Daniil I. Korobushkin

Dr. Daniil I. Korobushkin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 July 2022 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MVMari‐Liis Viljur
Mari‐Liis Viljur
SAScott R. Abella
Scott R. Abella
MAMartin Adámek
Martin Adámek
JAJanderson Batista Rodrigues Alencar
Janderson Batista Rodrigues Alencar
NBNicholas A. Barber
Nicholas A. Barber
STSimon Thorn
Simon Thorn
Disturbances alter biodiversity via their specific characteristics, including severity and extent in the landscape, which act at different temporal and spatial scales. Biodiversity response to disturbance also depends on the community characteristics and habitat requirements of species. Untangling the mechanistic interplay of these factors has guided disturbance ecology for decades, generating mixed scientific evidence of biodiversity responses to disturbance. Understanding the impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity is increasingly important due to human‐induced changes in natural disturbance regimes. In many areas, major natural forest disturbances, such as wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks, are becoming more frequent, intense, severe, and widespread due to climate change and land‐use change. Conversely, the suppression of natural disturbances threatens disturbance‐dependent biota. Using a meta‐analytic approach, we analysed a global data set (with most sampling concentrated in temperate and boreal secondary forests) of species assemblages of 26 taxonomic groups, including plants, animals, and fungi collected from forests affected by wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks. The overall effect of natural disturbances on α‐diversity did not differ significantly from zero, but some taxonomic groups responded positively to disturbance, while others tended to respond negatively. Disturbance was beneficial for taxonomic groups preferring conditions associated with open canopies (e.g. hymenopterans and hoverflies), whereas ground‐dwelling groups and/or groups typically associated with shady conditions (e.g. epigeic lichens and mycorrhizal fungi) were more likely to be negatively impacted by disturbance. Across all taxonomic groups, the highest α‐diversity in disturbed forest patches occurred under moderate disturbance severity, i.e. with approximately 55% of trees killed by disturbance. We further extended our meta‐analysis by applying a unified diversity concept based on Hill numbers to estimate α‐diversity changes in different taxonomic groups across a gradient of disturbance severity measured at the stand scale and incorporating other disturbance features. We found that disturbance severity negatively affected diversity for Hill number q = 0 but not for q = 1 and q = 2, indicating that diversity–disturbance relationships are shaped by species relative abundances. Our synthesis of α‐diversity was extended by a synthesis of disturbance‐induced change in species assemblages, and revealed that disturbance changes the β‐diversity of multiple taxonomic groups, including some groups that were not affected at the α‐diversity level (birds and woody plants). Finally, we used mixed rarefaction/extrapolation to estimate biodiversity change as a function of the proportion of forests that were disturbed, i.e. the disturbance extent measured at the landscape scale. The comparison of intact and naturally disturbed forests revealed that both types of forests provide habitat for unique species assemblages, whereas species diversity in the mixture of disturbed and undisturbed forests peaked at intermediate values of disturbance extent in the simulated landscape. Hence, the relationship between α‐diversity and disturbance severity in disturbed forest stands was strikingly similar to the relationship between species richness and disturbance extent in a landscape consisting of both disturbed and undisturbed forest habitats. This result suggests that both moderate disturbance severity and moderate disturbance extent support the highest levels of biodiversity in contemporary forest landscapes.

1 June 2017 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKonstantin O. Butenko
Konstantin O. Butenko
KGKonstantin B. Gongalsky
Konstantin B. Gongalsky
DKDaniil I. Korobushkin
Daniil I. Korobushkin
KEKlemens Ekschmitt
Klemens Ekschmitt
AZAndrey S. Zaitsev
Andrey S. Zaitsev

11 December 2020 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKonstantin B. Gongalsky
Konstantin B. Gongalsky
AZAndrey S. Zaytsev
Andrey S. Zaytsev
DKDaniil I. Korobushkin
Daniil I. Korobushkin
RSRuslan A. Saifutdinov
Ruslan A. Saifutdinov
KBKonstantin Butenko
Konstantin Butenko
RBRichard D Bardgett
Richard D Bardgett

19 May 2016 in Biodiversity Data Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDaniil I. Korobushkin
Daniil I. Korobushkin
ISIrina Semenyuk
Irina Semenyuk
Ivan Hadrián TufIvan Hadrián Tuf
Ivan Hadrián Tuf
The Abrau Peninsula is located in northwestern Caucasus between the cities of Novorossiysk and Anapa, Krasnodar Province, Russia. This paper contains an annotated checklist of the Chilopoda and Diplopoda inhabiting the Abrau Peninsula. The fauna of the Abrau Peninsula comprises 17 centipede (4 orders) and 16 millipede (6 orders) species. Henia taurica, hitherto known only from the Crimea, has now been reported from several localities in the studied region. The study also reveals two possibly new millipede species. Statistical analyses showed that habitat preferences of myriapod species within the Abrau Peninsula are caused by species geographic distribution pattern and microbiotope preferences.

24 May 2014 in Russian Journal of Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DKDaniil I. Korobushkin
Daniil I. Korobushkin
Isotopic analysis has become an important tool in the study of lateral links between ecosystems. The isotopic composition of carbon in terrestrial and aquatic primary producers can differ significantly, which provides an opportunity to identify the “marine” or “freshwater” carbon in the tissues of terrestrial animals. We measured the isotopic composition of C and N in tissues of soil invertebrates and estimated the proportion of “aquatic” carbon in the energy budget of terrestrial food webs at different distances from the Black Sea and a freshwater lake. Terrestrial predators are actively subsidized with carbon from the Black Sea to distance of up to about 50 m. The carbon subsidy from the freshwater lake is significant in the zone extending no farther than the forest border (ca. 15 m). Thus, the effect of allochthonous organic matter on terrestrial communities in both cases manifests itself only in a relatively narrow coastal strip.

1 April 2019 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KJKatharina John
Katharina John
MDMaxim Degtyarev
Maxim Degtyarev
AGAnastasia Gorbunova
Anastasia Gorbunova
DKDaniil I. Korobushkin
Daniil I. Korobushkin
HKHannah Knöss
Hannah Knöss
AZAndrey S. Zaytsev
Andrey S. Zaytsev