Purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become an excellent non-invasive alternative for many patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and adrenal malignancies (AM). The aims of this study were to analyse how tumor-, patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the outcomes and side effects of SBRT and to assess its benefits as an alternative to surgery. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included 25 lesions in 23 patients treated with SBRT using different devices (LINAC, CyberKnife^® and Tomotherapy^®). A multivariate linear regression was used for the statistical study. Results: Local control time was higher than six months in more than 87% of patients and treatment response was complete for 73.68%. There was an overall 2-year survival of 40% and none of the deaths were secondary to renal or adrenal local progression. Patients treated with lower total radiation dose (mean [m] = 55 Gy) but less fractions with more dose per fraction (> 8.5 Gy) showed better outcome. Patients with previous chemotherapy and surgery treatments also showed higher complete response and disease-free survival (> 6 months). Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of ultra-hypofractionated regimens with higher doses per session. Thus, the referral of patients with RCC and AM to Radiotherapy and Oncology departments should be encouraged supporting the role of SBRT as a minimally invasive and outpatient treatment.

Background/Objectives: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 15–40% of men within five years of radical prostatectomy (RP), presenting a major challenge for long-term disease control. While salvage radiotherapy (SRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are established post-RP interventions, the optimal integration of ADT with SRT—regarding timing, duration, and patient selection—remains unclear. We aimed to synthesize current clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of combining ADT with SRT in patients experiencing BCR after RP. Methods: A narrative review was conducted, encompassing retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (notably RTOG 9601, GETUG-AFU 16, RADICALS-HD, and SPPORT), and meta-analyses. Studies were selected based on relevance to combined ADT + SRT versus SRT alone, with outcomes of interest including biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Trial characteristics, ADT duration (short-term [4–6 months] versus long-term [≥24 months]), radiation scheme, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) thresholds at SRT initiation were extracted and compared. Results: The combination of ADT and SRT represents a promising strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer with BCR after RP. Current evidence supports its benefit in terms of disease control and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. Conclusions: Differences in inclusion criteria, ADT duration, and the heterogeneous quality of the available studies limit the formulation of universal recommendations. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to optimize therapeutic approaches and personalize treatment based on each patient’s risk profile.

This retrospective study aimed to provide some clinical outcomes regarding effectiveness, toxicity, and quality of life in PCa patients treated with dose-escalated moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT). Patients received HFRT to a total dose of 66 Gy in 22 fractions (3 Gy/fraction) delivered via volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in 2011–2016. Treatment effectiveness was measured by the biochemical failure-free survival rate. Toxicity was assessed according to the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and quality of life according to the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). In this regard, quality of life (QoL) was measured longitudinally, at a median of 2 and 5 years after RT. Enrolled patients had low-risk (40.2%), intermediate-risk (47.5%), and high-risk (12.3%) PCa. Median follow-up was 75 months. The biochemical failure-free survival rate was 94.2%. The incidence of acute grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 9.84% and 28.69%, respectively. The incidence rate of late grade 2 or higher GI and GU toxicity was 1.64% and 4.10%, respectively. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores showed that the majority of patients maintained their QoL. HFRT to 66 Gy with VMAT was associated with adequate biochemical control, low toxicity and good reported GU and GI quality of life.

Background: Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is an established treatment for biochemical recurrence (BR) after prostatectomy. Moderate hypofractionation offers potential radiobiological and logistical advantages, although evidence for non-escalated postoperative RT schedules remains limited. This study evaluated oncological outcomes in patients with a hypofractionated postoperative RT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 189 patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative hypofractionated RT to the prostate bed (55 Gy in 20 fractions). RT was delivered as salvage or adjuvant treatment according to pathological and biochemical findings. Survival outcomes and predictive factors were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable analyses. Results: Most patients received salvage RT, with a median pre-RT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 0.61 ng/mL. High-risk pathological features were common, and 26.3% developed BR after treatment. 5-year disease-free survival reached 93.8%, while 5-year overall survival (OS) was 96.6%. Postsurgical grade, pre-RT PSA, nodal involvement, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were associated with outcomes. Conclusions: Non-escalated hypofractionated postoperative RT yields favorable local disease control accompanied by acceptable safety toxicity profiles, supporting its application as an effective and practical alternative to conventional fractionation regimens. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to clarify the potential therapeutic role of dose escalation in routine postoperative treatment setting.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy in men worldwide, and both androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) are key components of its management. However, these treatments significantly affect bone health by inducing bone mineral density (BMD) loss, osteopenia, osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. ADT promotes a high bone turnover state through hormonal suppression and molecular mechanisms involving increased RANKL expression and osteoclast activation. RT generates direct cytotoxic damage and inflammatory changes that compromise bone microarchitecture. Combined ADT + RT exerts synergistic detrimental effects. This narrative review synthesizes the molecular basis, clinical evidence, preventive strategies and emerging technologies related to bone health in men with PCa undergoing ADT and/or RT.