Benjamin Mayer

Dr. Benjamin Mayer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in Journal of Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRebecca Halbgebauer
Rebecca Halbgebauer
CBChristian K. Braun
Christian K. Braun
SDStephanie Denk
Stephanie Denk
BMBenjamin Mayer
Benjamin Mayer
PCPaolo Cinelli
Paolo Cinelli
MHMarkus Huber-Lang
Markus Huber-Lang
Polytrauma (PT) is frequently associated with hemorrhagic shock (HS), which increases morbidity and mortality. Although various aspects of HS have been addressed in PT patients, the impact of an additional HS is largely unknown regarding the development of multiple organ dysfunction associated with disturbed glycocalyx and barrier function early after trauma. A prospective, longitudinal, mono-centered, observational study enrolling severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score, ISS=38.1±2.6) served for an in-depth analysis of blood (drawn on days 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5) and clinical data (up to 21days) of 30 patients who were then stratified into PT with and without HS. HS significantly enhanced signs of acute organ injury, assessed by increased serum concentrations of novel damage markers. Moreover, indicators of glycocalyx and tight-junction dysfunction were found in PT patients all of which were significantly enhanced in co-presence of HS. These markers revealed multiple significant correlations with specific barrier, fluid-balance, coagulation, inflammation, and clinical-outcome parameters. Strikingly, mucosa fragments, which affected clotting, could be detected in serum after PT/HS. The results point to HS as a main driver for glycocalyx and barrier breakdown and suggest novel tools for the monitoring of organ dysfunction in the early course after PT.

15 October 2021 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKSixten Körper
Sixten Körper
MWManfred Weiss
Manfred Weiss
DZDaniel Zickler
Daniel Zickler
TWThomas Wiesmann
Thomas Wiesmann
KZKai Zacharowski
Kai Zacharowski
HSHubert Schrezenmeier
Hubert Schrezenmeier
BACKGROUND. COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) has been considered a treatment option for COVID-19. This trial assessed the efficacy of a neutralizing antibody containing high-dose CCP in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support or intensive care treatment. METHODS. Patients (n = 105) were randomized 1:1 to either receive standard treatment and 3 units of CCP or standard treatment alone. Control group patients with progress on day 14 could cross over to the CCP group. The primary outcome was a dichotomous composite outcome of survival and no longer fulfilling criteria for severe COVID-19 on day 21. Results. The primary outcome occurred in 43.4% of patients in the CCP group and 32.7% in the control group (P = 0.32). The median time to clinical improvement was 26 days in the CCP group and 66 days in the control group (P = 0.27). The median time to discharge from the hospital was 31 days in the CCP group and 51 days in the control group (P = 0.24). In the subgroup that received a higher cumulative amount of neutralizing antibodies, the primary outcome occurred in 56.0% of the patients (vs. 32.1%), with significantly shorter intervals to clinical improvement (20 vs. 66 days, P < 0.05) and to hospital discharge (21 vs. 51 days, P = 0.03) and better survival (day-60 probability of survival 91.6% vs. 68.1%, P = 0.02) in comparison with the control group. Conclusion. CCP added to standard treatment was not associated with a significant improvement in the primary and secondary outcomes. A predefined subgroup analysis showed a significant benefit of CCP among patients who received a larger amount of neutralizing antibodies. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04433910. Funding. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (German Federal Ministry of Health): ZMVI1-2520COR802.

25 November 2016 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNLuke Nyakarahuka
Luke Nyakarahuka
CKClovice Kankya
Clovice Kankya
RKRandi Krontveit
Randi Krontveit
BMBenjamin Mayer
Benjamin Mayer
FMFrank Norbert Mwiine
Frank Norbert Mwiine
ESEystein Skjerve
Eystein Skjerve
Ebola and Marburg virus diseases are said to occur at a low prevalence, but are very severe diseases with high lethalities. The fatality rates reported in different outbreaks ranged from 24–100%. In addition, sero-surveys conducted have shown different seropositivity for both Ebola and Marburg viruses. We aimed to use a meta-analysis approach to estimate the case fatality and seroprevalence rates of these filoviruses, providing vital information for epidemic response and preparedness in countries affected by these diseases. Published literature was retrieved through a search of databases. Articles were included if they reported number of deaths, cases, and seropositivity. We further cross-referenced with ministries of health, WHO and CDC databases. The effect size was proportion represented by case fatality rate (CFR) and seroprevalence. Analysis was done using the metaprop command in STATA. The weighted average CFR of Ebola virus disease was estimated to be 65.0% [95% CI (54.0–76.0%), I2 = 97.98%] whereas that of Marburg virus disease was 53.8% (26.5–80.0%, I2 = 88.6%). The overall seroprevalence of Ebola virus was 8.0% (5.0%–11.0%, I2 = 98.7%), whereas that for Marburg virus was 1.2% (0.5–2.0%, I2 = 94.8%). The most severe species of ebolavirus was Zaire ebolavirus while Bundibugyo Ebolavirus was the least severe. The pooled CFR and seroprevalence for Ebola and Marburg viruses were found to be lower than usually reported, with species differences despite high heterogeneity between studies. Countries with an improved health surveillance and epidemic response have lower CFR, thereby indicating need for improving early detection and epidemic response in filovirus outbreaks.

10 June 2020 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAnne-Kathrin Lutz
Anne-Kathrin Lutz
SPStefanie Pfaender
Stefanie Pfaender
BIBerra Incearap
Berra Incearap
VIValentin Ioannidis
Valentin Ioannidis
Ilaria OttonelliIlaria Ottonelli
Ilaria Ottonelli
TBTobias M. Böckers
Tobias M. Böckers
Heterozygous mutations of the gene encoding the postsynaptic protein SHANK3 are associated with syndromic forms of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). One of the earliest clinical symptoms in SHANK3-associated ASD is neonatal skeletal muscle hypotonia. This symptom can be critical for the early diagnosis of affected children; however, the mechanism mediating hypotonia in ASD is not completely understood. Here, we used a combination of patient-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), Shank3Δ11(−/−) mice, and Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMDS) muscle biopsies from patients of different ages to analyze the role of SHANK3 on motor unit development. Our results suggest that the hypotonia in SHANK3 deficiency might be caused by dysfunctions in all elements of the voluntary motor system: motoneurons, neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), and striated muscles. We found that SHANK3 localizes in Z-discs in the skeletal muscle sarcomere and co-immunoprecipitates with α-ACTININ. SHANK3 deficiency lead to shortened Z-discs and severe impairment of acetylcholine receptor clustering in hiPSC-derived myotubes and in muscle from Shank3Δ11(−/−) mice and patients with PMDS, indicating a crucial role for SHANK3 in the maturation of NMJs and striated muscle. Functional motor defects in Shank3Δ11(−/−) mice could be rescued with the troponin activator Tirasemtiv that sensitizes muscle fibers to calcium. Our observations give insight into the function of SHANK3 besides the central nervous system and imply potential treatment strategies for SHANK3-associated ASD.

1 May 2020 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGalia S. Moran
Galia S. Moran
JKJasmine Kalha
Jasmine Kalha
Annabel Mueller-StierlinAnnabel Mueller-Stierlin
Annabel Mueller-Stierlin
RKReinhold Kilian
Reinhold Kilian
SKSilvia Krumm
Silvia Krumm
BPBernd Puschner
Bernd Puschner
Background: Peer support is an established intervention involving a person recovering from mental illness supporting others with mental illness. Peer support is an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at multiple levels, including service user outcomes (psychosocial and clinical), peer support worker outcomes (work role and empowerment), service outcomes (cost-effectiveness and return on investment), and implementation outcomes (adoption, sustainability and organisational change).Methods: UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of using peer support in developing empowering mental health services (UPSIDES) at four measurement points over 1 year (baseline, 4-, 8- and 12-month follow-up), with embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- and low-income countries (Germany, UK, Israel, India, Uganda and Tanzania). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N = 558;N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (using the Empowerment Scale), hope (using the HOPE scale), recovery (using Stages of Recovery) and health and social functioning (using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect and the implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support.Discussion: The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention in different cultural, organisational and resource settings. By actively involving and empowering service users, UPSIDES will move mental health systems toward a recovery orientation, emphasising user-centredness, community participation and the realisation of mental health as a human right.Trial registration: ISRCTN,ISRCTN26008944. Registered on 30 October 2019.

14 February 2015 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKlaus Kramer
Klaus Kramer
UKUwe Knippschild
Uwe Knippschild
BMBenjamin Mayer
Benjamin Mayer
KBKira Bögelspacher
Kira Bögelspacher
HSHanno Spatz
Hanno Spatz
MSMichael Schmieder
Michael Schmieder
Risk classification and prediction of prognosis in GIST is still a matter of debate. Data on the impact of age and gender as potential confounding factors are limited. Therefore we comprehensively investigated age and gender as independent risk factors for GIST. Two independent patient cohorts (cohort I, n = 87 [<50 years]; cohort II, n = 125 [≥50 years]) were extracted from the multicentre Ulmer GIST registry including a total of 659 GIST patients retrospectively collected in 18 collaborative German oncological centers. Based on demographic and clinicopathological parameters and a median follow-up time of 4.3 years (range 0.56; 21.33) disease-specific-survival (DSS), disease-free-survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. GIST patients older than fifty years showed significantly worse DSS compared to younger patients (p = 0.021; HR = 0.307, 95% CI [0.113; 0.834]). DSS was significantly more favorable in younger female GIST patients compared with elderly females (p = 0.008). Female gender resulted again in better prognosis in younger patients (p = 0.033). Patient age (<50 years) and female gender were significantly associated with a more favourable prognosis in GIST. Extended studies are warranted to confirm our clinical results and to elucidate underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.