Tanmay Lele

Prof. Dr. Tanmay Lele


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2019 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCharles T. Halfmann
Charles T. Halfmann
RSRhiannon M. Sears
Rhiannon M. Sears
AKAditya Katiyar
Aditya Katiyar
BBBrook W. Busselman
Brook W. Busselman
LALondon Kay Aman
London Kay Aman
Kyle RouxKyle Roux
Kyle Roux
Cell nuclei rupture following exposure to mechanical force and/or upon weakening of nuclear integrity, but nuclear ruptures are repairable. Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF), a small DNA-binding protein, rapidly localizes to nuclear ruptures; however, its role at these rupture sites is unknown. Here, we show that it is predominantly a nonphosphorylated cytoplasmic population of BAF that binds nuclear DNA to rapidly and transiently localize to the sites of nuclear rupture, resulting in BAF accumulation in the nucleus. BAF subsequently recruits transmembrane LEM-domain proteins, causing their accumulation at rupture sites. Loss of BAF impairs recruitment of LEM-domain proteins and nuclear envelope membranes to nuclear rupture sites and prevents nuclear envelope barrier function restoration. Simultaneous depletion of multiple LEM-domain proteins similarly inhibits rupture repair. LEMD2 is required for recruitment of the ESCRT-III membrane repair machinery to ruptures; however, neither LEMD2 nor ESCRT-III is required to repair ruptures. These results reveal a new role for BAF in the response to and repair of nuclear ruptures.

1 July 2010 in Biophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCT.J. Chancellor
T.J. Chancellor
JLJiyeon Lee
Jiyeon Lee
CTCharles K. Thodeti
Charles K. Thodeti
Tanmay LeleTanmay Lele
Tanmay Lele

7 September 2018 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tanmay LeleTanmay Lele
Tanmay Lele
RDRichard B. Dickinson
Richard B. Dickinson
GGGregg G. Gundersen
Gregg G. Gundersen
Positioning and shaping the nucleus represents a mechanical challenge for the migrating cell because of its large size and resistance to deformation. Cells shape and position the nucleus by transmitting forces from the cytoskeleton onto the nuclear surface. This force transfer can occur through specialized linkages between the nuclear envelope and the cytoskeleton. In response, the nucleus can deform and/or it can move. Nuclear movement will occur when there is a net differential in mechanical force across the nucleus, while nuclear deformation will occur when mechanical forces overcome the mechanical resistance of the various structures that comprise the nucleus. In this perspective, we review current literature on the sources and magnitude of cellular forces exerted on the nucleus, the nuclear envelope proteins involved in transferring cellular forces, and the contribution of different nuclear structural components to the mechanical response of the nucleus to these forces.

5 February 2013 in Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDavid B. Lovett
David B. Lovett
NSNandini Shekhar
Nandini Shekhar
JNJeffrey A. Nickerson
Jeffrey A. Nickerson
Kyle RouxKyle Roux
Kyle Roux
Tanmay LeleTanmay Lele
Tanmay Lele

1 December 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SASamer G. Alam
Samer G. Alam
QZQiao Zhang
Qiao Zhang
NPNripesh Prasad
Nripesh Prasad
YLYuan Li
Yuan Li
SCSrikar Chamala
Srikar Chamala
Tanmay LeleTanmay Lele
Tanmay Lele
Mechanical integration of the nucleus with the extracellular matrix (ECM) is established by linkage between the cytoskeleton and the nucleus. This integration is hypothesized to mediate sensing of ECM rigidity, but parsing the function of nucleus-cytoskeleton linkage from other mechanisms has remained a central challenge. Here we took advantage of the fact that the LINC (linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton) complex is a known molecular linker of the nucleus to the cytoskeleton, and asked how it regulates the sensitivity of genome-wide transcription to substratum rigidity. We show that gene mechanosensitivity is preserved after LINC disruption, but reversed in direction. Combined with myosin inhibition studies, we identify genes that depend on nuclear tension for their regulation. We also show that LINC disruption does not attenuate nuclear shape sensitivity to substrate rigidity. Our results show for the first time that the LINC complex facilitates mechano-regulation of expression across the genome.

21 April 2015 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SNSrujana Neelam
Srujana Neelam
TCT. J. Chancellor
T. J. Chancellor
YLYuan Li
Yuan Li
JNJeffrey A. Nickerson
Jeffrey A. Nickerson
Kyle RouxKyle Roux
Kyle Roux
Tanmay LeleTanmay Lele
Tanmay Lele
Significance: In a cell that is not actively moving, the shape of the nucleus and its central position are robustly maintained in a mechanical homeostasis. How nuclear shape and position are maintained despite the various types of intracellular forces that act on the nuclear surface is an open question. Dysregulated positioning and irregular nuclear shape are associated with a variety of human pathologies. In this paper we estimate the magnitude of the forces that are required to displace and deform the cell nucleus and identify the main molecules that resist these forces. Our results are important because they reveal how the nucleus has such a stable shape and position in the cell, despite the different forces acting on it.