Vladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov

Prof. Vladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov

Federal Research Centre “Krasnoyarsk Science Centre” of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science, Scientific Research Institute of medical problems of the North, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarskiy Kray, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 September 2013 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Alexander TyakhtAlexander Tyakht
Alexander Tyakht
EKElena Kostryukova
Elena Kostryukova
APAnna S Popenko
Anna S Popenko
MBMaxim S Belenikin
Maxim S Belenikin
APAlexander V Pavlenko
Alexander V Pavlenko
VGVadim M Govorun
Vadim M Govorun
The microbial community of the human gut has a crucial role in sustaining host homeostasis. High-throughput DNA sequencing has delineated the structural and functional configurations of gut metagenomes in world populations. The microbiota of the Russian population is of particular interest to researchers, because Russia encompasses a uniquely wide range of environmental conditions and ethnogeographical cohorts. Here we conduct a shotgun metagenomic analysis of gut microbiota samples from 96 healthy Russian adult subjects, which reveals novel microbial community structures. The communities from several rural regions display similarities within each region and are dominated by the bacterial taxa associated with the healthy gut. Functional analysis shows that the metabolic pathways exhibiting differential abundance in the novel types are primarily associated with the trade-off between the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla. The specific signatures of the Russian gut microbiota are likely linked to the host diet, cultural habits and socioeconomic status.

29 February 2016 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMassimo Rugge
Massimo Rugge
RGRobert M Genta
Robert M Genta
DGDavid Y Graham
David Y Graham
FMFrancesco Di Mario
Francesco Di Mario
LCLuiz G Gonzaga Vaz Coelho
Luiz G Gonzaga Vaz Coelho
PCPelayo Correa
Pelayo Correa
In 1980, an international group of pathologists and clinicians led by Basil Morson published a critical review entitled Precancerous Conditions and Epithelial Dysplasia in the Stomach.1 This seminal article attempted to merge Eastern and Western pathological experiences in the evaluation of preneoplastic conditions into a systematic approach to the evaluation of gastric precancerous conditions. Thirty-five years after its publication, we pay homage to Professor Morson's team by revisiting their positions in light of the dramatic advances of our understanding of gastric disease that have occurred during this time. To this end, we have selected from the original article those statements that warranted reappraisal and, after reproducing them verbatim, have provided our comments.Introduction When considering problems of pre-malignancy, it is essential to define exactly what is meant by this term. A distinction can be made between a precancerous condition and a precancerous lesion. The former is best regarded as a clinical state associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer, whereas a precancerous lesion is a histopathological abnormality in which cancer is more likely to occur than in its apparently normal counterpart. In many clinical conditions with an increased risk of cancer, there is also an identifiable precancerous lesion, but this is not invariably so.

20 December 2021 in Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VIVladimir Ivashkin
Vladimir Ivashkin
IMIgor V. Maev
Igor V. Maev
TLT. L. Lapina
T. L. Lapina
EFE. D. Fedorov
E. D. Fedorov
ASA. A. Sheptulin
A. A. Sheptulin
Vladislav Vladimirovich TsukanovVladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
Vladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
Aim.The clinical guidelines are intended to supplement specialty decision-making for improved aid quality in patients with gastritis and duodenitis though acknowledging the latest clinical evidence and principles of evidencebased medicine.Key points.Gastritis is an inflammatory disease of stomach mucosa, with a separate definition of acute and chronic gastritis. Chronic gastritis is a cohort of chronic diseases uniting a typical morphology of persistent inflammatory infiltration, impaired cellular renewal with emergent intestinal metaplasia, atrophy and epithelial dysplasia of gastric mucosa. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGDS) or high-resolution OGDS with magnified or non-magnified virtual chromoendoscopy, including targeted biopsy for atrophy and intestinal metaplasia grading and neoplasia detection, are recommended to verify gastritis and duodenitis, precancer states and/or gastric mucosal changes. All chronic gastritis patients positive for H. рylori should undergo eradication therapy as aetiological and subsidiary for gastric cancer prevention. Chronic gastritis patients with symptoms of dyspepsia (epigastric pain, burning and congestion, early satiety), also combined with functional dyspepsia, are recommended proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, rebamipide and bismuth tripotassium dicitrate in symptomatic treatment. With focal restricted intestinal metaplasia, follow-up is not required in most cases, mainly when advanced atrophic gastritis is ruled out in high-quality endoscopy with biopsy. However, a familial history of gastric cancer, incomplete intestinal metaplasia and persistent H. pylori infection render endoscopy monitoring with chromoendoscopy and targeted biopsy desirable once in three years. Patients with advanced atrophic gastritis should have high-quality endoscopy every 3 years, and once in 1–2 years if complicated with a familial history of gastric cancer.Conclusion.The recommendations condense current knowledge on the aetiology and pathogenesis of gastritis and duodenitis, as well as laboratory and instrumental diagnostic techniques, main approaches to aetiological H. pylori eradication and treatment of dyspeptic states.

2 January 2022 in Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VIVladimir Ivashkin
Vladimir Ivashkin
IMI. V. Maev
I. V. Maev
YSYu. A. Shelygin
Yu. A. Shelygin
EBE. K. Baranskaya
E. K. Baranskaya
SBS. S. Belous
S. S. Belous
Vladislav Vladimirovich TsukanovVladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
Vladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
Aim. Current clinical recommendations accentuate current methods for the diagnosis and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).Key points.IBS is a functional bowel disorder manifested with recurrent, at least weekly, abdominal pain with the following attributes (any two leastwise): link to defecation, its frequency or stool shape. The symptoms are expected to persist for at minimum three months in a total six-month follow-up. Similar to other functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, IBS can be diagnosed basing on the patient symptoms compliance with Rome IV criteria, provided the absence of potentially symptom-causative organic GI diseases. Due to challenging differential diagnosis, IBS can be appropriately established per exclusionem, with pre-examination as follows: general and biochemical blood tests; tissue transglutaminase IgA/IgG antibody tests; thyroid hormones test; faecal occult blood test; hydrogen glucose/ lactulose breath test for bacterial overgrowth; stool test for enteric bacterial pathogens and Clostridium difficile A/B toxins; stool calprotectin test; abdominal ultrasound; OGDS, with biopsy as appropriate; colonoscopy with biopsy. The IBS sequence is typically wavelike, with alternating remissions and exacerbations often triggered by psychoemotional stress. Treatment of IBS patients includes dietary and lifestyle adjustments, various-class drug agents prescription and psychotherapeutic measures.Conclusion. Adherence to clinical recommendations can facilitate timely diagnosis and improve medical aid quality in patients with different clinical IBS variants.

30 December 2022 in Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VIVladimir Ivashkin
Vladimir Ivashkin
TLT. L. Lapina
T. L. Lapina
IMIgor V. Maev
Igor V. Maev
ODO. M. Drapkina
O. M. Drapkina
Roman KozlovRoman Kozlov
Roman Kozlov
Vladislav Vladimirovich TsukanovVladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
Vladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
Aim: bring to the attention of practitioners indications for anti-Helicobacter therapy, methods and procedure for diagnostics and eradication therapy ofН. pyloriinfection.Key points. Chronic gastritis caused byН. pyloriinfection, including asymptomatic persons, may be considered as an indication for eradication therapy of Н. pylori as etiological therapy and opportunistic screening for gastric cancer prevention. Indications, for obligatory anti-Helicobacter therapy include peptic ulcer, gastric MALT lymphoma, early gastric cancer (EGC) with endoscopic resection. H. pylori primary diagnostics methods include13C-urea breath test,H. pyloristool antigen lab test, rapid urease test and serological method. The serological method cannot be used after anti-Helicobacter therapy.In RussiaH. pyloristrains' resistance to clarithromycin does not exceed 15 % in most regional studies. The first line therapy forН. pyloriinfection eradication is the standard triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin and amoxicillin, enhanced with bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate. A classic four-component therapy based on bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate or quadrotherapy without bismuth drug products which includes PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole, may be used as alternative to the first line eradication therapy. The standard triple therapy may be prescribed for 14 days only in those regions, where it has been proven to be effective. Quadrotherapy with bismuthate tripotassium dicitrate is also used as main second line therapy in case of standard triple therapy, bismuth enhanced standard triple therapy or combined therapy failure. Another second line therapy includes PPI, levofloxacin and amoxicillin, to which a bismuth-containing drug product may be added. The third line therapy is selected individually based on previously used treatment settings.Conclusion. In each case ofH. pyloriinfection the decision for eradication therapy should be made, which is especially relevant as eradication ofH. pylorihas been recognized as an effective measure for the prevention of gastric cancer.

22 June 2015 in Epidemiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMB. J. McMAHON
B. J. McMAHON
MBM. G. Bruce
M. G. Bruce
AKAnders Koch
Anders Koch
KGK. J. Goodman
K. J. Goodman
Vladislav Vladimirovich TsukanovVladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
Vladislav Vladimirovich Tsukanov
APA. J. Parkinson
A. J. Parkinson
SUMMARY: Helicobacter pyloriinfection is a major cause of peptic ulcer and is also associated with chronic gastritis, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, and adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Guidelines have been developed in the United States and Europe (areas with low prevalence) for the diagnosis and management of this infection, including the recommendation to ‘test and treat’ those with dyspepsia. A group of international experts performed a targeted literature review and formulated an expert opinion for evidenced-based benefits and harms for screening and treatment ofH. pyloriin high-prevalence countries. They concluded that in Arctic countries whereH. pyloriprevalence exceeds 60%, treatment of persons withH. pyloriinfection should be limited only to instances where there is strong evidence of direct benefit in reduction of morbidity and mortality, associated peptic ulcer disease and MALT lymphoma and that the test-and-treat strategy may not be beneficial for those with dyspepsia.