Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz

Mrs. Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 August 2023 in Infrastructures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CARLOS CHANGCARLOS CHANG
CARLOS CHANG
GSGianine Tejada Salinas
Gianine Tejada Salinas
TGTeresa Salinas Gamero
Teresa Salinas Gamero
SSSTELLA SCHROEDER
STELLA SCHROEDER
MCMario A. Vélez Canchanya
Mario A. Vélez Canchanya
SMSyeda Lamiya Mahnaz
Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz
Over the next decades, people will continue moving to urban areas all over the world, increasing infrastructure needs to satisfy economic, environmental, and social demands. The connection between civil urban infrastructure and smart cities is strong due to the common goal of fulfilling public service demands. Infrastructure management contributes to the development, evolution, and sustainability of smart cities. The main problem with traditional approaches to the development, evolution, and sustainability of smart cities is the lack of a holistic, integrated vision of infrastructure management. The main objective of this research is to introduce an infrastructure management humanistic approach with a smart city conceptual model that also considers an educational perspective. A mixed research methodology that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches was used, applying inductive-deductive tools. The paper concludes with the development of an infrastructure management framework for smart cities with five dimensions: (1) Environmental, (2) financial-economic, (3) political-governance, (4) social-people, and (5) technological. Two case studies for the cities of Lima and Piura in Perú illustrate how to incorporate this framework into practice. The research products are relevant because they foster an inclusive better quality of life for all citizens by preserving civil infrastructure systems.

7 July 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CARLOS CHANGCARLOS CHANG
CARLOS CHANG
MVMarketa Vavrova
Marketa Vavrova
SMSyeda Lamiya Mahnaz
Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz
Safety is a major worldwide concern due to the increasing number of fatalities of vulnerable road users (VRUs). VRUs are pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists, and their safety is a priority when making infrastructure management decisions. Traditionally, transportation agencies have adopted transportation asset management (TAM) practices based on performance measures to assess the physical condition of transport infrastructure. This paper describes a framework to incorporate VRU’s safety into the TAM decision-making process. The main objective of the VRU-TAM framework is to mitigate pedestrian fatalities by improving the decision-making process at the strategic and operational management level. The VRU-TAM framework is composed of four phases: assessment, prioritization, scenario analysis, and results. It includes a prioritization methodology using a safety-weighted effectiveness ratio (SWER) to consider pedestrian safety factors and costs in the decision-making process. In a broader perspective, pedestrian safety is affected by driver, demographic, pedestrian, infrastructure, and policy related factors. The decision-making criteria reflected in SWER considers the asset importance, location, pedestrian safety risk, costs, and remaining life in the budget allocation process, and adopts the dynamic bubble up (DBU) technique for budget prioritization at the network level. An example is presented for crosswalks to demonstrate the applicability of the methodology to evaluate different budget-driven scenarios for funding allocation. As a conclusion, it is demonstrated that the outcomes of the budget-driven scenarios following the method that incorporates safety criteria, with tangible metrics, offer a deeper understanding of the effects of budgetary constraints on backlog costs and the remaining life of infrastructure assets.

23 September 2022 in Businesses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CARLOS CHANGCARLOS CHANG
CARLOS CHANG
JMJohanes Makahaube
Johanes Makahaube
Adeeba RaheemAdeeba Raheem
Adeeba Raheem
ESEric Smith
Eric Smith
SMSyeda Lamiya Mahnaz
Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz
Measuring project management performance is complex and requires tools to capture the dynamic nature of the processes involved. Since the conception of system dynamics in the 1950s, the method has been used to solve complex projects. Project management possesses dynamic characteristics that involve planning, human resources, implementation, and control elements; thereby, using system dynamics to measure project management performance is a realistic approach. A research study was conducted using system dynamics to develop project management performance measures to capture the complexity of the process in local government agencies. The research approach considers measuring project engineering management performance as a holistic system influenced by leadership involvement, project management processes, and project engineering manager’s ability. The Zachman architectural framework was used to develop the project-management performance system’s ontology as the system dynamics model’s foundation. A case study was conducted for three cities with local government agencies to better understand the model components and factors that influence performance. Leadership involvement, project management processes, and project manager abilities were identified as critical factors that influence the project management performance level. To validate the results of the case study, the project management performance was further studied for the City of El Paso in terms of capability, capacity, and maturity level. The research study concluded that system dynamics is a feasible method and effective tool to measure management performance for engineering projects at local government agencies.

21 April 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CARLOS CHANGCARLOS CHANG
CARLOS CHANG
MVMarketa Vavrova
Marketa Vavrova
SMSyeda Lamiya Mahnaz
Syeda Lamiya Mahnaz
As more on-road bikeways are built, the timely application of maintenance treatments becomes critical to ensure safe and comfortable conditions for bicyclists. Longitudinal and transverse cracks that evolve to potholes, rough cut utility patching, raveling, and weathering are flexible pavement distresses that pose safety threats to bicyclists. Faulting and spalling are also safety hazards to bicyclists on rigid pavements. Despite of the need to adopt preventive maintenance policies to preserve on-street bikeways in good condition, bikeway maintenance practices are mostly reactive. The main contribution of this paper is to integrate bikeways maintenance criteria into a policy planning approach for pavement management practices. This planning approach articulates inventory data, condition assessment, maintenance treatment selection, budget needs, funding prioritization, and reports for the implementation of enhanced pavement management systems. Information Technology Systems (ITS) should also support data collection and analysis in the implementation of an integrated maintenance approach. With the adoption of ITS tools, traffic flow, space occupancy and congestion information can be registered in real-time for efficient management. As a result, transportation agencies, metropolitan planning organizations, and cities should make better-informed maintenance decisions for the benefit of all road users.