Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a deadly vascular disease, characterized by increased pulmonary arterial pressures and right heart failure. Considering prior non‐US studies of atrial arrhythmias in PAH, this retrospective, regional multi‐center US study sought to define more completely the risk factors and impact of paroxysmal and non‐paroxysmal forms of atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF/AFL) on mortality in this disease. We identified patients seen between 2010 and 2014 at UPMC (Pittsburgh) hospitals with hemodynamic and clinical criteria for PAH or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and determined those meeting electrocardiographic criteria for AF/AFL. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with time‐varying covariates to analyze the association between AF/AFL occurrence and survival with adjustments for potential cofounders and hemodynamic severity. Of 297 patients with PAH/CTEPH, 79 (26.5%) suffered from AF/AFL at some point. AF/AFL was first identified after PAH diagnosis in 42 (53.2%), identified prior to PAH diagnosis in 27 (34.2%), and had unclear timing in the remainder. AF/AFL patients were older, more often male, had lower left ventricular ejection fractions, and greater left atrial volume indices and right atrial areas than patients without AF/AFL. AF/AFL (whether diagnosed before or after PAH) was associated with a 3.81‐fold increase in the hazard of death (95% CI 2.64–5.52, p < 0.001). This finding was consistent with multivariable adjustment of hemodynamic, cardiac structural, and heart rate indices as well as in sensitivity analyses of patients with paroxysmal versus non‐paroxysmal arrhythmias. In these PAH/CTEPH patients, presence of AF/AFL significantly increased mortality risk. Mortality remained elevated in the absence of a high burden of uncontrolled or persistent arrhythmias, thus suggesting additional etiologies beyond rapid heart rate as an explanation. Future studies are warranted to confirm this observation and interrogate whether other therapies beyond rate and rhythm control are necessary to mitigate this risk.

Before the 33rd Annual International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation conference, there was significant intercenter variability in definitions of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of consensus-defined PGD warrant further investigation. We retrospectively examined 448 adult cardiac transplant recipients at our institution from 2005 to 2017. Patient and procedural characteristics were compared between PGD cases and controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model PGD and immediate postoperative high-inotrope requirement for hypothesized risk factors. Patients were followed for a mean 5.3 years to determine longitudinal mortality. The incidence of PGD was 16.5%. No significant differences were found with respect to age, sex, race, body mass index, predicted heart mass mismatch, pretransplant amiodarone therapy, or pretransplant mechanical circulatory support (MCS) between recipients with PGD versus no PGD. Each 10 minute increase in ischemic time was associated with 5% greater odds of PGD (OR = 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00–1.10]; p = 0.049). Pretransplant MCS, predicted heart mass mismatch ≥30%, and pretransplant amiodarone therapy were associated with high-immediate postoperative inotropic requirement. The 30 day, 1 year, and 5 year mortality for patients with PGD were 28.4%, 38.0%, and 45.8%, respectively, compared with 1.9%, 7.1%, and 21.5% for those without PGD (log-rank, p < 0.0001). PGD heralded high 30 day, 1 year, and 5 year mortality. Pretransplant MCS, predicted heart mass mismatch, and amiodarone exposure were associated with high-inotrope requirement, while prolonged ischemic time and multiple perioperative transfusions were associated with consensus-defined PGD, which may have important clinical implications under the revised United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to afflict millions of people worldwide. Patients with end-stage heart failure and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may be at risk for severe COVID-19 given a high prevalence of complex comorbidities and functional impaired immunity. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with end-stage heart failure and durable LVADs. Methods: The Trans-CoV-VAD registry is a multi-center registry of LVAD and cardiac transplant patients in the United States with confirmed COVID-19. Patient characteristics, exposure history, presentation, laboratory data, course, and clinical outcomes were collected by participating institutions and reviewed by a central data repository. This report represents the participation of the first 9 centers to report LVAD data into the registry. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in this cohort. The median age was 56 years (interquartile range, 46–68), 14 (35%) were women, and 21 (52%) were Black. Among the most common presenting symptoms were cough (41%), fever, and fatigue (both 38%). A total of 18% were asymptomatic at diagnosis. Only 43% of the patients reported either subjective or measured fever during the entire course of illness. Over half (60%) required hospitalization, and 8 patients (20%) died, often after lengthy hospitalizations. Conclusions: We present the largest case series of LVAD patients with COVID-19 to date. Understanding these characteristics is essential in an effort to improve the outcome of this complex patient population.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a relatively new class of antihyperglycemic drug with salutary effects on glucose control, body weight, and blood pressure. Emerging evidence now indicates that these drugs may have a beneficial effect on outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Post-approval cardiovascular outcomes data for three of these agents (canagliflozin, empagliflozin, and dapagliflozin) showed an unexpected improvement in cardiovascular endpoints, including heart failure hospitalization and mortality, among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and established cardiovascular disease or risk factors. These studies were followed by a placebo controlled trial of dapagliflozin in patients with HFrEF both with and without T2DM, showing a reduction in all-cause mortality comparable to current guideline-directed HFrEF medical therapies such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. In this review, we discuss the current landscape of evidence, safety and adverse effects, and proposed mechanisms of action for use of these agents for patients with HFrEF. The United States (US) and European guidelines are reviewed, as are the current US federally approved indications for each SGLT2 inhibitor. Use of these agents in clinical practice may be limited by an uncertain insurance environment, especially in patients without T2DM. Finally, we discuss practical considerations for the cardiovascular clinician, including within-class differences of the SGLT2 inhibitors currently available on the US market (217/300).