Background: Poor awareness of periodontal diseases and their consequences has been reported as the most frequent reason for periodontal treatment failure on a community basis. This study aims to identify the most relevant gaps of knowledge about periodontal diseases among the general public and to disclose whether these gaps are culturally consistent.Methods: Systematic searches were conducted of the EMBASE, PubMed, and SciELO databases (1998 to November 2014). The search strategy was “periodontitis OR periodontal disease” and “knowledge OR awareness” as keywords and free text. Papers were included if they reported on community‐based, quantitative studies undertaken on adult individuals.Results: A total of 2,330 references were identified (1,567 single papers), and six papers were finally selected. Raw data were grouped into nine dimensions of periodontal knowledge: 1) awareness; 2) etiology; 3) associated risks; 4) signs and symptoms; 5) risk factors; 6) treatment; 7) general knowledge; 8) prevention; and 9) attitudes. This classification recognized disease awareness (80%), etiology (75%), and periodontal‐related risks (71.43%) as the most important knowledge deficits among the general public. These findings were confirmed by weighted data analysis.Conclusions: The number of available community‐based investigations on periodontal knowledge is scarce and restricted to areas with a very high level of human development. Gaps of knowledge exist in every geographic area, with the most relevant issues of low awareness and poor knowledge about the etiology of periodontal diseases and their relation with systemic disorders. These results highlight the need for local, community‐based investigations about periodontal knowledge and barriers hampering early diagnosis, as well as for adequate educational interventions focused on these issues.

The etiologies of most chronic temporomandibular joint disorders are unknown. However, an association between habitual chewing on a particular side and chronic temporomandibular joint disorders has been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between sides (affected vs unaffected) of biodynamic factors (including lateral dental guidance determined by dental anatomy) or condylar path angles (determined by temporomandibular joint morphology) and chewing function (physiological alternate chewing vs single habitual chewing side). The study scope was to investigate possible etiological factors to improve the understanding of temporomandibular joint disorders. The null hypothesis was that no difference would be found between sides that are or are not affected by chronic temporomandibular joint disorders in chewing function or in levels of dental or temporomandibular joint remodeling. This cross-sectional, double-blind study involved 24 adults with substantial, chronic, unilateral symptoms diagnosed as temporomandibular joint disorders. Chewing function, temporomandibular joint remodeling (using axiography) and dental anatomy (lateral guidance angles using kinesiography) were assessed. Habitual chewing on one particular side was observed in 17 of 24 participants; significantly more (n=15) chewed on the affected side than on the unaffected side (P=0.002 in a two-tailed Fisher's exact test; risk estimate=4.5; 95% CI 1.326-15.277). The condylar path (CP) angle was steeper on the affected side than on the unaffected side (mean (standard deviation)=50.52° (9.98°) versus 45.50° (7.98°); P=0.002 in a two-tailed t-test). The lateral guidance (LG) angles were flatter on the affected side in all 24 participants. Our results suggest that habitual chewing on one side may be associated with increasing condylar path, with flattening lateral guidance angles, and also with chronic temporomandibular joint disorder on the habitual chewing side.

Oral cancer is a very serious public health problem in many parts of the world, particularly in developing countries, where about two-thirds of incident cases occur