Vitamin D is a fat-soluble secosteroid, traditionally considered a key regulator of bone metabolism, calcium and phosphorous homeostasis. Its action is made possible through the binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), after which it directly and indirectly modulates the expression of thousands of genes. Vitamin D is important for brain development, mature brain activity and associated with many neurological diseases, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). High frequency of vitamin D deficiency in patients with Parkinson’s disease compared to control population was noted nearly twenty years ago. This finding is of interest given vitamin D’s neuroprotective effect, exerted by the action of neurotrophic factors, regulation of nerve growth or through protection against cytotoxicity. Vitamin D deficiency seems to be related to disease severity and disease progression, evaluated by Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale, but not with age of PD onset and duration of disease. Additionally, fall risk has been associated with lower vitamin D levels in PD. However, while the association between vitamin D and motor-symptoms seems to be possible, results of studies investigating the association with non-motor symptoms are conflicting. In addition, very little evidence exists regarding the possibility to use vitamin D supplementation to reduce clinical manifestations and disability in patients with PD. However, considering the positive balance between potential benefits against its limited risks, vitamin D supplementation for PD patients will probably be considered in the near future, if further confirmed in clinical studies.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor impairments and it is correlated with loss of bone mineral density. This study aimed to analyze the effects of resistance training on bone metabolism, systemic homeostasis, body composition, and physical performance in people with PD. Thirteen subjects (age 64.83 ± 5.70) with PD diagnosis were recruited. Participants performed neuromuscular tests, body composition assessment, and blood sample analysis at baseline, and after an 11 weeks-training period. Each training session lasted 90 min, three times a week. The participants had significant improvements in the timed up and go (p < 0.01), sit to stand (p < 0.01), dominant peg-board (p < 0.05), dominant foot-reaction time (p < 0.01), and functional reach tests (p < 0.05). They showed better pressure foot distributions in the left forefoot (p < 0.05) and hindfoot (p < 0.05) and increased cervical right lateral bending angle (p < 0.05). The protocol affects bone metabolism markers osteocalcin (p < 0.05), calcium (p < 0.01), PTH (p < 0.01), the C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) (p < 0.01), and vitamin D (p < 0.05). Eleven weeks of resistance training improved manual dexterity, static and dynamic balance, reaction time, cervical ROM, and reduced bone loss in people with PD.

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting men more frequently than women, a difference that might be due to many factors, including sexual hormones. Estrogens seem to confer a protective effect on the nigrostriatal pathway in experimental studies but their effects on cognition in patients with PD are unknown. Aim: To investigate the impact of the exogenous and endogenous estrogens on cognitive impairment in women with PD. Methods and materials: We recruited and consecutively interviewed outpatient women affected by PD. Each patient underwent a cognitive assessment via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA), an anamnestic collection of the reproductive lifespan variables and clinical features. We investigated if some of the reproductive lifespan variables investigated could predict cognition outcomes in post-menopausal women with PD. Results: A total of 90 women with PD were recruited. Women with MoCA ≥ 26 (n = 27) had a lower median age at menarche (11 [11,12] vs. 13 [12–14], p < 0.0001), lower disease duration in years (8.3 [6.1–12.7] vs. 9.4 [6–12.7], p = 0.6), and less advanced disease (1 [1,2] vs. 2 [1–3], p = 0.02). Among all the reproductive life-span variables, only earlier age at menarche significantly predicted higher scores on MoCA (aOR = 0.5 [0.3–0.8], p = 0.005). No other clinical and reproductive factors have been shown to have an influence on cognitive scores. Conclusions: Age at menarche correlated with cognitive outcomes. Our study suggests that earlier exposure to endogenous estrogens during a phase of development and plasticity of the brain might preserve women with PD from cognitive decline.