-old woman, presenting to the emergency department because of an accidental fall. Her past medical history was unremarkable and she denied any neurological symptoms a part from insomnia and anxiety. Patient was sent to the emergency department to perform a Brain Computed Tomography (CT) exam that showed bilateral symmetrical calcifications in cerebellar white matter, the corpus striatum, the posterior thalami, and the centrum semiovale of both cerebral hemispheres. Beeing a case of IBGC without relevant symptoms, diagnosis was mainly obtained thanks to the characteristics features of CT examination.

Neonatal breast enlargement is a hormone-related condition, mostly asymptomatic\physiological, with a well-recognizable sonographic appearance but limited data in the literature. It can be uni-or bilateral. Typically described in the first week of life, the transient lesion disappears spontaneously within 6 months. The main differential diagnosis is neonatal mastitis, a breast tissue infection that requires a specific antibiotic therapy. Knowledge of clinical and imaging findings is crucial, and ultrasound represents a reliable tool which allows a quick identification and an excellent examination of neonatal breast abnormalities. We aim to highlight sonographic classic features of benign neonatal breast enlargement showing how ultrasound rules out real breast masses helping to differentiate between it and mastitis when clinical and laboratory data are inconclusive. We describe a 2-day-old male with bilateral breast swelling more pronounced on the right side.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS) is the application of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to traditional ultrasound. Our aim is to report the use of CEUS for a prompt assessment of a suspected secondary splenic lymphoma in a child, which, in our experience, has allowed an accurate description of the parenchymal perfusion and vascularization pattern, leading to a confident diagnosis. We suggest that CEUS will replace Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or Computed tomography (CT) as standard imaging option for differential diagnosis of spleen lesions in pediatric population. As a result this will lead to decreasing the overall use of ionizing radiation and reducing the time interval to a certain diagnosis.