Nicolas Brüggemann

Nicolas Brüggemann

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 May 2016 in Vadose Zone Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HVHarry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken
ASAndrea Schnepf
Andrea Schnepf
Jan HopmansJan Hopmans
Jan Hopmans
MJM. Javaux
M. Javaux
DODani Or
Dani Or
IYI.M. Young
I.M. Young
Core Ideas: A community effort is needed to move soil modeling forward. Establishing an international soil modeling consortium is key in this respect. There is a need to better integrate existing knowledge in soil models. Integration of data and models is a key challenge in soil modeling. The remarkable complexity of soil and its importance to a wide range of ecosystem services presents major challenges to the modeling of soil processes. Although major progress in soil models has occurred in the last decades, models of soil processes remain disjointed between disciplines or ecosystem services, with considerable uncertainty remaining in the quality of predictions and several challenges that remain yet to be addressed. First, there is a need to improve exchange of knowledge and experience among the different disciplines in soil science and to reach out to other Earth science communities. Second, the community needs to develop a new generation of soil models based on a systemic approach comprising relevant physical, chemical, and biological processes to address critical knowledge gaps in our understanding of soil processes and their interactions. Overcoming these challenges will facilitate exchanges between soil modeling and climate, plant, and social science modeling communities. It will allow us to contribute to preserve and improve our assessment of ecosystem services and advance our understanding of climate‐change feedback mechanisms, among others, thereby facilitating and strengthening communication among scientific disciplines and society. We review the role of modeling soil processes in quantifying key soil processes that shape ecosystem services, with a focus on provisioning and regulating services. We then identify key challenges in modeling soil processes, including the systematic incorporation of heterogeneity and uncertainty, the integration of data and models, and strategies for effective integration of knowledge on physical, chemical, and biological soil processes. We discuss how the soil modeling community could best interface with modern modeling activities in other disciplines, such as climate, ecology, and plant research, and how to weave novel observation and measurement techniques into soil models. We propose the establishment of an international soil modeling consortium to coherently advance soil modeling activities and foster communication with other Earth science disciplines. Such a consortium should promote soil modeling platforms and data repository for model development, calibration and intercomparison essential for addressing contemporary challenges.

1 October 2009 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DFD. Fowler
D. Fowler
KPKim Pilegaard
Kim Pilegaard
MSM.A. Sutton
M.A. Sutton
PAPer Ambus
Per Ambus
MRM. Raivonen
M. Raivonen
JEJan Willem Erisman
Jan Willem Erisman

2 August 2022 in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HVHarry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken
WAWulf Amelung
Wulf Amelung
SBSara L. Bauke
Sara L. Bauke
HBHeye Bogena
Heye Bogena
NBNicolas Brüggemann
Nicolas Brüggemann
YZYonggen Zhang
Yonggen Zhang
Soil hydrological processes (SHP) support ecosystems, modulate the impact of climate change on terrestrial systems and control feedback mechanisms between water, energy and biogeochemical cycles. However, land-use changes and extreme events are increasingly impacting these processes. In this Review, we describe SHP across scales and examine their links with soil properties, ecosystem processes and climate. Soil structure influences SHP such as infiltration, soil water redistribution and root water uptake on small scales. On local scales, SHP are driven by root water uptake, vegetation and groundwater dynamics. Regionally, SHP are impacted by extreme events such as droughts, floods, heatwaves and land-use change; however, antecedent and current SHP partially determine the broader effects of extreme events. Emerging technologies such as wireless and automated sensing, soil moisture observation through novel synthetic aperture radars satellites, big data analysis and machine learning approaches offer unique opportunities to advance soil hydrology. These advances, in tandem with the inclusion of more key soil types and properties in models, will be pivotal in predicting the role of SHP during global change.

28 November 2011 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNicolas Brüggemann
Nicolas Brüggemann
AGA. Gessler
A. Gessler
ZKZ. Kayler
Z. Kayler
SKS. G. Keel
S. G. Keel
FBFranz Badeck
Franz Badeck
MBM. Bahn
M. Bahn
The terrestrial carbon (C) cycle has received increasing interest over the past few decades, however, there is still a lack of understanding of the fate of newly assimilated C allocated within plants and to the soil, stored within ecosystems and lost to the atmosphere. Stable carbon isotope studies can give novel insights into these issues. In this review we provide an overview of an emerging picture of plant-soil-atmosphere C fluxes, as based on C isotope studies, and identify processes determining related C isotope signatures. The first part of the review focuses on isotopic fractionation processes within plants during and after photosynthesis. The second major part elaborates on plant-internal and plant-rhizosphere C allocation patterns at different time scales (diel, seasonal, interannual), including the speed of C transfer and time lags in the coupling of assimilation and respiration, as well as the magnitude and controls of plant-soil C allocation and respiratory fluxes. Plant responses to changing environmental conditions, the functional relationship between the physiological and phenological status of plants and C transfer, and interactions between C, water and nutrient dynamics are discussed. The role of the C counterflow from the rhizosphere to the aboveground parts of the plants, e.g. via CO2 dissolved in the xylem water or as xylem-transported sugars, is highlighted. The third part is centered around belowground C turnover, focusing especially on above- and belowground litter inputs, soil organic matter formation and turnover, production and loss of dissolved organic C, soil respiration and CO2 fixation by soil microbes. Furthermore, plant controls on microbial communities and activity via exudates and litter production as well as microbial community effects on C mineralization are reviewed. A further part of the paper is dedicated to physical interactions between soil CO2 and the soil matrix, such as CO2 diffusion and dissolution processes within the soil profile. Finally, we highlight state-of-the-art stable isotope methodologies and their latest developments. From the presented evidence we conclude that there exists a tight coupling of physical, chemical and biological processes involved in C cycling and C isotope fluxes in the plant-soil-atmosphere system. Generally, research using information from C isotopes allows an integrated view of the different processes involved. However, complex interactions among the range of processes complicate or currently impede the interpretation of isotopic signals in CO2 or organic compounds at the plant and ecosystem level. This review tries to identify present knowledge gaps in correctly interpreting carbon stable isotope signals in the plant-soil-atmosphere system and how future research approaches could contribute to closing these gaps.

6 March 2017 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMinghua Zhou
Minghua Zhou
BZBo Zhu
Bo Zhu
SWShijie Wang
Shijie Wang
XZXinyu Zhu
Xinyu Zhu
HVHarry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken
NBNicolas Brüggemann
Nicolas Brüggemann

8 April 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BWBenjamin Wolf
Benjamin Wolf
XZXunhua Zheng
Xunhua Zheng
NBNicolas Brüggemann
Nicolas Brüggemann
WCWeiwei Chen
Weiwei Chen
MDMichael Dannenmann
Michael Dannenmann
KBKlaus Butterbach-Bahl
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl