Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to afflict millions of people worldwide. Patients with end-stage heart failure and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may be at risk for severe COVID-19 given a high prevalence of complex comorbidities and functional impaired immunity. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with end-stage heart failure and durable LVADs. Methods: The Trans-CoV-VAD registry is a multi-center registry of LVAD and cardiac transplant patients in the United States with confirmed COVID-19. Patient characteristics, exposure history, presentation, laboratory data, course, and clinical outcomes were collected by participating institutions and reviewed by a central data repository. This report represents the participation of the first 9 centers to report LVAD data into the registry. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in this cohort. The median age was 56 years (interquartile range, 46–68), 14 (35%) were women, and 21 (52%) were Black. Among the most common presenting symptoms were cough (41%), fever, and fatigue (both 38%). A total of 18% were asymptomatic at diagnosis. Only 43% of the patients reported either subjective or measured fever during the entire course of illness. Over half (60%) required hospitalization, and 8 patients (20%) died, often after lengthy hospitalizations. Conclusions: We present the largest case series of LVAD patients with COVID-19 to date. Understanding these characteristics is essential in an effort to improve the outcome of this complex patient population.

Background: Discussions of medication costs between patients and clinicians are infrequent and often suboptimal. In the context of recently introduced drugs that are effective but expensive, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction provide an ideal population to understand the perspectives of patients with chronic illness on medication cost and cost discussions. Methods: To explore patients’ perspectives on discussing out-of-pocket medication costs with clinicians, 49 adults, aged 44 to 70 years, with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were recruited from outpatient heart failure clinics. Descriptive qualitative analysis was performed on open-ended text data. Results: Participants who had prior medication-related cost discussions described their experience as generally positive, but about half of the participants had never had a cost discussion with their clinician. Most participants were open to cost discussions with clinicians and preferred that the clinician initiate discussions regarding medication cost. Importantly, these preferences held constant across reported levels of financial burden. Conclusions: These data suggest a substantial willingness on the part of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to incorporate cost discussions into their care and identify important aspects of these discussions for clinicians to consider when engaging in conversations where cost is relevant. Improving understanding about how to integrate patient preferences regarding cost discussions into clinical encounters is an important priority for advancing patient-centered care.

Background: Current guidelines recommend use of sacubitril‐valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Early data suggested low uptake of sacubitril‐valsartan, but contemporary data on real‐world use and their associated cost are limited. Methods and Results: This was a retrospective study of individuals enrolled in Optum Clinformatics, a national insurance claims data set from 2016 to 2018. We included all adult patients with HFrEF with 2 outpatient encounters or 1 inpatient encounter with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision ( ICD‐10 ), diagnosis of HFrEF and 6 months of continuous enrollment, also receiving β‐blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers within 6 months of HFrEF diagnosis. We included 70 245 patients with HFrEF, and 5217 patients (7.4%) received sacubitril‐valsartan prescriptions. Patients receiving care through a cardiologist compared with a primary care physician alone were more likely to receive sacubitril‐valsartan (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.52–1.71]). Monthly out‐of‐pocket (OOP) cost for sacubitril‐valsartan, compared with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, was higher for both commercially insured patients (mean, $69 versus $6.74) and Medicare Advantage (mean, $62 versus $2.52). For patients with commercial insurance, OOP cost was lower in 2016 than in 2018. For patients with Medicare Advantage, there was a significant geographic variation in the OOP costs across the country, ranging from $31 to $68 per month across different regions, holding all other patient‐related factors constant. Conclusions: Sacubitril‐valsartan use was infrequent among patients with HFrEF. Patients receiving care with a cardiologist were more likely to receive sacubitril‐valsartan. OOP costs remain high, potentially limiting use. Significant geographic variation in OOP costs, unexplained by patient factors, was noted.