Eva Varečková

Dr. Eva Varečková

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 November 2010 in Virology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZSZuzana Staneková
Zuzana Staneková
EVEva Varečková
Eva Varečková
Influenza A viruses belong to the best studied viruses, however no effective prevention against influenza infection has been developed. The emerging of still new escape variants of influenza A viruses causing epidemics and periodic worldwide pandemics represents a threat for human population. Therefore, current, hot task of influenza virus research is to look for a way how to get us closer to a universal vaccine. Combination of chosen conserved antigens inducing cross-protective antibody response with epitopes activating also cross-protective cytotoxic T-cells would offer an attractive strategy for improving protection against drift variants of seasonal influenza viruses and reduces the impact of future pandemic strains. Antigenically conserved fusion-active subunit of hemagglutinin (HA2 gp) and ectodomain of matrix protein 2 (eM2) are promising candidates for preparation of broadly protective HA2- or eM2-based vaccine that may aid in pandemic preparedness. Overall protective effect could be achieved by contribution of epitopes recognized by cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) that have been studied extensively to reach much broader control of influenza infection. In this review we present the state-of-art in this field. We describe known adaptive immune mechanisms mediated by influenza specific B- and T-cells involved in the anti-influenza immune defense together with the contribution of innate immunity. We discuss the mechanisms of neutralization of influenza infection mediated by antibodies, the role of CTL in viral elimination and new approaches to develop epitope based vaccine inducing cross-protective influenza virus-specific immune response.

20 October 2015 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSylvie Skalickova
Sylvie Skalickova
ZHZbynek Heger
Zbynek Heger
LKLudmila Krejcova
Ludmila Krejcova
VPVladimir Pekarik
Vladimir Pekarik
KBKarel Bastl
Karel Bastl
Rene KizekRene Kizek
Rene Kizek
The threat of a worldwide influenza pandemic has greatly increased over the past decade with the emergence of highly virulent avian influenza strains. The increased frequency of drug-resistant influenza strains against currently available antiviral drugs requires urgent development of new strategies for antiviral therapy, too. The research in the field of therapeutic peptides began to develop extensively in the second half of the 20th century. Since then, the mechanisms of action for several peptides and their antiviral prospect received large attention due to the global threat posed by viruses. Here, we discussed the therapeutic properties of peptides used in influenza treatment. Peptides with antiviral activity against influenza can be divided into three main groups. First, entry blocker peptides such as a Flupep that interact with influenza hemagglutinin, block its binding to host cells and prevent viral fusion. Second, several peptides display virucidal activity, disrupting viral envelopes, e.g., Melittin. Finally, a third set of peptides interacts with the viral polymerase complex and act as viral replication inhibitors such as PB1 derived peptides. Here, we present a review of the current literature describing the antiviral activity, mechanism and future therapeutic potential of these influenza antiviral peptides.

1 March 2007 in Journal of General Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGM. Gocník
M. Gocník
TFT. Fislová
T. Fislová
TST. Sládková
T. Sládková
VMV. Mucha
V. Mucha
FKF. Kostolanský
F. Kostolanský
EVEva Varečková
Eva Varečková
Four monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recognizing distinct antigenic sites on the HA2 glycopolypeptide of influenza virus A/Dunedin/4/73 (H3N2) have been tested forin vivoprotection. When applied intravenously before infection, three of them increased the survival of BALB/c mice infected with 1 LD50homologous virus. The protection resulted simultaneously in 2 days earlier clearance of virus from the lungs. These three antibodies inhibited the fusion activity of virus in previousin vitroexperiments. One of them, specific to N-terminal aa 1–38 of the HA2 glycopolypeptide, was also tested for protection against the heterologous virus A/Mississippi/1/85 (H3N2). Protection similar to that against the homologous virus was observed. The fourth mAb, without fusion-inhibition activity, did not protect mice. It is concluded that antibodies specific to the antigenically conserved HA2 glycopolypeptide that exhibit fusion-inhibition activity can contribute to the protection of infected mice and mediate more effective recovery from infection.

1 April 2008 in Journal of General Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGM. Gocník
M. Gocník
TFT. Fislová
T. Fislová
VMV. Mucha
V. Mucha
TST. Sládková
T. Sládková
GRG. Russ
G. Russ
EVEva Varečková
Eva Varečková
The haemagglutinin (HA) of influenza A virus consists of two glycopolypeptides designated HA1 and HA2. Antibodies recognizing HA1 inhibit virus haemagglutination, neutralize virus infectivity and provide good protection against infection, but do not cross-react with the HA of other subtypes. Little is known regarding the biological activities of antibodies against HA2. To study the role of antibodies directed against HA2 during influenza virus infection, two vaccinia virus recombinants (rVVs) were used expressing chimeric molecules of HA, in which HA1 and HA2 were derived from different HA subtypes. The KG-11 recombinant expressed HA1 from A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) virus and HA2 from A/NT/60 (H3N2) virus, whilst KG-12 recombinant expressed HA1 from A/NT/60 virus and HA2 from A/PR/8/34 virus. Immunization of BALB/c mice with rVV expressing HA2 of the HA subtype homologous to the challenge virus [A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) or A/Mississippi/1/85 (H3N2)] did not prevent virus infection, but nevertheless resulted in an increase in mice survival and faster elimination of virus from the lungs. Passive immunization with antibodies purified from mice immunized with rVVs confirmed that antibodies against HA2 were responsible for the described effect on virus infection. Based on the facts that HA2 is a rather conserved part of the HA and that antibodies against HA2, as shown here, may moderate virus infection, future vaccine design should deal with the problem of how to increase the HA2 antibody response.

1 February 2003 in Archives of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VMV. Mucha
V. Mucha
SWS.A. Wharton
S.A. Wharton
EVEva Varečková
Eva Varečková
FKF. Kostolanský
F. Kostolanský

1 March 2008 in Virus Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVEva Varečková
Eva Varečková
VMVojtech Mucha
Vojtech Mucha
FKFrantišek Kostolanský
František Kostolanský
LGLarisa V. Gubareva
Larisa V. Gubareva
AKAlexander Klimov
Alexander Klimov