Giulia Rogati

Mrs. Giulia Rogati

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2021 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELErica Liverani
Erica Liverani
GRGiulia Rogati
Giulia Rogati
SPStefania Pagani
Stefania Pagani
Silvia BroginiSilvia Brogini
Silvia Brogini
AFAlessandro Fortunato
Alessandro Fortunato
PCPaolo Caravaggi
Paolo Caravaggi

1 January 2019 in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GRGiulia Rogati
Giulia Rogati
Alberto LeardiniAlberto Leardini
Alberto Leardini
MOMaurizio Ortolani
Maurizio Ortolani
PCPaolo Caravaggi
Paolo Caravaggi
Background: Advancements in additive manufacturing, along with new 3D scanning tools, are increasingly fulfilling the technological need for custom devices in personalized medicine. In podiatry and in the footwear industry, custom orthotic and footwear solutions are often required to address foot pathologies or morphological alterations which cannot be managed with standard devices. While laser scanners are the current gold‐standard for 3D digitization of the foot shape, their costs limit their applications and diffusion, therefore traditional operator‐dependent casting methods are still in use. The aim of this study was to design and validate a novel 3D foot scanner based on the Microsoft Kinect sensor, allowing a 3D scan of the plantar shape of the foot to be acquired in weight‐bearing.Methods: The accuracy and repeatability of the prototypal foot scanner were investigated in a population of 14 asymptomatic healthy subjects, with no history of foot or lower limb injuries. The accuracy was estimated by comparing the Kinect foot scans with those obtained with a high‐resolution laser scanner used as reference. The repeatability was assessed by comparing scans of the same foot acquired in different sessions.Results: The inter‐subject average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the Kinect scans was lower than 3 mm for the whole plantar surface, and lower than 1.6 mm for the arch region alone, both in left and right feet. The repeatability, quantified as the average RMSE of pairwise comparisons between sessions, was 1.2 ± 0.4 mm.Conclusions: The present Kinect‐based 3D foot scanner showed optimal intra‐operator repeatability and its accuracy appears adequate to obtain 3D scans of the foot plantar surface suitable for different clinical applications. This device could represent a valid low‐cost alternative to expensive laser‐based scanners and could be used for automatic foot measurements, supporting the design of custom insoles and footwear.

19 May 2022 in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GRGiulia Rogati
Giulia Rogati
PCPaolo Caravaggi
Paolo Caravaggi
Alberto LeardiniAlberto Leardini
Alberto Leardini
Ankle‐Foot Orthoses (AFO) can be prescribed to allow drop‐foot patients to restore a quasi‐normal gait pattern. Standard off‐the‐shelf AFOs are cost‐effective solutions to treat most patients with foot and ankle weakness, but these devices have several limitations, especially in terms of comfort. Therefore, custom AFOs are increasingly adopted to address drop‐foot when standard solutions are not adequate. While the solid ones are the most common type of AFO, providing full stability and strong resistance to ankle plantarflexion, passive dynamic AFOs (PD‐AFOs) represent the ideal solution for patients with less severe ankle weakness. PD‐AFOs have a flexible calf shell, which can bend during the stance phase of walking and absorb energy that can be released to support the limb in the push‐off phase. The aim of this review is to assess the state‐of‐the‐art and identify the current limitations of PD‐AFOs. An extensive literature review was performed in Google Scholar to identify all studies on custom PD‐AFOs. Only those papers reporting on custom PD‐AFOs were included in the review. Non peer‐reviewed papers, abstract shorter than three pages, lecture notes and thesis dissertations were excluded from the analysis. Particular attention was given to the customization principles and the mechanical and functional tests. For each topic, the main results from all relevant papers are reported and summarized herein. There were 75 papers that corresponded to the search criteria. These were grouped according to the following macro‐topics: 16 focusing on scanning technologies and geometry acquisition; 14 on customization criteria; 19 on production techniques; 16 on mechanical testing, and 33 on functional testing. According to the present review, design and production of custom PD‐AFOs are becoming increasingly feasible due to advancements in 3D scanning techniques and additive manufacturing. In general, custom PD‐AFOs were shown to provide better comfort and improved spatio‐temporal parameters with respect to standard solutions. However, no customization principle to adapt PD‐AFO stiffness to the patient's degree of ankle impairment or mechanical/functional demand has thus far been proposed.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GRGiulia Rogati
Giulia Rogati
ALAlberto Leardini
Alberto Leardini
MOMaurizio Ortolani
Maurizio Ortolani
PCPaolo Caravaggi
Paolo Caravaggi
Background: Foot healthcare research is focusing increasingly on personalized orthotic and prosthetic devices to address patient‐specific morphology and ailments. Customization requires advanced 3D image processing tools to assess foot and leg geometrical parameters and alterations. The aim of this study is to present a new software for the measurement of the foot shape from 3D scans of the foot plantar surface.Methods: A Kinect‐based scanning device was used to acquire the 3D foot shape of 44 healthy subjects. A software was developed in Matlab to measure the foot main morphological parameters from foot scans. Principal Component Analysis was used to orientate the foot scans with respect to the same reference system. Accuracy, via percentage errors and Bland‐Altman plots, and correlation of the software‐based foot parameters were assessed against manual measurements. A normalized Arch Volume Index (nAVI) was proposed and correlated to the traditional Arch Index. Test‐retest Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was used to assess the inter‐session repeatability of foot measurements.Results: The average percentage error between software and manual measurements was 1.2 ± 0.8% for foot length, 9.1 ± 3.7% for foot width, 22.3 ± 13.5% for arch height and 23.1 ± 12.7% for arch depth. Very strong correlations were observed for foot length (R = 0.97) and foot width (R = 0.83), and strong correlations for arch height (R = 0.62) and arch depth (R = 0.74). nAVI was negatively correlated to the Arch Index (R = ‐0.54). A small difference was found between software and manual measurements of foot length (Δ = 0.92 mm), a software overestimation of foot width (Δ = 8.6 mm) and underestimation of arch height (Δ = ‐1.4%) and arch depth (Δ = ‐11%). Moderate to excellent repeatability was observed for all measurements (0.67–0.99).Conclusions: The present software appears capable to estimate the foot main morphological parameters without the need for skin markers or for identification of anatomical landmarks. Moreover, measurements are not affected by the foot orientation on the scanning device. The good accuracy and repeatability of measurements make the software a potentially useful operator‐independent tool for the assessment of foot morphological alterations and for orthotics customization. nAVI may be used for a more realistic classification of foot types when 3D foot images are available.

1 November 2021 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPaolo Caravaggi
Paolo Caravaggi
GRGiulia Rogati
Giulia Rogati
Alberto LeardiniAlberto Leardini
Alberto Leardini
MOMaurizio Ortolani
Maurizio Ortolani
MBMariachiara Barbieri
Mariachiara Barbieri
Isabel SaccoIsabel Sacco
Isabel Sacco

7 May 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PCPaolo Caravaggi
Paolo Caravaggi
AZAlessandro Zomparelli
Alessandro Zomparelli
GRGiulia Rogati
Giulia Rogati
MBMassimiliano Baleani
Massimiliano Baleani
RFRoberta Fognani
Roberta Fognani
Alberto LeardiniAlberto Leardini
Alberto Leardini
Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are medical devices prescribed to support the foot and ankle of drop-foot patients. Passive-dynamic AFOs (PD-AFOs) are an effective solution for less severe cases. While off-the-shelf PD-AFOs are rather inexpensive, they provide poor anatomical fit and do not account for the required patient-specific biomechanical support. Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and manufacturing technologies allow manufacturing PD-AFOs customized for the patient’s anatomy and functional needs. This paper aimed to report the overall procedure for designing and manufacturing a novel, fiberglass-reinforced polyamide, custom PD-AFO. The feasibility of the proposed procedure was tested in a case study. The methodology can be divided into the following steps: (i) foot and leg scanning, (ii) 3D design, and (iii) additive manufacturing via selective laser sintering. A custom PD-AFO was designed and manufactured for a 67-year-old male drop-foot patient following paraparesis in severe discarthrosis after spine stabilization surgery. AFO mechanical properties were measured via an ad hoc setup based on a servohydraulic testing machine. The functional outcome was assessed via gait analysis in three conditions: shod (no AFO), wearing an off-the-shelf PD-AFO, and wearing the patient-specific PD-AFO. As expected, wearing the PD-AFO resulted in increased ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase with respect to the shod condition. Sagittal rotations of the hip, knee, and ankle joints were similar across PD-AFO conditions, but the custom PD-AFO resulted in faster walking speed with respect to the off-the-shelf (walking speed: 0.91 m/s versus 0.85 m/s). Additionally, the patient scored the custom PD-AFO as more comfortable (VAS score: 9.7 vs. 7.3). While the present analysis should be extended to a larger cohort of drop-foot patients, the novel PD-AFO seems to offer a valid, custom solution for drop-foot patients not satisfied with standard orthotics.