In this study, we develop reliable and practical virtual coiling and stenting methods for intracranial aneurysm surgical planning. Since the purpose of deploying coils and stents is to provide device geometries for subsequent accurate post-treatment computational fluid dynamics analysis, we do not need to accurately capture all the details such as the stress and force distribution for the devices and vessel walls. Our philosophy for developing these methods is to balance accuracy and practicality. We consider the mechanical properties of the devices and recapitulate the clinical practice using a finite element method (FEM) approach. At the same time, we apply some simplifications for FEM modeling to make our methods efficient. For the virtual coiling, the coils are modeled as 3D Euler–Bernoulli beam elements, which is computationally efficient and provides good geometry representation. During the stent deployment process, the stent–catheter system is transformed according to the centerline of the parent vessel since the final configuration of the stent is not dependent of the deployment history. The aneurysm and vessel walls are assumed to be rigid and are fully constrained during the simulation. All stent–catheter system and coil–catheter system are prepared and packaged as a library which contains all types of stents, coils and catheters, which improves the efficiency of surgical planning process. The stent was delivered to the suitable position during the clinical treatment, achieving good expansion and apposition of the stent to the arterial wall. The coil was deployed into the aneurysm sac and deformed to different shapes because of the stored strain energy during coil package process and the direction of the microcatheter. The method which we develop here could become surgical planning for intracranial aneurysm treatment in the clinical workflow.

Objective: To investigate the relationship between fibrin deposition and “no‐reflow” within microcirculation after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Materials and methods: Experiments were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. An experimental AIS model was induced in C57BL/6 mice by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) via the photothrombotic method. Mice were randomly assigned to non‐thrombolytic or thrombolytic treated groups (n = 12 per group). The modified Neurological Severity Score and Fast Beam Balance Test were performed by a researcher blinded to the treatment method. MRI was utilized to evaluate all of the mice. An FXIIIa‐targeted probe was applied to detect fibrin deposition in acute ischemic brain regions by fluorescence imaging. Necrosis and pathological changes of brain tissue were estimated via Hematoxylin and eosin staining while fibrin deposition was observed by immunohistochemistry.Results: Thrombolytic therapy improved AIS clinical symptoms. The infarct area of non‐thrombolytic treated mice was significantly greater than that of the thrombolytic treated mice (p < .0001). Fluorescent imaging indicated fibrin deposition in ischemic brain tissue in both groups, with less fibrin in non‐thrombolytic treated mice than thrombolytic treated mice, though the difference was not significant. Brain cells with abnormal morphology, necrosis, and liquefication were observed in the infarcted area for both groups. Clotted red blood cells (RBCs) and fibrin build‐up in capillaries were found near the ischemic area in both non‐thrombolytic and thrombolytic treated groups of mice.Conclusion: Fibrin deposition and stacked RBCs contribute to microcirculation no‐reflow in AIS after thrombolytic therapy.

Background: Hemodynamics play an important role in intracranial aneurysm (IA) initiation, growth, and rupture. Yet there remains no definitive quantitative analysis between abnormal hemodynamics and geometrical risk of IA development. Objective: The present study aims to investigate whether abnormal hemodynamics in IA sacs can be predicted by surrogate geometric markers. Methods: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed on paraclinoid aneurysms derived from digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of 104 IAs in 104 patients. Four basic IA geometric parameters including maximum height, perpendicular height, maximum width, and neck diameter were measured. Abnormal hemodynamics were defined and quantified as the surface area exposed to low wall shear stress (WSS) and high oscillatory shear index (OSI) using objectively-defined thresholds. Relationships between abnormal hemodynamics and specific geometric parameters were analyzed via multiple linear regression. Results: Adjusting for age, sex, and other clinical characteristics, multiple linear regression revealed a significant relationship (p < 0.001) between abnormal hemodynamics and both maximum width (β ≈ 1.2) and neck diameter (β ≈ −0.4), but not maximum height or perpendicular height. These findings were shown to be independent of the choice of abnormal hemodynamic indicators and threshold levels. Conclusions: Maximum width and neck diameter of IA sacs are robust surrogates of exposure to abnormal hemodynamics. Risk of rupture may be increased with wider aneurysms with narrower necks for paraclinoid aneurysms.

Background: Using the finishing coils to densely pack the aneurysm neck is necessary. However, the exact hemodynamic effect of finishing coils in packing the aneurysm neck is unknown.Objective: To evaluate the hemodynamic characteristics of finishing coils to densely pack the aneurysm neck, using finite element method simulation.Methods: A computational study was performed based on a 44-year-old female patient with an unruptured wide-necked carotid-ophthalmic artery aneurysm treated with low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent-assisted coil embolization. Four computational fluid dynamics models including pre-treatment, post-stenting, common stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE), and common SACE with finishing coils were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively.Results: Compared with the baseline of pretreatment model (100%), sac-averaged velocity in post-stenting, common SACE, and common SACE with finishing coil models decreased to 95.68%, 24.38%, and 13.20%, respectively; high flow volume (>0.1 m/s) around the aneurysm neck decreased to 92.19%, 9.59%, and 5.57%, respectively; and mean wall shear stress increased or decreased to 107%, 25.94%, and 23.89%, respectively.Conclusion: Finishing coils to densely pack the aneurysm neck can generate favorable hemodynamic modifications, which may decrease the recurrence.

Background: Straightening of parent vessels happens for stent-assisted coiling embolization (SACE) treatment of intracranial aneurysms. This study aims to investigate aneurysmal hemodynamic modifications caused by stent-induced vessel straightening. Methods: Stent and coil deployments of a SACE-treated distal bifurcation aneurysm by finite element method were performed first with the preoperative (not straightened, NS) and postoperative (straightened, S) vessel models respectively. Computational fluid dynamics were then performed for eight models, including (I) NS only model, (II) NS+stent model, (III) NS+coils model, (IV) NS+stent+coils model, (V) S only model, (VI) S+stent model, (VII) S+coils model, and (VIII) S+stent+coils model. Finally, changes in aneurysmal flow velocity, isovelocity surface and wall shear stress (WSS) were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: The flow was less in the S models than that in the corresponding NS models. Coils blocked most of the flow into the aneurysm sac in both NS models and S models and vessel straightening had more profound effect on the high aneurysmal flow volume reduction than coiling, while stenting generated adverse effect on flow reduction. Taking the NS only model as baseline (100%), the sac-averaged velocities of models II to VIII were 112%, 36%, 42%, 45%, 39%, 12%, 13%, and high flow volumes were 119%, 21%, 30%, 10%, 8%, 3%, 3%, while the sac-averaged WSSs were 106%, 37%, 44%, 41%, 35%, 17% and 24%, respectively. Conclusions: Stent-induced vessel straightening combined coil embolization has the best performance in hemodynamic modifications and may reduce the recurrence rate, whereas stenting may generate adverse effect on hemodynamic alterations.