Berit Hackenberg

Dr. Berit Hackenberg


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBerit Hackenberg
Berit Hackenberg
JDJulia Döge
Julia Döge
KOKaroline O’brien
Karoline O’brien
ABAndrea Bohnert
Andrea Bohnert
KLKarl Lackner
Karl Lackner
Katharina Bahr-HammKatharina Bahr-Hamm
Katharina Bahr-Hamm
Tinnitus is a common symptom reported in otolaryngologic practice. Although the pathophysiology of tinnitus has not been fully understood, clinical studies suggest that psychological symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization are increased in tinnitus patients. However, patients seeking medical treatment for tinnitus may be especially vulnerable. Population-based studies reporting on the association between tinnitus and psychological distress are still lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of tinnitus with depression, anxiety, or somatization in a large population-based cohort. The Gutenberg Health Study is a population-based cohort study. Participants were asked about the occurrence of tinnitus (yes/no) and how much they were bothered by it. In addition, they completed the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and SSS-8 questionnaires to assess depressive symptoms, anxiety, and somatic symptom disorders. A total of 8539 participants were included in the study cohort. Tinnitus prevalence was 28.0% (2387). The prevalence of depression/anxiety/somatic symptom disorders was significantly higher among participants with tinnitus than among participants without tinnitus (7.9%/5.4%/40.4% participants with tinnitus vs. 4.6%/3.3%/26.9% participants without tinnitus, p-value < 0.0001). Logistic regression results showed that participants with tinnitus were more likely to suffer from depression (OR = 2.033, 95% CI [1.584; 2.601], p-value < 0.0001), anxiety (OR = 1.841, 95% CI [1.228; 2.728], p-value = 0.0027), or somatic symptom disorders (OR = 2.057, 95% CI [1.799; 2.352], p-value < 0.0001). Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatic symptom disorders were increased in participants with tinnitus. This must be taken into account when treating these patients.

20 March 2023 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBerit Hackenberg
Berit Hackenberg
KOKaroline O’brien
Karoline O’brien
JDJulia Döge
Julia Döge
KLKarl Lackner
Karl Lackner
MBManfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel
Katharina Bahr-HammKatharina Bahr-Hamm
Katharina Bahr-Hamm
Background and Objectives: Tinnitus is a common symptom in medical practice, although data on its prevalence vary. As the underlying pathophysiological mechanism is still not fully understood, hearing loss is thought to be an important risk factor for the occurrence of tinnitus. The aim of this study was to assess tinnitus prevalence in a large German cohort and to determine its dependence on hearing impairment. Materials and Methods: The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based cohort study and representative for the population of Mainz and its district. Participants were asked whether they suffer from tinnitus and how much they are burdened by it. Extensive audiological examinations using bone- and air-conduction were also performed. Results: 4942 participants (mean age: 61.0, 2550 men and 2392 women) were included in the study. The overall prevalence of tinnitus was 26.1%. Men were affected significantly more often than women. The prevalence of tinnitus increased with age, peaking at ages 75 to 79 years. Considering only annoying tinnitus, the prevalence was 9.8%. Logistic regression showed that participants with severe to complete hearing loss (>65 dB) were more likely to have tinnitus. Conclusions: Tinnitus is a common symptom, and given demographic changes, its prevalence is expected to increase.

27 March 2019 in BMC Medical Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BEBenjamin Philipp Ernst
Benjamin Philipp Ernst
MHMohamed Hodeib
Mohamed Hodeib
SSSebastian Strieth
Sebastian Strieth
JKJulian Künzel
Julian Künzel
FBFabian Bischof
Fabian Bischof
SBSven Becker
Sven Becker
Reports of head and neck ultrasound examinations are frequently written by hand as free texts. Naturally, quality and structure of free text reports is variable, depending on the examiner’s individual level of experience. Aim of the present study was to compare the quality of free text reports (FTR) and structured reports (SR) of head and neck ultrasound examinations. Both standard FTRs and SRs of head and neck ultrasound examinations of 43 patients were acquired by nine independent examiners with comparable levels of experience. A template for structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound examinations was created using a web-based approach. FTRs and SRs were evaluated with regard to overall quality, completeness, required time to completion, and readability by four independent raters with different specializations (Paired Wilcoxon test, 95% CI) and inter-rater reliability was assessed (Fleiss’ kappa). A questionnaire was used to compare FTRs vs. SRs with respect to user satisfaction (Mann-Whitney U test, 95% CI). By comparison, completeness scores of SRs were significantly higher than FTRs’ completeness scores (94.4% vs. 45.6%, p < 0.001), and pathologies were described in more detail (91.1% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001). Readability was significantly higher in all SRs when compared to FTRs (100% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.001). The mean time to complete a report, however, was significantly higher in SRs (176.5 vs. 107.3 s, p < 0.001). SRs achieved significantly higher user satisfaction ratings (VAS 8.87 vs. 1.41, p < 0.001) and a very high inter-rater reliability (Fleiss’ kappa 0.92). As compared to FTRs, SRs of head and neck ultrasound examinations are more comprehensive and easier to understand. On the balance, the additional time needed for completing a SR is negligible. Also, SRs yield high inter-rater reliability and may be used for high-quality scientific data analyses.

23 October 2023 in Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BHBerit Hackenberg
Berit Hackenberg
KOKaroline O'BRien
Karoline O'BRien
JDJulia Döge
Julia Döge
KLKarl J. Lackner
Karl J. Lackner
MBManfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel
Katharina Bahr-HammKatharina Bahr-Hamm
Katharina Bahr-Hamm
Objectives: Vertigo describes symptoms of abnormal movement of the environment or the patient's own body. As such, it affects patients' quality of life, prevents them from following their daily activities, and increases healthcare utilization. The Global Burden of Disease Project aims to quantify morbidity and mortality worldwide. In 2013, a separate disability weight for vertigo was introduced. The aim of this study is to estimate the symptom burden of disease caused by vertigo.Methods: This study analyzes data from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). The GHS is a population‐based cohort study representative of the city of Mainz and its district. Participants were asked whether they suffered from vertigo and, if so, how bothered they felt by it, rating their distress on a six‐level scale from 1 = little stressful to 6 = extremely stressful.Results: Eight thousand five hundred and nineteen participants could be included in the study. The overall prevalence of vertigo was 21.6% (95%‐confidence interval [CI] [20.7%; 22.5%]). Vertigo prevalence peaked in the age group of 55–64 years. Vertigo annoyance averaged 2.42 (1.28). When an annoyance of 3–6 was considered bothersome, the prevalence of bothersome vertigo was 8.1 % (95%‐CI [7.5%; 8.7%]). Age‐standardized to the European Standard Population 2013, vertigo caused a burden of 2102 years lived with disability per 100,000 population.Conclusion: In this study, it was found that one in five people suffer at least occasionally from vertigo. This result suggests a significant burden of disease. This burden is reported at the symptom level. Future studies are needed to attribute the burden to specific causes.Level of Evidence: 2.

14 December 2021 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBerit Hackenberg
Berit Hackenberg
JDJulia Döge
Julia Döge
KLKarl J. Lackner
Karl J. Lackner
MBManfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel
TMThomas Münzel
Thomas Münzel
Katharina Bahr-HammKatharina Bahr-Hamm
Katharina Bahr-Hamm
Objectives/Hypothesis: Hearing loss is the most common sensory impairment worldwide. It restricts patients in many aspects of their daily lives and can lead to social exclusion. Understanding this burden is a mandatory requirement for the care of those affected. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the burden of hearing loss in a large German cohort.Study Design: Cohort study.Methods: The Gutenberg Health Study is designed as a single‐center, prospective, and observational cohort study and representative for the city of Mainz, Germany, with its district. Participants were interviewed concerning common otologic symptoms and tested by pure‐tone audiometry. The primary outcome was hearing impairment stratified by age and sex. The prevalence of tinnitus was estimated for a subcohort to calculate disability‐adjusted life years (DALYs). All results were weighted by the European Standard Population (ESP) 2013.Results: A total of 5,024 participants (mean age: 61.2 years, 2,591 men and 2,433 women) were included in the study. Hearing impairment showed the following prevalence: 28.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.9%–29.4%) mild impairment, 10.1% (95% CI, 9.3%–11.0%) moderate impairment, 2.3% (95% CI, 1.9%–2.7%) moderately severe impairment, 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%–0.4%) severe impairment, 0% (95% CI, 0.0%–0.1%) profound impairment, and 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0%–0.2%) complete impairment. Weighted for the ESP 2013 (all ages), hearing impairment across all levels (with/without tinnitus) causes a total of 2,118.97 DALYs per 100,000.Conclusion: With 40.9% affected, the hearing loss represents a relevant burden of the German population. Understanding this will provide the basis for future guidelines on how to care for these patients.Level of Evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 132:1843–1849, 2022

17 March 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristopher Seifen
Christopher Seifen
JPJohannes Pordzik
Johannes Pordzik
THTilman Huppertz
Tilman Huppertz
BHBerit Hackenberg
Berit Hackenberg
CSCornelia Schupp
Cornelia Schupp
HGHaralampos Gouveris
Haralampos Gouveris
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been associated with various acute and chronic inflammatory diseases, as has serum ferritin, an intracellular iron storage protein. Little is known about the relationship between severity of OSA and serum ferritin levels in otherwise healthy subjects. In this study, all polysomnographic recordings, serum levels of ferritin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and hemoglobin, as well as patient files from 90 consecutive, otherwise healthy individuals with suspected OSA who presented to a tertiary sleep medical center were retrospectively analyzed. For comparison, three groups were formed based on apnea–hypopnea index (AHI; none or mild OSA: 30/h). Serum ferritin levels were significantly positively correlated with AHI (r = 0.3240, p = 0.0020). A clear trend of higher serum ferritin levels was found when patients with severe OSA were compared to those without or with mild OSA. Serum CRP and serum hemoglobin levels did not differ significantly among OSA severity groups. Age and body–mass index (BMI) tended to be higher with increasing OSA severity. The BMI was significant higher in patients with severe OSA compared to those without or with mild (p < 0.001). Therefore, serum ferritin levels may provide a biochemical surrogate marker for OSA severity.