Umberto Vitiello

Dr. Umberto Vitiello

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2019 in Automation in Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UVUmberto Vitiello
Umberto Vitiello
VCV. Ciotta
V. Ciotta
ASA. Salzano
A. Salzano
DAD. Asprone
D. Asprone
GMG. Manfredi
G. Manfredi
ECE. Cosenza
E. Cosenza

10 November 2016 in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
UVUmberto Vitiello
Umberto Vitiello
DAD. Asprone
D. Asprone
MLM. Di Ludovico
M. Di Ludovico
APA. Prota
A. Prota

8 June 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gerardo Maria MauroGerardo Maria Mauro
Gerardo Maria Mauro
CMCostantino Menna
Costantino Menna
UVUmberto Vitiello
Umberto Vitiello
Domenico AsproneDomenico Asprone
Domenico Asprone
Fabrizio AscioneFabrizio Ascione
Fabrizio Ascione
GVGiuseppe Peter Vanoli
Giuseppe Peter Vanoli
Most European buildings built before 1980s were constructed without any design concern for energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. In addition to this issue, over the last decades, the essential need of safer buildings has progressively attracted the interest of scientific community and government institutions. However, the strong interaction between energy and structural aspects in building retrofit design has never been handled via robust and reliable approaches. The present study explores this knowledge gap by introducing a novel multi-step approach that addresses the retrofit of existing buildings by integrating energy, structural and economic aspects. To this end, a multi-stage energy optimization is carried out by implementing a genetic algorithm and a smart research strategy. Thus, the cost-optimal energy retrofit solution is identified and the impact of the expected economic losses due to seismic damage is assessed throughout the building lifecycle. The methodology is applied to a multi-story residential building, considering the effects of two different building locations, namely Milan and Norcia. These latter are characterized by similar climatic conditions but by a different level of seismic risk, which is higher for Norcia. The outcomes show that the estimated seismic economic losses associated with the energy retrofit solutions are strongly affected by the building location. Thus, the selection of the optimal energy retrofit measures should be related to the building structural behavior in order to achieve reliable economic and sustainability benefits.

8 December 2016 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UVUmberto Vitiello
Umberto Vitiello
Antonio SalzanoAntonio Salzano
Antonio Salzano
Domenico AsproneDomenico Asprone
Domenico Asprone
Marco Di LudovicoMarco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
In the last few years, the renovation and refurbishment of existing buildings have become the main activities of the construction industry. In particular, many studies have recently focused on the mechanical and energy performances of existing retrofitted/refurbished facilities, while some research has addressed the environmental effects of such operations. The present study aims to assess the environmental impact of some retrofit interventions on an existing reinforced concrete (RC) building. Once the structural requirements have been satisfied and the environmental effects of these retrofit solutions defined, the final purpose of this study is to identify the most environmentally sustainable retrofit strategy. The environmental impact of the structural retrofit options is assessed using a life-cycle assessment (LCA). This paper sets out a systematic approach that can be adopted when choosing the best structural retrofit option in terms of sustainability performance. The final aim of the study is to also provide a tool for researchers and practitioners that reflects a deep understanding of the sustainability aspects of retrofit operations and can be used for future researches or practical activities.