Justin Gallagher

Dr. Justin Gallagher


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 February 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJustin Gallagher
Justin Gallagher
MSManoj Sivan
Manoj Sivan
MLMartin Levesley
Martin Levesley
Large-scale clinical trials have shown that rehabilitation robots are as affective as conventional therapy, but the cost-effectiveness is preventing their uptake. This study investigated whether a low-cost rehabilitation robot could be deployed in a home setting for rehabilitation of people recovering from stroke (n = 16) and whether clinical outcome measures correlated well with kinematic measures gathered by the robot. The results support the feasibility of patients independently using the robot with improvement in both clinical measures and kinematic data. We recommend using kinematic data early in an intervention to detect improvement while using a robotic device. The kinematic measures in the assessment task (hits/minute and normalised jerk) adequately pick up changes within a four-week period, thus allowing the rehabilitation regime to be adapted to suit the user’s needs. Estimating the long-term clinical benefit must be explored in future research.

15 December 2021 in Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAdam Giles Metcalf
Adam Giles Metcalf
JGJustin Gallagher
Justin Gallagher
AJAndrew E. Jackson
Andrew E. Jackson
MLMartin Levesley
Martin Levesley
Tracking patient progress through a course of robotic tele-rehabilitation requires constant position data logging and comparison, alongside periodic testing with no powered assistance. The test data must be compared with previous test attempts and an ideal baseline, for which a good understanding of the dynamics of the robot is required. The traditional dynamic modelling techniques for serial chain robotics, which involve forming and solving equations of motion, do not adequately describe the multi-domain phenomena that affect the movement of the rehabilitation robot. In this study, a multi-domain dynamic model for an upper limb rehabilitation robot is described. The model, built using a combination of MATLAB, SimScape, and SimScape Multibody, comprises the mechanical electro-mechanical and control domains. The performance of the model was validated against the performance of the robot when unloaded and when loaded with a human arm proxy. It is shown that this combination of software is appropriate for building a dynamic model of the robot and provides advantages over the traditional modelling approach. It is demonstrated that the responses of the model match the responses of the robot with acceptable accuracy, though the inability to model backlash was a limitation.

12 October 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDShuhao Dong
Shuhao Dong
JGJustin Gallagher
Justin Gallagher
AJAndrew Jackson
Andrew Jackson
MLMartin Levesley
Martin Levesley
Haptic information is essential in everyday activities, especially for visually impaired people in terms of real-world navigation. Since human haptic sensory processing is nonlinear, asymmetric vibrations have been widely studied to create a pulling sensation for the delivery of directional haptic cues. However, the design of an input control signal that generates asymmetric vibrations has not yet been parameterised. In particular, it is unclear how to quantify the asymmetry of the output vibrations to create a better pulling sensation. To better understand the design of an input control signal that generates haptic directional cues, we evaluated the effect of the pulling sensations corresponding to the three adjustable parameters (i.e., delay time, ramp-down step length, and cut-off voltage) in a commonly applied step-ramp input signal. The results of a displacement measurement and a psychophysical experiment demonstrate that when the quantified asymmetry ratio is in a range of 0.3430–0.3508 with an optimised cut-off voltage for our hand-held device, the haptic directional cues are better perceived by participants. Additionally, the results also showed a superior performance in haptic delivery by shear forces than normal forces.

1 August 2015
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
JGJustin Gallagher
Justin Gallagher
NPNick Preston
Nick Preston
RHRaymond Holt
Raymond Holt
MMMark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams
MLMartin Levesley
Martin Levesley
Andrew Patrick Hayes WeightmanAndrew Patrick Hayes Weightman
Andrew Patrick Hayes Weightman
Robotic devices are becoming more prevalent in rehabilitation of neurological disorders. Studies focus on clinical measures alongside robotic intervention, but assessment data can be collected as the subjects are using the rehabilitation device. As part of an autonomous robotic rehabilitation device in primary schools, this paper introduces an assessment tool that can engage subjects and measure performance on a more granular scale across an 8 week intervention. The deployments are split in to two parts of single and dual use with a 4 week washout period in-between. Analysis of the scores achieved on the assessment task show improvement on the rehabilitation system, and the data can also be used as part of an adaptive algorithm for the robotic assistance. The data on this pilot study with 11 children with Cerebral Palsy shows that the assessment task can pick up trends of improvement across the deployments. Although the data is noisy, there is significant difference over the washout period, which shows that improvement is maintained after rehabilitation training. The order of single and dual use of the device did not influence the improvement. The simplicity of the assessment tasks makes implementation easy, and collects enough data over a short period of time for significant changes.

1 April 2021 in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMK. Milley
K. Milley
JCJ. Camuso
J. Camuso
TLT. Logan
T. Logan
AAA. Anthony
A. Anthony
MVM. Villavicencio-Theoduloz
M. Villavicencio-Theoduloz
VTV. Ton
V. Ton