Louena Shtrepi

Dr. Louena Shtrepi

Politecnico di Torino, Department of Energy, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
SBSonja Di Blasio
Sonja Di Blasio
Louena ShtrepiLouena Shtrepi
Louena Shtrepi
Giuseppina Emma PuglisiGiuseppina Emma Puglisi
Giuseppina Emma Puglisi
Arianna AstolfiArianna Astolfi
Arianna Astolfi
This cross-sectional survey has compared subjective outcomes obtained from workers in shared (2–5 occupants) and open-plan (+5 occupants) offices, related to irrelevant speech, which is the noise that is generated from conversations between colleagues, telephone calls and laughter. Answers from 1078 subjects (55% in shared offices and 45% in open-plan offices) have shown that irrelevant speech increases noise annoyance, decreases work performance, and increases symptoms related to mental health and well-being more in open-plan than in shared offices. Workers often use headphones with music to contrast irrelevant speech in open-plan offices, while they take a break, change their working space, close the door or work from home in shared offices. Being female, when there are more than 20 occupants, and working in southern cities without acoustic treatments in the office, make it more likely for the occupants to be annoyed by irrelevant speech noise in open-plan offices. While, working in southern cities and with acoustic treatments in the office makes it more likely that noise annoyance will be reported in shared offices. Finally, more than 70% of the interviewed in open-plan offices were willing to reduce their voice volumes when advised by a noise monitoring system with a lighting feedback.

27 June 2024 in Applied Acoustics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Francesco AlettaFrancesco Aletta
Francesco Aletta
AMAndrew Mitchell
Andrew Mitchell
TOTin Oberman
Tin Oberman
Jian KangJian Kang
Jian Kang
SKSara Khelil
Sara Khelil
Thulan NguyenThulan Nguyen
Thulan Nguyen

30 September 2023 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VFVirginia Isabella Fissore
Virginia Isabella Fissore
SFSilvia Fasano
Silvia Fasano
Giuseppina Emma PuglisiGiuseppina Emma Puglisi
Giuseppina Emma Puglisi
Louena ShtrepiLouena Shtrepi
Louena Shtrepi
Arianna AstolfiArianna Astolfi
Arianna Astolfi
People spend about 90% of their time in closed spaces such as residential and office environments, and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) has effects on their health, well-being, overall comfort and work productivity. The IEQ domains (i.e., thermal, acoustic, visual and indoor air quality) are able to influence office users’ work day and even cause the onset of diseases. This review aims at investigating IEQ in offices and the multidomain combined effects on occupants’ overall comfort. Studies published between 2016 and 2022 were summarized, focusing on four research questions formulated to deepen the knowledge on (i) IEQ perception and evaluation, (ii) IEQ indexes and parameters, (iii) factors that influence comfort perception and (iv) IEQ and comfort representation in space and time. For these research questions, a total of 29, 19, 10 and 9 studies, found on the Scopus database through a keywords search, were considered, respectively. The studies were included only if they appraised a multidomain approach. The results obtained for each research question reveal that: (i) Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) surveys are often applied to understand how occupants perceive IEQ, and in-field monitoring based on low-cost sensors is implemented more and more to acquire IEQ data, (ii) a set of indexes and parameters for IEQ assessment is not standardized yet, although some parameters are commonly used, (iii) personal factors like age and gender, and contextual factors like workstation location and office type, influence occupants’ comfort perception and (iv) dashboards are used to allow office end-users to visualize the indoor conditions of the environment.

1 November 2017 in Applied Acoustics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Simone SecchiSimone Secchi
Simone Secchi
Arianna AstolfiArianna Astolfi
Arianna Astolfi
GCGiulia Calosso
Giulia Calosso
DCDavid Casini
David Casini
GCGianfranco Cellai
Gianfranco Cellai
Louena ShtrepiLouena Shtrepi
Louena Shtrepi

1 June 2019 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElena Badino
Elena Badino
RMRoberto Manca
Roberto Manca
Louena ShtrepiLouena Shtrepi
Louena Shtrepi
CCCristina Calleri
Cristina Calleri
AAArianna Astolfi
Arianna Astolfi

27 June 2020 in Acoustics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Laura LabiaLaura Labia
Laura Labia
Louena ShtrepiLouena Shtrepi
Louena Shtrepi
Arianna AstolfiArianna Astolfi
Arianna Astolfi
This work deals with the improvement of the room acoustic quality of two medium sized meeting rooms through the investigation of the optimal placement of absorption and diffusive panels on the walls and ceiling. Acoustic measurements have been carried out in the existing untreated rooms with ODEON 13 room acoustics measurement and prediction software, and the Adobe Audition plugins Aurora. Simulations of different combinations of sound absorption and diffusion treatments have been carried out with the updated version of the software, ODEON 15. The panels were positioned in the meeting rooms following the guidelines of the DIN 18041 standard and the scientific literature. The results advise the application of absorptive materials on the ceiling or around the borders, creating a reflective middle area, and on the upper part of one the lateral walls, including the rear wall. Configurations with diffusers do not generally bring significant improvements. The Speech Transmission Index (STI) is a less sensitive parameter for the different acoustic scenarios, compared to Reverberation Time (T) and Clarity (C50). The research also outlined a design workflow, useful to successfully design meeting rooms and rooms for speech in general, which allows to determine the optimal number and location of acoustic panels and to minimize the costs.