Andrés Vivas

Dr. Andrés Vivas

Electronic Engineering Faculty, University of Cauca, Popayan, Colombia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2005 in Control Engineering Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrés Vivas Andrés Vivas
Andrés Vivas
PPPhilippe Poignet
Philippe Poignet

1 September 2006 in Control Engineering Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PRPierre Renaud
Pierre Renaud
Andrés Vivas Andrés Vivas
Andrés Vivas
NANicolas Andreff
Nicolas Andreff
PPPhilippe Poignet
Philippe Poignet
Philippe MartinetPhilippe Martinet
Philippe Martinet
OCOlivier Company
Olivier Company

1 September 2014
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
HVHermes Fabian Vargas
Hermes Fabian Vargas
Andrés Vivas Andrés Vivas
Andrés Vivas
This paper presents a newfangled gesture recognition system for handling two surgical robots in a virtual simulator. The two robots are designed to perform laparoscopy, in order to provide a basis for a surgical trainer. Originally the system is commanded by a joystick, but the inclusion of the new Leap Motion device allows the simulator to be handled by the gestures of the user's hands, which makes it more natural in its management. This device uses infrared signal processing to determine the position and orientation of the objects that are above him and promises to improve the user experience and the usability of 3d applications using natural interfaces instead of mechanical devices.

9 December 2003
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PPPh. Poignet
Ph. Poignet
NRN. Ramdani
N. Ramdani
Andrés Vivas Andrés Vivas
Andrés Vivas
International audienceThis paper deals with the application of interval analysis for outer bounding the physical parameters of parallel robots. The robot is modeled with classical Lagrange equation which leads to an inverse dynamic model linear with respect to the parameters. Assuming the error additive on input (motor torque), the problem is termed as a constraint propagation one and the solution is performed with a preconditionned Gauss-Seidel contractor modified in order to be used with over-determined linear systems. Experimental results are exhibited for a fully parallel robot with 4 degrees of freedom

19 June 2025 in International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTHernan Dario Trullo
Hernan Dario Trullo
Andrés Vivas Andrés Vivas
Andrés Vivas
Inverse kinematics is essential for precision tasks in fixed-base serial robots, such as surgical robotics or high-speed manufacturing, where delays or errors can have critical consequences. Current inverse kinematic methods face a fundamental trade-off: analytical solutions are fast but limited to spherical-wrist manipulators, while numerical and AI-based approaches sacrifice speed for generality. Despite prior reviews comparing performance metrics, no study provides a unified quantitative framework to guide method selection based on robot structure or application requirements. This systematic review addresses this lack of (1) quantitatively contrasting (response time, accuracy) analytical, numerical, and AI-based methods using studies in fields such as industrial robotics, medicine, and collaborative spaces and (2) identifying optimal hybrid strategies for real-time applications such as path planning. Using PRISMA, we analyzed 47 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus/Web of Science between 2019-2024, excluding algorithms for continuous, parallel, or mobile robots to focus solely on fixed-base serial architectures; selecting topics like ’inverse kinematics and serial robots and analytical or numeric or machine learning methods’. The review reveals that 32% of the analyzed methods are numerical, while 30% are AI-based approaches, reflecting the growing interest in data-driven solutions for IK problems; this scenario highlights the implementation of these methods given the limitations of analytical methods. Moreover, 56% of the nonanalytical approaches achieve an accuracy better than 0.01 mm; and about 70% of these approaches have response times exceeding 20 ms or don´t evaluate the metric, highlighting a critical bottleneck for real-time use. We conclude that hybrid IK methods, combined with standardized validation protocols, are essential for critical applications like robotic surgery. Future work must address benchmarking gaps, especially in AI-based IK, to enable reliable adoption in industry.

1 September 2003 in IFAC Proceedings Volumes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrés Vivas Andrés Vivas
Andrés Vivas
PPPhilippe Poignet
Philippe Poignet