Objective: The aim of this study was to establish the test–retest reliability of metrics obtained from wearable inertial sensors that reflect turning performance during tasks designed to imitate various turns in daily activity. Methods: Seventy-one adults who were healthy completed 3 turning tasks: a 1-minute walk along a 6-m walkway, a modified Illinois Agility Test (mIAT), and a complex turning course (CTC). Peak axial turning and rotational velocity (yaw angular velocity) were extracted from wearable inertial sensors on the head, trunk, and lumbar spine. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were established to assess the test–retest reliability of average peak turning speed for each task. Lap time was collected for reliability analysis as well. Results: Turning speed across all tasks demonstrated good to excellent reliability, with the highest reliability noted for the CTC (45-degree turns: ICC = 0.73–0.81; 90-degree turns: ICC = 0.71–0.83; and 135-degree turns: ICC = 0.72–0.80). The reliability of turning speed during 180-degree turns from the 1-minute walk was consistent across all body segments (ICC = 0.74–0.76). mIAT reliability ranged from fair to excellent (end turns: ICC = 0.52–0.72; mid turns: ICC = 0.50–0.56; and slalom turns: ICC = 0.66–0.84). The CTC average lap time demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.69), and the mIAT average lap time test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.91). Conclusion: Turning speed measured by inertial sensors is a reliable outcome across a variety of ecologically valid turning tasks that can be easily tested in a clinical environment. Impact: Turning performance is a reliable and important measure that should be included in clinical assessments and clinical trials.

Alterations in head and trunk kinematics during activities of daily living can be difficult to recognize and quantify with visual observation. Incorporating wearable sensors allows for accurate and measurable assessment of movement. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of wearable sensors and data processing algorithms to discern motion restrictions during activities of daily living. Accelerometer data was collected with wearable sensors from 10 healthy adults (age 39.5 ± 12.47) as they performed daily living simulated tasks: coin pick up (pitch plane task), don/doff jacket (yaw plane task), self-paced community ambulation task [CAT] (pitch and yaw plane task) without and with a rigid cervical collar. Paired t-tests were used to discern differences between non-restricted (no collared) performance and restricted (collared) performance of tasks. Significant differences in head rotational velocity (jacket p = 0.03, CAT-pitch p < 0.001, CAT-yaw p < 0.001), head rotational amplitude (coin p = 0.03, CAT-pitch p < 0.001, CAT-yaw p < 0.001), trunk rotational amplitude (jacket p = 0.01, CAT-yaw p = 0.005), and head–trunk coupling (jacket p = 0.007, CAT-yaw p = 0.003) were captured by wearable sensors between the two conditions. Alterations in turning movement were detected at the head and trunk during daily living tasks. These results support the ecological validity of using wearable sensors to quantify movement alterations during real-world scenarios.

Background and Purpose: Surgical removal of a vestibular schwannoma (vestibular schwannoma resection; VSR) results in a unilateral vestibular hypofunction with complaints of dizziness and imbalance. Although the anatomic lesion is permanent, recovery of balance and diminution of dizziness occurs through central neurophysiologic compensation. Compensation of the system is maintained through daily activity. Unfortunately, interruption of stimulus, such as decreased activities due to illness, can cause decompensation. Decompensation is described as the return of symptoms consistent with that experienced during the initial insult/injury (eg, dizziness, oscillopsia, balance difficulty). This case study describes a reoccurrence of vestibular dysfunction in a person with a history of VSR following hospitalization and protracted recovery from a COVID-19 infection. It further documents her recovery that may be a result of vestibular rehabilitation. Case Description: A 49-year-old woman (M.W.) with a surgical history of VSR (10 years prior) and a medical history of significant COVID-19 infection, resulting in an intensive care unit stay and prolonged use of supplemental oxygen, presented to physical therapy with persistent dizziness and imbalance. The video head impulse test confirmed unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Intervention: M.W. attended biweekly vestibular rehabilitation for 6 weeks and completed daily home exercises. Outcomes: At discharge, M.W. demonstrated improvements in patient-reported outcomes (Dizziness Handicap Inventory), functional testing (MiniBEST, 2-Minute Walk Test), and gaze stability measures (video head impulse testing, dynamic visual acuity). Discussion: Vestibular decompensation preluded by a COVID-19 infection caused a significant decrease in functional mobility. Vestibular rehabilitation targeted at gaze and postural stability effectively reduced symptoms and facilitated recovery to M.W.’s pre-COVID-19 level of function. Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A458).