Confocal Microwave Imaging (CMI) for the early detection of breast cancer has been under development for over two decades and is currently going through early-phase clinical evaluation. The image reconstruction algorithm is a key signal processing component of any CMI-based breast imaging system and impacts the efficacy of CMI in detecting breast cancer. Several image reconstruction algorithms for CMI have been developed since its inception. These image reconstruction algorithms have been previously evaluated and compared, using both numerical and physical breast models, and healthy volunteer data. However, no study has been performed to evaluate the performance of image reconstruction algorithms using clinical patient data. In this study, a variety of imaging algorithms, including both data-independent and data-adaptive algorithms, were evaluated using data obtained from a small-scale patient study conducted at the University of Calgary. Six imaging algorithms were applied to reconstruct 3D images of five clinical patients. Reconstructed images for each algorithm and each patient were compared to the available clinical reports, in terms of abnormality detection and localisation. The imaging quality of each algorithm was evaluated using appropriate quality metrics. The results of the conventional Delay-and-Sum algorithm and the Delay-Multiply-and-Sum (DMAS) algorithm were found to be consistent with the clinical information, with DMAS producing better quality images compared to all other algorithms.

We present preliminary results from a method for estimating the optimal effective permittivity for reconstructing microwave-radar images. Using knowledge of how microwave-radar images are formed, we identify characteristics that are typical of good images, and define a fitness function to measure the relative image quality. We build a polynomial interpolant of the fitness function in order to identify the most likely permittivity values of the tissue. To make the estimation process more efficient, the polynomial interpolant is constructed using a locally and dimensionally adaptive sampling method that is a novel combination of stochastic collocation and polynomial chaos. Examples, using a series of simulated, experimental and patient data collected using the Tissue Sensing Adaptive Radar system, which is under development at the University of Calgary, are presented. These examples show how, using our method, accurate images can be reconstructed starting with only a broad estimate of the permittivity range.

A second-generation monostatic radar system to measure microwave reflections from the human breast is presented and analyzed. The present system can measure the outline of the breast with an accuracy of ±1 mm and precisely place the microwave sensor in an adaptive matter such that microwaves are normally incident on the skin. Microwave reflections are measured between 10 MHz to 12 GHz with sensitivity of 65 to 75 dB below the input power and a total scan time of 30 min for 140 locations. The time domain reflections measured from a volunteer show fidelity above 0.98 for signals in a single scan. Finally, multiple scans of a breast phantoms demonstrate the consistency of the system in terms of recorded reflection, outline measurement, and image reconstruction.

Microwave radar imaging is promising as a complementary medical imaging modality. However, the unique nature of the images means interpretation can be difficult. As a result, it is important to understand the sources of image differences, and how much variability is inherent in the imaging system itself. To address this issue, we compare the effectiveness of six different measures of image similarity for quantifying the similarity (or difference) between two microwave radar images. The structural similarity index has become the de facto standard for image comparison, but we propose that useful information can be acquired from a measure known as the Modified Hausdorff Distance. We apply each measure to image pairs from sequential scans of both phantoms and volunteers. We find that rather than using a single value to quantify the image similarity, by computing a number of values that are designed to capture different image aspects, we can better assess the ways in which the images differ.

Microwave imaging for biomedical applications is a growing field that shows promise in early patient studies. Interpretation of preclinical imaging results is difficult, in part due to an incomplete understanding of the imaging operator. In this paper, near-field beamforming is demonstrated to be analogous to synthetic aperture radar, and both imaging methods are shown to depend on several simplifying assumptions. The influence of these assumptions is analyzed using analytical and simulated models, and the results are confirmed in an experimental setup. These observations are further explored in application to simulations of realistic breast models as well as patient data.