There is a lack of research evidence on the risk–benefits of the various disinfectants in cleaning products and cleansing regimens. This systematic review compared the antimicrobial activity of various chemical disinfectants to disinfect the thermoplastic polymeric appliances in orthodontics. The study was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. An electronic search was conducted on Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Springer. Two authors independently investigated the risk of bias in duplication. A total of 225 articles were collected. After removing duplicates, 221 articles remained, and after filtering their titles and abstracts, 11 articles met eligibility qualifications remained. Finally, nine articles that met the criteria were selected. It showed that both over-the-counter orthodontic appliance cleaners and applied-chemical disinfectants were effective against bacteria. The duration and frequency of usage guidelines cannot be concluded.

Objectives: The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine the differences between planned and actual maxillary molar movements after the completion of treatment with an initial set of clear aligners including sequential maxillary molar distalization. Methods: The data records of 14 non-growing patients who completed orthodontic treatment with sequential maxillary molar distalization using clear aligners were retrospectively evaluated (n= 14, 4 males and 10 females, 33.61 ± 8.57 years). Data on planned tooth movements were obtained from ClinCheck software (ClinCheck Pro version 5.3). The amounts of actual tooth movements were obtained by performing superimposition of lateral cephalograms taken before and after treatment. The amounts of distal translation and tipping between planned and actual maxillary molar movements were compared with the paired Student’s t-test. Results: The statistically significant differences between planned and actual translation movements of maxillary first and second molars were shown after completing treatment with the first series of aligners (p < 0.05). The average actual amount of molar distalization on maxillary first molars was less than the planned amount by 1.32 ± 0.42 mm. Similarly, the average actual amount of molar distalization on maxillary second molars was less than the planned amount by 1.57 ± 0.45 mm. The accuracy for molar distalization, namely, the percentage of actual distal translation to planned movement, was 40.11% for maxillary first molars and 35.39% for maxillary second molars. However, the difference between the planned and actual angulation movements was not significant (p > 0.05). Conslusions: In conclusion, the amounts of actual distal translation of maxillary molars through the utilization of clear aligners were significantly lower than planned. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the degrees of actual and planned molar angulation movement.

This study aims to compare shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure (MOF) between ceramic and metal orthodontic brackets on glazed monolithic zirconia using non-woven polypropylene fiber adhesive. Sixty glazed and sintered zirconia blocks were divided into six groups and attached with orthodontic brackets as follows: CS, ceramic bracket with silane; CB, ceramic bracket with bonding agent; CBS, ceramic bracket with bonding agent and silane; MS, metal bracket with silane; MB, metal bracket with bonding agent; and MBS, metal bracket with bonding agent and silane. There was a statistically significant difference in mean SBS values (p < 0.001). The CS group showed the highest SBS value (23.42 ± 3.88 MPa). On the other hand, the lowest was found in the MB group, which was not statistically different from the CB group (3.26 ± 0.76 and 5.09 ± 1.50 MPa, respectively). The MS, MBS, and CBS groups showed no statistical difference compared to each other (15.57 ± 4.01, 13.23 ± 5.47, and 12.77 ± 4.43 MPa, respectively). SBS is highest when a ceramic bracket with silane is bonded to glazed monolithic zirconia.

The oral microbiome can be shifted if the patients wear the acrylic retainers for a lengthy period. It is essential to understand the components of the plaque in order to forestall the development of dental caries and gingivitis. The aim of this study is to report the bacterial communities that adhere to the acrylic retainers by full-length nanopore 16S sequencing. Six healthy participants were allocated into 2 groups (chemical tablet and brushing groups). Plaque samples were collected from the acrylic retainer surfaces before and after cleaning. The bacterial communities were reported using full-length nanopore 16S sequencing. The results showed that 7 distinct phyla were identified by sequencing. The most prevalent of these was the Firmicutes. We found a total of 72 genera. The most common microorganism across all samples was Streptococcus, followed by Neisseria, Rothia, and Gemella. The beta diversity showed a significant difference between before and after cleaning (p < 0.05). This study revealed the novel finding that a combination of chemical and mechanical cleaning methods was the most effective method of eliminating retainer biofilms. Moreover, retainer cleaning tablets did not alter the homeostatic balance of the bacterial communities adhering to the acrylic retainers.

Increasing demand for adult orthodontic treatment using clear aligners has highlighted challenges in bonding clear aligner attachments to various restorations. Specifically, the bond strength of clear aligner attachments to glazed monolithic zirconia has not been extensively studied. This study aims to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure (MOF) of conventional bonding methods versus Superbond C&B (4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement) for clear aligner attachments on glazed monolithic zirconia. Fifty sintered and glazed zirconia samples were divided into five groups and attached with clear aligner attachments: Si (silane), B (bonding agent), SiB (bonding agent and silane), SU (Superbond C&B), and SiSU (silane and Superbond C&B). SBS and MOF of these samples were analyzed. Results indicated a significant difference in bond strength among the groups. SiSU exhibited the highest bond strength, followed by SU, while B had the lowest bond strength. SEM analysis revealed that SiSU and SU predominantly exhibited mixed failure, indicating high bond strength without affecting the glazed layers of the zirconia. In contrast, B exhibited only adhesive failure at the interface, resulting in insufficient bond strength for effective orthodontic treatment. In conclusion, using 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement provides high bond strength for clear aligner attachments on glazed zirconia with minimal material damage during debonding.