Spinal metastasis may occur in 40–70% of patients with cancer. Symptoms can vary from pain to spinal cord compression (SCC) and can affect their quality of life (QoL). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows dose escalation of spinal tumor metastases, minimizing doses to organs at risk and improving pain control. The aim of this study is to retrospectively describe our institution’s experience with robotic SBRT (CyberKnife^®, Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for spinal metastases, in terms of feasibility, oncological results, toxicities, and pain relief observed. In total, 25 patients with 43 lesions were assessed, most of them with dorsal metastases (48.8%). The median total dose was 27 Gy (16–35 Gy), the median number of fractions administered was 3 (1–5), and the median dose per fraction was 9 Gy. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale at baseline and at the end of treatment. The statistically significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01) was associated with the total dose of radiotherapy delivered (p < 0.01). Only one patient developed grade 3 dermatitis. Female gender, adenocarcinoma tumors, and lack of previous surgery were associated with better response to SBRT (p < 0.05). Robotic spine SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and improves patients’ QoL through a statistically significant reduction in pain, so it should be offered to patients at an early stage in their process.

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become an excellent non-invasive alternative for many patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and adrenal malignancies (AM). The aims of this study were to analyse how tumor-, patient- and treatment-related factors may influence the outcomes and side effects of SBRT and to assess its benefits as an alternative to surgery. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included 25 lesions in 23 patients treated with SBRT using different devices (LINAC, CyberKnife^® and Tomotherapy^®). A multivariate linear regression was used for the statistical study. Results: Local control time was higher than six months in more than 87% of patients and treatment response was complete for 73.68%. There was an overall 2-year survival of 40% and none of the deaths were secondary to renal or adrenal local progression. Patients treated with lower total radiation dose (mean [m] = 55 Gy) but less fractions with more dose per fraction (> 8.5 Gy) showed better outcome. Patients with previous chemotherapy and surgery treatments also showed higher complete response and disease-free survival (> 6 months). Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of ultra-hypofractionated regimens with higher doses per session. Thus, the referral of patients with RCC and AM to Radiotherapy and Oncology departments should be encouraged supporting the role of SBRT as a minimally invasive and outpatient treatment.

This retrospective study aimed to provide some clinical outcomes regarding effectiveness, toxicity, and quality of life in PCa patients treated with dose-escalated moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT). Patients received HFRT to a total dose of 66 Gy in 22 fractions (3 Gy/fraction) delivered via volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in 2011–2016. Treatment effectiveness was measured by the biochemical failure-free survival rate. Toxicity was assessed according to the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and quality of life according to the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). In this regard, quality of life (QoL) was measured longitudinally, at a median of 2 and 5 years after RT. Enrolled patients had low-risk (40.2%), intermediate-risk (47.5%), and high-risk (12.3%) PCa. Median follow-up was 75 months. The biochemical failure-free survival rate was 94.2%. The incidence of acute grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 9.84% and 28.69%, respectively. The incidence rate of late grade 2 or higher GI and GU toxicity was 1.64% and 4.10%, respectively. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores showed that the majority of patients maintained their QoL. HFRT to 66 Gy with VMAT was associated with adequate biochemical control, low toxicity and good reported GU and GI quality of life.

Background/Objectives: In Spain, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death, with only 20% of patients eligible for surgery at diagnosis. For the remaining majority, prognosis is poor and effective non-surgical strategies are needed. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) may facilitate the delivery of ablative doses of radiation safely with low toxicity. This study reports the first national experience in Spain with SMART for patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer and evaluates its feasibility, safety, and early clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted including 28 patients with histologically confirmed BRPC or LAPC treated between August 2023 and December 2024. All patients received induction chemotherapy—mainly FOLFIRINOX (57.1%)—followed by SMART delivered in five fractions (40–50 Gy) using a 0.35T MR-guided linear accelerator. Daily online adaptive recontouring and replanning were performed for all 140 treatment fractions. Toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v5.0, and survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: The median patient age was 67 years, and 71.4% of tumors were located in the pancreatic head. At a median follow-up of 7.4 months after SMART (12.25 months from diagnosis), 6-month local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 89.3% from the start of SMART and 82.1% from diagnosis. Distant progression-free survival (DPFS) at 6 and 12 months was 92.9% and 68.2%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 months, and the median treatment-free interval was 5.7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 6- and 12-month OS rates were 89.3% and 74.1%, respectively. Treatment-related toxicity was limited to grade 2 abdominal pain in 14.3% of patients, with no grade ≥3 adverse events attributed to SMART. Conclusions: SMART is a feasible and safe treatment modality for BRPC and LAPC in real-world clinical practice. These encouraging early outcomes support further clinical investigation and broader implementation.