Background Temporomandibular disorders are the most common cause of chronic orofacial pain, but, except where they occur subsequent to trauma, their cause remains unknown. This cross-sectional study assessed chewing function (habitual chewing side) and the differences of the chewing side and condylar path and lateral anterior guidance angles in participants with chronic unilateral temporomandibular disorder. This is the preliminary report of a randomized trial that aimed to test the effect of a new occlusal adjustment therapy. Methods The masticatory function of 21 randomly selected completely dentate participants with chronic temporomandibular disorders (all but one with unilateral symptoms) was assessed by observing them eat almonds, inspecting the lateral horizontal movement of the jaw, with kinesiography, and by means of interview. The condylar path in the sagittal plane and the lateral anterior guidance angles with respect to the Frankfort horizontal plane in the frontal plane were measured on both sides in each individual. Results Sixteen of 20 participants with unilateral symptoms chewed on the affected side; the concordance (Fisher’s exact test, P = .003) and the concordance-symmetry level (Kappa coefficient κ = 0.689; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.99; P = .002) were significant. The mean condylar path angle was steeper (53.47(10.88) degrees versus 46.16(7.25) degrees; P = .001), and the mean lateral anterior guidance angle was flatter (41.63(13.35) degrees versus 48.32(9.53) degrees P = .036) on the symptomatic side. Discussion The results of this study support the use of a new term based on etiology, “habitual chewing side syndrome”, instead of the nonspecific symptom-based “temporomandibular joint disorders”; this denomination is characterized in adults by a steeper condylar path, flatter lateral anterior guidance, and habitual chewing on the symptomatic side.

The study assessed the differences in electromyographic (EMG) activity recorded during clenching in women with chronic unilateral temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) as compared to control subjects. Seventy-five full dentate, normo-occlusion, right-handed, similarly aged female subjects were recruited. Twenty five subjects presented with right side TMD, 25 presented with left side TMD and 25 pain-free control subjects participated. Using integrated surface EMG over a 1 s contraction, the anterior temporalis and masseter muscles were evaluated bilaterally while subjects performed maximum voluntary clenching. Lower EMG activation was observed in patients with TMD as compared to control subjects (temporalis: 195.74+/-18.57 vs. 275.74+/-22.11, P=0.011; masseters: 151.09+/-17.37 vs. 283.29+/-31.87, P<0.001). An asymmetry index (SAI) was calculated to determine ratios of right to left sided activation. Patients with right-sided TMD demonstrated preferential use of their left-sided muscles (SAI -5.35+/-4.02) whereas patients with left-sided TMD demonstrated preferential use of their right-sided muscles (SAI 6.95+/-2.82), (P=0.016). This unilateral reduction in temporalis and masseter activity could be considered as a specific protective functional adaptation of the neuromuscular system due to nociceptive input. The asymmetry index (SAI) may be a useful measure in discriminating patients with right vs. left-sided TMD.

The etiologies of most chronic temporomandibular joint disorders are unknown. However, an association between habitual chewing on a particular side and chronic temporomandibular joint disorders has been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between sides (affected vs unaffected) of biodynamic factors (including lateral dental guidance determined by dental anatomy) or condylar path angles (determined by temporomandibular joint morphology) and chewing function (physiological alternate chewing vs single habitual chewing side). The study scope was to investigate possible etiological factors to improve the understanding of temporomandibular joint disorders. The null hypothesis was that no difference would be found between sides that are or are not affected by chronic temporomandibular joint disorders in chewing function or in levels of dental or temporomandibular joint remodeling. This cross-sectional, double-blind study involved 24 adults with substantial, chronic, unilateral symptoms diagnosed as temporomandibular joint disorders. Chewing function, temporomandibular joint remodeling (using axiography) and dental anatomy (lateral guidance angles using kinesiography) were assessed. Habitual chewing on one particular side was observed in 17 of 24 participants; significantly more (n=15) chewed on the affected side than on the unaffected side (P=0.002 in a two-tailed Fisher's exact test; risk estimate=4.5; 95% CI 1.326-15.277). The condylar path (CP) angle was steeper on the affected side than on the unaffected side (mean (standard deviation)=50.52° (9.98°) versus 45.50° (7.98°); P=0.002 in a two-tailed t-test). The lateral guidance (LG) angles were flatter on the affected side in all 24 participants. Our results suggest that habitual chewing on one side may be associated with increasing condylar path, with flattening lateral guidance angles, and also with chronic temporomandibular joint disorder on the habitual chewing side.