The prevalence of wheat allergy has reached significant levels in many countries. Therefore, wheat is a major global food safety and public health issue. Animal models serve as critical tools to advance the understanding of the mechanisms of wheat allergenicity to develop preventive and control methods. A comprehensive review on the molecular mechanisms of wheat allergenicity using animal models is unavailable at present. There were two major objectives of this study: To identify the lessons that animal models have taught us regarding the molecular mechanisms of wheat allergenicity and to identify the strengths, challenges, and future prospects of animal models in basic and applied wheat allergy research. Using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, we retrieved and critically analyzed the relevant articles and excluded celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Our analysis shows that animal models can provide insight into the IgE epitope structure of wheat allergens, effects of detergents and other chemicals on wheat allergenicity, and the role of genetics, microbiome, and food processing in wheat allergy. Although animal models have inherent limitations, they are critical to advance knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of wheat allergenicity. They can also serve as highly useful pre-clinical testing tools to develop safer genetically modified wheat, hypoallergenic wheat products, novel pharmaceuticals, and vaccines.

Wheat protein is considered a major type of food allergen in many countries including the USA. The mechanisms of allergenicity of wheat proteins are not well understood at present. Both adjuvant-based and adjuvant-free mouse models are reported for this food allergy. However, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underlying wheat allergenicity in these two types of models are similar or different. Therefore, we compared the molecular mechanisms in a novel adjuvant-free (AF) model vs. a conventional alum-adjuvant (AA) model of wheat allergy using salt-soluble wheat protein (SSWP). In the AF model, Balb/cJ mice were sensitized with SSWP via skin exposure. In the AA model, mice were sensitized by an intraperitoneal injection of SSWP with alum. In both models, allergic reactions were elicited using an identical protocol. Robust IgE as well as mucosal mast cell protein-1 responses were elicited similarly in both models. However, an analysis of the spleen immune markers identified strikingly different molecular activation patterns in these two models. Furthermore, a number of immune markers associated with intrinsic allergenicity were also identified in both models. Since the AF model uses skin exposure without an adjuvant, the mechanisms in the AF model may more closely simulate the human wheat allergenicity mechanisms from skin exposure in occupational settings such as in the baking industry.

Wheat is a prominent allergenic food that can trigger life-threatening anaphylaxis. Presently, it remains unclear whether wheat glutenin (WG) extract possesses inherent sensitization potential independently, without the use of adjuvants, and whether it can sensitize mice to the extent of inducing life-threatening systemic anaphylaxis. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that repeated skin exposures to WG extract without adjuvant will sensitize mice with the resultant anaphylactic reaction upon systemic WG challenge. Balb/c mice were bred and maintained on a strict plant protein-free diet and were repeatedly exposed to a WG extract or vehicle once a week for 9 weeks. WG-specific (s)IgE and total (t)IgE levels were quantified. Mice were challenged with WG extract to induce anaphylactic reactions as measured by hypothermic shock response (HSR) and mucosal mast cell degranulation response (MMCR). We also conducted proteomic analysis of 120 spleen immune markers. These skin-sensitized mice exhibited exposure-dependent IgE responses and near-fatal anaphylaxis upon challenge. Proteomic analysis identified seven dramatically elevated immune biomarkers in anaphylactic mice. These data reveal that WG is intrinsically allergenic, and that chronic skin exposure to WG extract can prime the mice for potentially fatal anaphylaxis.

Gluten hypersensitivity is characterized by the production of IgE antibodies against specific wheat proteins (allergens) and a myriad of clinical allergic symptoms including life-threatening anaphylaxis. Currently, the only recommended treatment for gluten hypersensitivity is the complete avoidance of gluten. There have been extensive efforts to develop dietary-based novel therapeutics for combating this disorder. There were four objectives for this study: (i) to compile the current understanding of the mechanism of gluten hypersensitivity; (ii) to critically evaluate the outcome from preclinical testing of novel therapeutics in animal models; (iii) to determine the potential of novel dietary-based therapeutic approaches under development in humans; and (iv) to synthesize the outcomes from these studies and identify the gaps in research to inform future translational research. We used Google Scholar and PubMed databases with appropriate keywords to retrieve published papers. All material was thoroughly checked to obtain the relevant data to address the objectives. Our findings collectively demonstrate that there are at least five promising dietary-based therapeutic approaches for mitigating gluten hypersensitivity in development. Of these, two have advanced to a limited human clinical trial, and the others are at the preclinical testing level. Further translational research is expected to offer novel dietary-based therapeutic options for patients with gluten hypersensitivity in the future.

Wheat allergies are potentially life-threatening and, therefore, have become a major health concern at the global level. It is largely unknown at present whether genetic variation in allergenicity potential exists among hexaploid, tetraploid and diploid wheat species. Such information is critical in establishing a baseline allergenicity map to inform breeding efforts to identify hyper-, hypo- and non-allergenic varieties. We recently reported a novel mouse model of intrinsic allergenicity using the salt-soluble protein extract (SSPE) from durum, a tetraploid wheat (Triticum durum). Here, we validated the model for three other wheat species [hexaploid common wheat (Triticum aestivum), diploid einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum), and the ancient diploid wheat progenitor, Aegilops tauschii], and then tested the hypothesis that the SSPEs from wheat species will exhibit differences in relative allergenicities. Balb/c mice were repeatedly exposed to SSPEs via the skin. Allergic sensitization potential was assessed by specific (s) IgE antibody responses. Oral anaphylaxis was quantified by the hypothermic shock response (HSR). The mucosal mast cell response (MMCR) was determined by measuring mast cell protease in the blood. While T. monococcum elicited the least, but significant, sensitization, others were comparable. Whereas Ae. taushcii elicited the least HSR, the other three elicited much higher HSRs. Similarly, while Ae. tauschii elicited the least MMCR, the other wheats elicited much higher MMCR as well. In conclusion, this pre-clinical comparative mapping strategy may be used to identify potentially hyper-, hypo- and non-allergenic wheat varieties via crossbreeding and genetic engineering methods.

Wheat is a staple and nutritious food that is consumed globally. However, it is identified as a major allergenic food because of its capacity to trigger life-threatening systemic anaphylaxis. The specific mechanisms that underlie this systemic anaphylaxis in wheat allergy are incompletely understood. As a result, several rodent models have been developed to study anaphylaxis in wheat allergies. In this paper, we have conducted a comprehensive review of wheat-induced anaphylaxis using Google Scholar and PubMed databases with relevant keywords. The following objectives were addressed: (1) to determine the complexity of wheat-induced anaphylaxis; (2) to summarize the role of genetic susceptibility in wheat anaphylaxis; (3) to identify the environmental factors involved in the development of wheat anaphylaxis; (4) to map the current status of mechanisms involved in wheat anaphylaxis; (5) to identify the approaches, strengths, and limitations of rodent models of wheat anaphylaxis; and (6) to identify challenges and opportunities in this area of science. Our findings provide a comprehensive updated critical resource for the future research agenda in wheat allergy-associated anaphylaxis, particularly using rodent models as attractive pre-clinical tools.