Gemma Pearson

Dr. Gemma Pearson

The Horse Trust & Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2018 in Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHCarol Hall
Carol Hall
HRHayley Randle
Hayley Randle
GPGemma Pearson
Gemma Pearson
LPLiane Preshaw
Liane Preshaw
NWNatalie K. Waran
Natalie K. Waran

1 May 2017 in Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ODOrla Doherty
Orla Doherty
PMPaul McGreevy
Paul McGreevy
GPGemma Pearson
Gemma Pearson

19 February 2023 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IWInga A. Wolframm
Inga A. Wolframm
JDJanet Douglas
Janet Douglas
GPGemma Pearson
Gemma Pearson
Equestrianism is currently facing a range of pressing challenges. These challenges, which are largely based on evolving attitudes to ethics and equine wellbeing, have consequences for the sport’s social licence to operate. The factors that may have contributed to the current situation include overarching societal trends, specific aspects of the equestrian sector, and factors rooted in human nature. If equestrianism is to flourish, it is evident that much needs to change, not the least, human behaviour. To this end, using established behaviour change frameworks that have been scientifically validated and are rooted in practice—most notably, Michie et al.’s COM-B model and Behaviour Change Wheel—could be of practical value for developing and implementing equine welfare strategies. This review summarises the theoretical underpinnings of some behaviour change frameworks and provides a practical, step-by-step approach to designing an effective behaviour change intervention. A real-world example is provided through the retrospective analysis of an intervention strategy that aimed to increase the use of learning theory in (educational) veterinary practice. We contend that the incorporation of effective behaviour change interventions into any equine welfare improvement strategy may help to safeguard the future of equestrianism.

29 July 2020 in Equine Veterinary Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGemma Pearson
Gemma Pearson
RRR. Reardon
R. Reardon
JKJ. Keen
J. Keen
NWNatalie K. Waran
Natalie K. Waran
Summary: Despite the considerable risk of veterinary occupational injury due to adverse horse behaviour, limited information is available about the prevalence of unwanted equine behaviours or common approaches to managing them. An understanding of learning theory may affect veterinarians’ approaches to dealing with unwanted equine behaviours; however, learning theory is not widely taught. The aim of this study was to document the challenges equine veterinarians face when working with difficult horses and define their approaches to managing them, including their understanding of the processes through which horses learn. A link to an online survey was distributed via email amongst UK equine veterinarians. Descriptive and Kruskal–Wallis statistical analyses were performed. We found that 95% of equine veterinarians reported working with difficult horses on at least a monthly basis, resulting in 81% of them sustaining at least one injury in the last 5 years. The most popular methods of dealing with unwanted behaviours were physical and chemical restraint. 46% of those surveyed had never received any tuition on the processes through which horses learn. Despite 79% believing they had at least a moderate understanding of equine learning theory, they performed poorly when tested, with only 10% able to get at least five out of six questions correct. Further education on the subject of learning theory may be beneficial.

8 October 2023 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGemma Pearson
Gemma Pearson
JDJanet Douglas
Janet Douglas
IWInga A. Wolframm
Inga A. Wolframm
TFTamzin Furtado
Tamzin Furtado
The 2023 Grand National steeplechase race was delayed when protesters from the animal rights group, ‘Animal Rising’, gained access to the course just prior to the race. The international media spotlight was focused on what is already a high-profile event and the social licence of both this race and racing in general was scrutinised. Both at the time and for several days afterwards, the general public was exposed to two different narratives from pro- and anti-racing communities. This paper discusses these perspectives and the potential impact on the general public’s relationship with racing. Whilst well-meaning and aiming to promote racing, much of the racing industry’s commentary inadvertently risked damaging its reputation due to a poor understanding of social licence principles. We explore the reasons for these two groups’ alternative perspectives on welfare and suggest considerations for change. Ultimately, if ‘the people’s race’ is to maintain its social licence, the racing community needs to both understand and embrace the concept. Welcoming independent opinions, engaging with different viewpoints, accepting that change is inevitable and, most importantly, being proactive in making changes to prioritise equine welfare will all help racing to move towards greater public acceptance.

5 September 2019 in In Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GPGemma Pearson
Gemma Pearson
Background: It is common for veterinary practitioners to experience difficult behaviour from horses when treating them.Aim of the article: This article provides a guide to equine handling skills, which can be used within clinical practice to ensure the horse, client and vet are all managed safely.