Yu Xin

Dr. Yu Xin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 July 2023 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLRenshan Li
Renshan Li
XGXingyi Guo
Xingyi Guo
JHJianming Han
Jianming Han
QYQingpeng Yang
Qingpeng Yang
WZWeidong Zhang
Weidong Zhang
SWSilong Wang
Silong Wang

25 May 2022 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YXYu Xin
Yu Xin
XGXin Guan
Xin Guan
XFXiao Fuming
Xiao Fuming
WZWeidong Zhang
Weidong Zhang
QYQingpeng Yang
Qingpeng Yang
LCLong-Chi Chen
Long-Chi Chen
Soil acidification is an important cause of the productivity decline of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook)—one of the most important timber species in China. Although liming is an effective measure for reversing the effects of soil acidification, the effects on the morphologies and nutrients of different functional roots remain ambiguous. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of liming on fine root traits of Chinese fir seedlings between two root function types (absorptive roots (AR) and transport roots (TR)). Chinese fir seedlings with equal performance were planted in each pot with two acidification soils (pH 3.6 and pH 4.3) and three levels of liming (0, 1000, and 4000 kg CaO ha−1). Our data showed that liming had no effect on the root biomass (RB) of AR and TR in mildly acidified soil, but it decreased the RB in severely acidified soil. Specific root length (SRL) of AR and TR were significantly increased by 24% and 27% with a high liming dose in mildly acidified soil, respectively. The specific root areas (SRA) of AR and TR were significantly increased by 10% and 22% with a high liming dose in mildly acidified soil, respectively. Furthermore, root N concentrations were significantly increased by 26% and 30% in AR and TR with a high liming dose in mildly acidified soil, respectively. Root P concentration of AR was significantly increased by 21% with a high liming dose in mildly acidified soil while root Ca concentration was significantly increased with all treatments. A similar trend was also observed in the Ca/Al ratio of roots. Both low and high doses of liming decreased the root Al concentration of AR by 26% and 31% in mildly acidified soil, respectively; however, there was no significant effect on TR in both soils. Our findings indicated that liming could alleviate Al toxicity to fine roots and increase root investment efficiency and absorption capacity. Liming also had coordinate effects on SRL, SRA, Root tissue density (RTD), N, P, Ca and Ca/Al between AR and TR. Our study suggested that to gain a comprehensive understanding of plant growth strategy, researchers in future studies must consider different functional roots rather than just the absorption part. Our results also revealed that the root system became more “acquisitive” due to the remediation of Al toxicity, which may be an important mechanism underlying the increment of the productivity of Chinese fir plantations undergoing liming.

26 September 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YXYu Xin
Yu Xin
LCLin Chao
Lin Chao
WZWeidong Zhang
Weidong Zhang
LCLongchi Chen
Longchi Chen
QYQingpeng Yang
Qingpeng Yang
SWSilong Wang
Silong Wang
Soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization represents one of the largest fluxes in the global carbon cycle. Numerous studies have shown that soil organic carbon decomposition was largely changed owing to the addition of litter, however very few studies have focused on the role of plant organs in the priming effects (PEs). Here, we studied the effects of different Pinus massoniana organs (fresh leaf, leaf litter, twigs, absorptive fine roots, and transport fine roots) on C4 soil respiration by applying the 13C isotopic natural abundance method. Results showed that the effects of plant organs on PEs were significantly different at the end of 210 days incubation, which can be ascribed to contrasting organs traits especially non-structural carbohydrates and water-soluble compounds. Transport fine roots and fresh leaf induced positive PE, whereas absorptive fine roots induced negative PE. Leaf litter did not change the native SOC decomposition. Plant organ addition can change the microbial community and result in the reduction of bacteria-to-fungi ratio. Our results suggest that with regard to determining the PE of the entire ecosystem, using fresh leaf to represent leaf litter and aboveground to represent underground is implausible.

29 April 2026 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WZWenhui Zheng
Wenhui Zheng
YXYu Xin
Yu Xin
MWMenglei Wu
Menglei Wu
JZJingling Zhao
Jingling Zhao
XZXiufang Zheng
Xiufang Zheng
Fuzhong WuFuzhong Wu
Fuzhong Wu
Acid rain is a severe global environmental issue, and clarifying its impacts on litter decomposition and underlying mechanisms is critical for accurately forecasting future climate change. Litter consists of components (e.g., non-structural carbohydrates, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose) with distinct decomposition resistance, but how acid rain affects these components to modulate overall litter decomposition across different decomposition stages remains unclear. Therefore, a microcosm experiment was conducted to determine decomposition rates of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) litter and its components based on litter mass loss under different simulated acid rain intensities (pH 4.5, moderate acid rain, MA; pH 3.0, severe acid rain, SA; and pH ≈ 7.0, tap water, CK) over two decomposition stages (0–5 months: initial decomposition stage; 6–16 months: late decomposition stage). Meanwhile, to analyze the factors influencing the litter decomposition rate, soil samples were collected at 5 and 16 months of decomposition for soil property analysis. Results showed that MA had no significant effect on litter decomposition in either stage. Conversely, SA led to a significant 43.7% increase in the litter decomposition rate in the initial decomposition stage, driven by its acid dissolution effect that accelerated the decomposition of cellulose and hemicellulose. However, SA significantly decreased the decomposition rate by 42.0% in the late decomposition stage by inhibiting the decomposition of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, which was due to the reduced activities of soil peroxidase and xylosidase under soil acidification. Notably, neither MA nor SA significantly affected the litter decomposition rate over the entire decomposition period (0–16 months). This study indicates that acid rain’s effect on litter decomposition depends on its intensity and decomposition stage, emphasizing the necessity of distinguishing litter components and decomposition stages to explore its underlying mechanisms and precisely predict global climate change.