Frank Norbert Mwiine

Prof. Frank Norbert Mwiine

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2016 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNLuke Nyakarahuka
Luke Nyakarahuka
CKClovice Kankya
Clovice Kankya
RKRandi Krontveit
Randi Krontveit
BMBenjamin Mayer
Benjamin Mayer
FMFrank Norbert Mwiine
Frank Norbert Mwiine
ESEystein Skjerve
Eystein Skjerve
Ebola and Marburg virus diseases are said to occur at a low prevalence, but are very severe diseases with high lethalities. The fatality rates reported in different outbreaks ranged from 24–100%. In addition, sero-surveys conducted have shown different seropositivity for both Ebola and Marburg viruses. We aimed to use a meta-analysis approach to estimate the case fatality and seroprevalence rates of these filoviruses, providing vital information for epidemic response and preparedness in countries affected by these diseases. Published literature was retrieved through a search of databases. Articles were included if they reported number of deaths, cases, and seropositivity. We further cross-referenced with ministries of health, WHO and CDC databases. The effect size was proportion represented by case fatality rate (CFR) and seroprevalence. Analysis was done using the metaprop command in STATA. The weighted average CFR of Ebola virus disease was estimated to be 65.0% [95% CI (54.0–76.0%), I2 = 97.98%] whereas that of Marburg virus disease was 53.8% (26.5–80.0%, I2 = 88.6%). The overall seroprevalence of Ebola virus was 8.0% (5.0%–11.0%, I2 = 98.7%), whereas that for Marburg virus was 1.2% (0.5–2.0%, I2 = 94.8%). The most severe species of ebolavirus was Zaire ebolavirus while Bundibugyo Ebolavirus was the least severe. The pooled CFR and seroprevalence for Ebola and Marburg viruses were found to be lower than usually reported, with species differences despite high heterogeneity between studies. Countries with an improved health surveillance and epidemic response have lower CFR, thereby indicating need for improving early detection and epidemic response in filovirus outbreaks.

8 July 2019 in BMC Veterinary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SOSylvester Ochwo
Sylvester Ochwo
Kimberly VanderWaalKimberly VanderWaal
Kimberly VanderWaal
AMAnna Munsey
Anna Munsey
JNJoseph Nkamwesiga
Joseph Nkamwesiga
CNChristian Ndekezi
Christian Ndekezi
FMFrank Norbert Mwiine
Frank Norbert Mwiine
Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is a transboundary cattle disease caused by a Capripoxvirus of the family Poxviridae. In Uganda, documented information on the epidemiology of the disease is rare and there is no nationwide control plan, yet LSD is endemic. This study set out to investigate the seroprevalence of lumpy skin disease and determine the risk factors for LSD seropositivity, by carrying out a cross-sectional study in 21 districts of Uganda. A total of 2,263 sera samples were collected from 65 cattle herds and an indirect ELISA was used to screen for lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) antibodies. We used univariable and multivariable mixed effect logistic regression models to identify risk factors for LSD seropositivity. The overall animal and herd-level seroprevalences were 8.7% (95% CI: 7.0–9.3) and 72.3% (95% CI: 70.0–80.3), respectively. Animal-level seroprevalence in Central region (OR = 2.13, p = 0.05, 95% CI: 1.10–4.64) was significantly different from the Northern region (Reference) and Western region (OR = 0.84, p = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.39–1.81). Management type, sex, age, mean annual precipitation > 1000 mm, and drinking from communal water sources were statistically significant risk factors for occurrence of anti-LSDV antibodies in cattle. Breed, region, herd size, contact with buffalo and other wildlife and introduction of new cattle did not have a statistically significant association with being positive for LSDV. We report a high herd-level LSDV seroprevalence in Uganda with a moderate animal-level seroprevalence. Cattle with the highest risk of LSD infection in Uganda are those in fenced farms, females > 25 months old, in an area with a mean annual rainfall > 1000 mm, and drinking from a communal water source.

11 September 2017 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNLuke Nyakarahuka
Luke Nyakarahuka
ESEystein Skjerve
Eystein Skjerve
DNDaisy Nabadda
Daisy Nabadda
DSDoreen Chilolo Sitali
Doreen Chilolo Sitali
CMChisoni Mumba
Chisoni Mumba
CKClovice Kankya
Clovice Kankya
Uganda has reported five (5) Ebola virus disease outbreaks and three (3) Marburg virus disease outbreaks from 2000 to 2016. Peoples’ knowledge and attitude towards Ebola and Marburg virus disease impact on control and prevention measures especially during outbreaks. We describe knowledge and attitude towards Ebola and Marburg virus outbreaks in two affected communities in Uganda to inform future outbreak responses and help in the design of health education and communication messages. The study was a community survey done in Luweero, Ibanda and Kamwenge districts that have experienced outbreaks of Ebola and Marburg virus diseases. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire and triangulated with qualitative participatory epidemiology techniques to gain a communities’ knowledge and attitude towards Ebola and Marburg virus disease. Out of 740 respondents, 48.5% (359/740) were categorized as being knowledgeable about Ebola and Marburg virus diseases, whereas 60.5% (448/740) were having a positive attitude towards control and prevention of Ebola and Marburg virus diseases. The mean knowledge and attitude percentage scores were 54.3 (SD = 23.5, 95%CI = 52.6–56.0) and 69.9 (SD = 16.9, 95%CI = 68.9–71.1) respectively. People educated beyond primary school were more likely to be knowledgeable about Ebola and Marburg virus disease than those who did not attain any formal education (OR = 3.6, 95%CI = 2.1–6.1). Qualitative data revealed that communities describe Ebola and Marburg virus diseases as very severe diseases with no cure and they believe the diseases spread so fast. Respondents reported fear and stigma suffered by survivors, their families and the broader community due to these diseases. Communities in Uganda affected by filovirus outbreaks have moderate knowledge about these diseases and have a positive attitude towards practices to prevent and control Ebola and Marburg viral diseases. The public health sector should enhance this community knowledge gap to empower them more by supplying educational materials for epidemic preparedness in future using appropriate communication channels as proposed by the communities. Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) and Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) are caused by a family of viruses known as Filoviruses. When they occur, they cause high lethality among infected people, which causes panic to the population, as well as interfering with the health care delivery system, especially in developing countries. Usually, at the beginning of these infections, the affected communities tend to think that witchcraft or some bad luck has befallen their community. Because of limited knowledge about these diseases, it becomes hard for local authorities to institute control and prevention measures. We administered a questionnaire to individual participants and held focus group discussions to help us tease out the communities’ understanding of these diseases. We found that people have moderate knowledge about EVD and MVD, and a positive attitude towards the prevention and control measures instituted by health authorities in Uganda. However, they still reported stigma subjected to the survivors of these diseases and affected families at large. EVD still causes much fear which drives some of the irrational actions by communities during outbreaks. Communities highlighted early sensitization as a means of controlling outbreaks. We recommend the findings in this paper to public health authorities in epidemic-prone countries like Uganda to aid in control and epidemic preparedness of filovirus outbreaks.

1 January 2012 in Veterinary World
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDennis Muhanguzi
Dennis Muhanguzi
VLVincent Lutwama
Vincent Lutwama
FMFrank Norbert Mwiine
Frank Norbert Mwiine

3 April 2020 in Parasites & Vectors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDennis Muhanguzi
Dennis Muhanguzi
JBJoseph Byaruhanga
Joseph Byaruhanga
WAWilson Amanyire
Wilson Amanyire
CNChristian Ndekezi
Christian Ndekezi
SOSylvester Ochwo
Sylvester Ochwo
FJFrans Jongejan
Frans Jongejan
Background: Rhipicephalus microplus, an invasive tick species of Asian origin and the main vector ofBabesiaspecies, is considered one of the most widespread ectoparasites of livestock. The tick has spread from its native habitats on translocated livestock to large parts of the tropical world, where it has replaced some of the local populations ofRhipicephalus decoloratusticks. Although the tick was reported in Uganda 70 years ago, it has not been found in any subsequent surveys. This study was carried out to update the national tick species distribution on livestock in Uganda as a basis for tick and tick-borne disease control, with particular reference toR. microplus.Methods: The study was carried out in Kadungulu, Serere district, south-eastern Uganda, which is dominated by small scale livestock producers. All the ticks collected from 240 cattle from six villages were identified microscopically. FiveR. microplusspecimens were further processed for phylogenetic analysis and species confirmation.Results: The predominant tick species found on cattle wasRhipicephalus appendiculatus(86.9 %;n= 16,509). Other species found wereAmblyomma variegatum(7.2 %;n= 1377),Rhipicephalus evertsi(2.3 %;n= 434)andR. microplus(3.6 %;n= 687). Phylogenetic analysis of the12SrRNA,16SrRNA and ITS2 gene sequences ofR. microplusconfirmed the morphological identification.Conclusions: It is concluded thatR. microplushas replacedR. decoloratusin the sampled villages in Kadungulu sub-county, since the latter was not any longer found in this area. There is currently no livestock movement policy in force in Uganda, which could possibly limit the further spread ofR. microplusticks. Future surveys, but also retrospective surveys of museum specimens, will reveal the extent of distribution ofR. microplusin Uganda and also for how long this tick has been present on livestock without being noticed.

6 June 2010 in Tropical Animal Health and Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CAChrisostom Ayebazibwe
Chrisostom Ayebazibwe
KTKirsten Tjørnehøj
Kirsten Tjørnehøj
FMFrank Norbert Mwiine
Frank Norbert Mwiine
VMVincent B. Muwanika
Vincent B. Muwanika
AOAnna Rose Ademun Okurut
Anna Rose Ademun Okurut
SASoren Alexandersen
Soren Alexandersen