Pierre Reynard

Dr. Pierre Reynard

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 December 2021 in Audiology and Neurotology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PRPierre Reynard
Pierre Reynard
JLJosée Lagacé
Josée Lagacé
CJCharles-Alexandre Joly
Charles-Alexandre Joly
LDLéon Dodelé
Léon Dodelé
EVEvelyne Veuillet
Evelyne Veuillet
HTHung Thai-Van
Hung Thai-Van
Background: Difficulty understanding speech in background noise is the reason of consultation for most people who seek help for their hearing. With the increased use of speech-in-noise (SpIN) testing, audiologists and otologists are expected to evidence disabilities in a greater number of patients with sensorineural hearing loss. The purpose of this study is to list validated available SpIN tests for the French-speaking population. Summary: A review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Search strategies used a combination of 4 keywords: speech, audiometry, noise, and French. There were 10 validated SpIN tests dedicated to the Francophone adult population at the time of the review. Some tests use digits triplets as speech stimuli and were originally designed for hearing screening. The others were given a broader range of indications covering diagnostic or research purposes, determination of functional capacities and fitness for duty, as well as assessment of hearing amplification benefit. Key Messages: As there is a SpIN test for almost any type of clinical or rehabilitation needs, both the accuracy and duration should be considered for choosing one or the other. In an effort to meet the needs of a rapidly aging population, fast adaptive procedures can be favored to screen large groups in order to limit the risk of ignoring the early signs of forthcoming presbycusis and to provide appropriate audiological counseling.

1 March 2020 in International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EIEugen Constant Ionescu
Eugen Constant Ionescu
PRPierre Reynard
Pierre Reynard
NGNathalie Goulème
Nathalie Goulème
CBCécile Becaud
Cécile Becaud
Karen SPRUYTKaren SPRUYT
Karen SPRUYT
HTHung Thai-Van
Hung Thai-Van

26 September 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SISamar Amer IDRISS
Samar Amer IDRISS
PRPierre Reynard
Pierre Reynard
MMMathieu Marx
Mathieu Marx
AMAlbane MAINGUY
Albane MAINGUY
CJCharles-Alexandre Joly
Charles-Alexandre Joly
HTHung Thai-Van
Hung Thai-Van
Patients with single-sided deafness can experience an ipsilateral disabling tinnitus that has a major impact on individuals’ social communication and quality of life. Cochlear implants appear to be superior to conventional treatments to alleviate tinnitus in single-sided deafness. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of cochlear implants in single-sided deafness with disabling tinnitus when conventional treatments fail to alleviate tinnitus (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022353292). All published studies in PubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases until December 2021 were included. A total of 474 records were retrieved, 31 studies were included and were divided into two categories according to whether tinnitus was assessed as a primary complaint or not. In all studies, cochlear implantation, evaluated using subjective validated tools, succeeded in reducing tinnitus significantly. Objective evaluation tools were less likely to be used but showed similar results. A short-(3 months) and long-(up to 72 months) term tinnitus suppression was reported. When the cochlear implant is disactivated, complete residual tinnitus inhibition was reported to persist up to 24 h. The results followed a similar pattern in studies where tinnitus was assesed as a primary complaint or not. In conclusion, the present review confirmed the effectiveness of cochlear implantation in sustainably reducing disabling tinnitus in single-sided deafness patients.

25 March 2022 in International Journal of Audiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HTHung Thai-Van
Hung Thai-Van
CJCharles-Alexandre Joly
Charles-Alexandre Joly
SISamar Idriss
Samar Idriss
JMJean-Baptiste Melki
Jean-Baptiste Melki
MDMatthieu Desmettre
Matthieu Desmettre
PRPierre Reynard
Pierre Reynard
The primary objective of the current study was the validation of a cloud-centralized audiometry system for clinical practice.A cross-sectional study design was used.A convenience sample of patients...

13 December 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CJCharles-Alexandre Joly
Charles-Alexandre Joly
PRPierre Reynard
Pierre Reynard
RHRuben Hermann
Ruben Hermann
FSFabien Seldran
Fabien Seldran
SGStephane Gallego
Stephane Gallego
HTHung Thai-Van
Hung Thai-Van
Broader intra-cochlear current spread (ICCS) implies higher cochlear implant (CI) channel interactions. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ICCS and speech intelligibility in experienced CI users. Using voltage matrices collected for impedance measurements, an individual exponential spread coefficient (ESC) was computed. Speech audiometry was performed to determine the intelligibility at 40 dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL) and the 50% speech reception threshold: I40 and SRT50 respectively. Correlations between ESC and either I40 or SRT50 were assessed. A total of 36 adults (mean age: 50 years) with more than 11 months (mean: 34 months) of CI experience were included. In the 21 subjects for whom all electrodes were active, ESC was moderately correlated with both I40 (r = −0.557, p = 0.009) and SRT50 (r = 0.569, p = 0.007). The results indicate that speech perception performance is negatively affected by the ICCS. Estimates of current spread at the closest vicinity of CI electrodes and prior to any activation of auditory neurons are indispensable to better characterize the relationship between CI stimulation and auditory perception in cochlear implantees.

20 August 2018 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EIEugen Constant Ionescu
Eugen Constant Ionescu
ACAurelie Coudert
Aurelie Coudert
PRPierre Reynard
Pierre Reynard
ETEric Truy
Eric Truy
HTHung Thai-Van
Hung Thai-Van
FTFrancis Turjman
Francis Turjman
Patients presenting superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) can experience symptoms such as conductive hearing loss, pulsatile tinnitus, autophony, and pressure-induced vertigo. Decreased cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) thresholds and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the petrous bone are essential for diagnosis of SSCD syndrome. We report the case of a 43-year-old man suffering from constant right pulsatile tinnitus, intermittent autophony, and unsteadiness induced by physical exercise. An SSCD by the superior petrosal sinus (SPS) was confirmed on the right side by axial HRCT of the temporal bone reformatted in the plane of Pöschl and ipsilateral abnormally low elicited cVEMPs. Treatment options were discussed with the patient since the pulsatile tinnitus progressively became debilitating. Two options were considered: surgery or a new endovascular treatment; the patient chose the latter option. After stenting the right SPS, the intensity of the pulsatile tinnitus dramatically decreased. As there was no complication the patient was discharged at Day 1. The other symptoms improved progressively. By the 60-day follow-up visit the patient only reported a slight tinnitus worsened by physical exercise. Angiographic follow-up at 5 months confirmed the patency of the SPS. Stenting the SPS in patients with SSCD by the SPS appears to be an alternative to the existing surgical treatments.