Jiafu Liu

Dr. Jiafu Liu

School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2022 in ISA Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LZLiang Zhang
Liang Zhang
Jiafu LiuJiafu Liu
Jiafu Liu
NCNaigang Cui
Naigang Cui

30 August 2017 in Nonlinear Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jiafu LiuJiafu Liu
Jiafu Liu
LCLiqun Chen
Liqun Chen
NCNaigang Cui
Naigang Cui

17 July 2023 in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jiafu LiuJiafu Liu
Jiafu Liu
YLYanzheng Lin
Yanzheng Lin
YHYuting Huang
Yuting Huang
LLLuyang Liu
Luyang Liu
XCXueming Cai
Xueming Cai
Benshui ShuBenshui Shu
Benshui Shu

1 March 2019 in Acta Astronautica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jiafu LiuJiafu Liu
Jiafu Liu
CMColin R. McInnes
Colin R. McInnes

1 October 2019 in Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XLXiaobin Lian
Xiaobin Lian
Jiafu LiuJiafu Liu
Jiafu Liu
JZJinxiu Zhang
Jinxiu Zhang
CWChuang Wang
Chuang Wang

1 January 2014 in Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jiafu LiuJiafu Liu
Jiafu Liu
SRSiyuan Rong
Siyuan Rong
FSFan Shen
Fan Shen
NCNaigang Cui
Naigang Cui
Solar sail can merely make use of solar radiation pressure (SRP) force as the thrust for space missions. The attitude dynamics is obtained for the highly flexible solar sail with control vanes, sliding masses, and a gimbaled control boom. The vibration equations are derived considering the geometric nonlinearity of the sail structure subjected to the forces generated by the control vanes, solar radiation pressure (SRP), and sliding masses. Then the dynamic models for attitude/vibration controller design and dynamic simulation are obtained, respectively. The linear quadratic regulator (LQR) based and optimal proportional‐integral (PI) based controllers are designed for the coupled attitude/vibration models with constant disturbance torques caused by the center‐of‐mass (cm)/center‐of‐pressure (cp) offset, respectively. It can be concluded from the theoretical analysis and simulation results that the optimal PI based controller performs better than the LQR based controller from the view of eliminating the steady‐state errors. The responses with and without the geometrical nonlinearity are performed, and the differences are observed and analyzed. And some suggestions are also presented.