Due to the mechanistic coupling between solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and photosynthesis, SIF has an advantage over greenness-based vegetation indices in detecting drought. Since photosystem I (PSI) contributes very little to red SIF, red SIF is assumed to be more responsive to environmental stress than far-red SIF. However, in addition to affecting photosynthesis, drought also has an impact on vegetation chlorophyll concentration and thus affects the reabsorption process of red SIF. When these responses are entangled, the sensitivity of SIF in the red and far-red regions in response to drought is not yet clear. In this study, we conducted a water stress experiment on maize in the field and measured the upward and downward leaf SIF spectra by a spectrometer assembled with a leaf clip. Simultaneously, leaf-level active fluorescence was measured with a pulse-amplified modulation (PAM) fluorometer. We found that SIF, after normalization by photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and dark-adapted minimal fluorescence ($F_o$), is a better estimation of SIF yield. By comparing the wavelength-dependent link between SIF yield and nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) across the range of 660 to 800 nm, the results show that red SIF and far-red SIF have different sensitivities in response to drought. SIF yield in the far-red region has a strong and stable correlation with NPQ. Drought not only reduces red SIF due to photosynthetic regulation, but it also increases red SIF by reducing chlorophyll content (weakening the reabsorption effect). The co-existence of these two contradictory effects makes the red SIF of leaf level unable to reliably indicate NPQ. In addition, the red:far-red ratio of downward SIF and the ratio between the downward SIF and upward SIF at the red peak can be good indicators of chlorophyll content. These findings can help to interpret SIF variations in remote sensing techniques and fully exploit SIF information in red and far-red regions when monitoring plant water stress.

Fluctuations in illumination are one of the major sources for SIF retrieval errors during temporal continuous field measurements. In this study, we propose a method for evaluating the quality of SIF based on simultaneous measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), which are acquired using a quantum sensor at a sampling frequency higher than that obtained using spectral measurements. The proposed method is based on the coefficient of variation (known as relative standard deviation) of the high-frequency PAR during a SIF measurement to determine the quality of the SIF value. To evaluate the method, spectral and PAR data of a healthy maize canopy were collected under various illumination conditions, including clear, cloudy, and rapidly fluctuating illumination. The SIF values were retrieved by 3FLD, SFM, and SVD. The results showed that SFM and 3FLD were sensitive to illumination stability. The determination coefficients ($R^2$) between PAR and SIF extracted by SFM and 3FLD were higher than 0.8 on clear and cloudy days and only approximately 0.48 on the day with rapidly fluctuating illumination. By removing the unqualified data using the proposed method, the $R^2$ values of SFM and 3FLD on the day of rapidly fluctuating illumination significantly increased to 0.72. SVD was insensitive to illumination stability. The $R^2$ values of SVD on days with clear, cloudy, and rapidly fluctuating illumination were 0.73, 0.76, and 0.61, respectively. By removing the unqualified data, the $R^2$ values of SVD were increased to 0.66 on the day with rapidly fluctuating illumination. The results indicated that the quality assessment method based on high-frequency PAR data can eliminate the incorrect SIFs due to unstable illumination. The method can be used to extract more accurate and reliable SIF datasets from long-term field observations for the study of the relationship between SIF and vegetation photosynthesis.