Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT), the fat surrounding peripheral blood vessels, is protective and reduces the contraction of blood vessels in health. PVAT is composed of adipocytes, stromal cells, and immune cells. Recent work supports eosinophils as one of the cell types key to the anti-contractile nature of PVAT in health. Hence, we hypothesized that there exists a basally activated immune cell community in healthy PVAT that is distinctly different from non-PVAT fats. PVATs were from around mesenteric resistance vessels (MRPVAT – white fat) and thoracic aorta (APVAT – brown fat). Non-PVATs included retroperitoneal (RP fat – white fat) and subscapular (SS fat – brown fat) while the spleen was a positive control. Tissues were harvested from adult male and female Sprague Dawley rats. Six primary immune cell types were identified in PVATs. T cells (CD4 and CD8), B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, mast cells, and neutrophils in the stromal vascular fraction of each fat were identified using nine-color flow cytometry. PVATs contained a higher number of total immune cells vs. their respective non-PVAT fats in females. Females had a higher number of T cells in MRPVAT vs. males. Females also had a greater number of T cells and total immune cells in APVAT vs. males. Further, activation, differentiation, and/or polarization of various immune cell types were similarly determined by flow cytometry. PVATs were similar to their respective non-PVAT fats in density of recently activated B cells (B220+ CD25+). However, MRPVAT in females had a higher number of naïve CD4 T cells vs. MRPVAT in males and APVAT in females. MRPVAT also had denser naïve CD8 T cells vs. APVAT in females. Overall, this research for the first time has identified a community of discrete populations of immune cells (naive/recently activated/regulatory/memory) in healthy PVATs. Contrary to our hypothesis, PVATs are more similar than different in density to their respective non-PVAT fats.
The prevalence of wheat allergy has reached significant levels in many countries. Therefore, wheat is a major global food safety and public health issue. Animal models serve as critical tools to advance the understanding of the mechanisms of wheat allergenicity to develop preventive and control methods. A comprehensive review on the molecular mechanisms of wheat allergenicity using animal models is unavailable at present. There were two major objectives of this study: To identify the lessons that animal models have taught us regarding the molecular mechanisms of wheat allergenicity and to identify the strengths, challenges, and future prospects of animal models in basic and applied wheat allergy research. Using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, we retrieved and critically analyzed the relevant articles and excluded celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Our analysis shows that animal models can provide insight into the IgE epitope structure of wheat allergens, effects of detergents and other chemicals on wheat allergenicity, and the role of genetics, microbiome, and food processing in wheat allergy. Although animal models have inherent limitations, they are critical to advance knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of wheat allergenicity. They can also serve as highly useful pre-clinical testing tools to develop safer genetically modified wheat, hypoallergenic wheat products, novel pharmaceuticals, and vaccines.
27 September 2017 in International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Background: Wheat allergy and other immune-mediated disorders triggered by wheat proteins are growing at an alarming rate for reasons not well understood. A mouse model to study hypersensitivity responses to salt-soluble wheat protein (SSWP) extract is currently unavailable. Here we tested the hypothesis that SSWP extract from wheat will induce sensitization as well as allergic disease in mice. Methods: Female BALB/cJ mice were weaned onto a plant protein-free diet. The mice were injected a total of 4 times with an SSWP (0.01 mg/mouse) fraction extracted from durum wheat along with alum as an adjuvant. Blood was collected biweekly and SSWP-specific IgE (SIgE) and total IgE (TIgE) levels were measured using ELISA. Systemic anaphylaxis upon intraperitoneal injection with SSWP was quantified by hypothermia shock response (HSR). Mucosal mast cell degranulation was measured by the elevation of mMCP-1 in the blood. The mice were monitored for dermatitis. Skin tissues were used in histopathology and for measuring cytokine/chemokine/adhesion molecule levels using a protein microarray system. Results: Injection with SSWP resulted in time-dependent SIgE antibody responses associated with the elevation of TIgE concentration. Challenge with SSWP elicited severe HSR that correlated with a significant elevation of plasma mMCP-1 levels. Sensitized mice developed facial dermatitis associated with mast cell degranulation. Lesions expressed significant elevation of Th2/Th17/Th1 cytokines and chemokines and E-selectin adhesion molecule. Conclusion: Here we report a mouse model of anaphylaxis and atopic dermatitis to SSWP extract that may be used for further basic and applied research on wheat allergy.
Wheat protein is considered a major type of food allergen in many countries including the USA. The mechanisms of allergenicity of wheat proteins are not well understood at present. Both adjuvant-based and adjuvant-free mouse models are reported for this food allergy. However, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underlying wheat allergenicity in these two types of models are similar or different. Therefore, we compared the molecular mechanisms in a novel adjuvant-free (AF) model vs. a conventional alum-adjuvant (AA) model of wheat allergy using salt-soluble wheat protein (SSWP). In the AF model, Balb/cJ mice were sensitized with SSWP via skin exposure. In the AA model, mice were sensitized by an intraperitoneal injection of SSWP with alum. In both models, allergic reactions were elicited using an identical protocol. Robust IgE as well as mucosal mast cell protein-1 responses were elicited similarly in both models. However, an analysis of the spleen immune markers identified strikingly different molecular activation patterns in these two models. Furthermore, a number of immune markers associated with intrinsic allergenicity were also identified in both models. Since the AF model uses skin exposure without an adjuvant, the mechanisms in the AF model may more closely simulate the human wheat allergenicity mechanisms from skin exposure in occupational settings such as in the baking industry.
1 January 2019 in Journal of Immunological Methods