Kyeongmin Byeon

Prof. Kyeongmin Byeon

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKyeongmin Byeon
Kyeongmin Byeon
HKHye Re Kim
Hye Re Kim
SPSeung-Jung Park
Seung-Jung Park
YPYoung Jun Park
Young Jun Park
JCJihoon Choi
Jihoon Choi
JKJune Soo Kim
June Soo Kim
Until recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAp) has mostly been performed using lumen-less fixed screw leads. There are limited data on LBBAp with conventional style-driven extendable screw-in (SDES) leads, particularly data performed by operators with no previous experience with LBBAp procedures. In total, 42 consecutive patients undergoing LBBAp using SDES leads and newly designed delivery sheaths (LBBAp group) were compared with those treated with conventional right ventricular pacing (RVp) for atrioventricular block (RVp group, n = 84) using propensity score matching (1:2 ratio). The LBBAp was successful in 83% (35/42) of patients, with satisfactory pacing thresholds (0.8 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms). In the LBBAp group, the mean paced-QRS duration obtained during RV apical pacing (173 ± 18 ms) was significantly reduced by LBBAp (116 ± 14 ms, p < 0.001). Compared with the RVp group, the LBBAp group showed more physiological pacing, suggested by a much narrower paced-QRS duration (116 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 21 ms, p < 0.001). The pacing threshold was comparable in both groups. The LBBAp group revealed stable pacing thresholds for 6.8 ± 4.8 months post-implant and no serious complications including lead dislodgement or septal perforation. The novel approach of LBBAp using SDES leads and the new dedicated pre-shaped delivery sheaths was effectively and safely performed, even by inexperienced operators with LBBAp procedures.

1 January 2020 in Infection & Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChoongman Lee
Choongman Lee
MAMi Young Ahn
Mi Young Ahn
KBKyeongmin Byeon
Kyeongmin Byeon
JCJae-Phil Choi
Jae-Phil Choi
CHChorom Hahm
Chorom Hahm
DODong Hyun Oh
Dong Hyun Oh
Lee C, et al. Infect Chemother. 2020 Sep;52(3):369-380. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2020.52.3.369

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJu Hyeon Kim
Ju Hyeon Kim
JCJung-Joon Cha
Jung-Joon Cha
SLSubin Lim
Subin Lim
JAJungseok An
Jungseok An
MKMi-Na Kim
Mi-Na Kim
TATae Hoon Ahn
Tae Hoon Ahn
Although lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels following acute myocardial infarction (MI) is the cornerstone of secondary prevention, the attainment of recommended LDL-C goals remains suboptimal in real-world practice. We sought to investigate recurrent adverse events in post-MI patients. From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institutes of Health registry, a total of 5049 patients with both measurements of plasma LDL-C levels at index admission and at the one-year follow-up visit were identified. Patients who achieved an LDL-C reduction ≥ 50% from the index MI and an LDL-C level ≤ 70 mg/dL at follow-up were classified as target LDL-C achievers. The primary endpoint was a two-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), including cardiovascular mortality, recurrent MI, and ischemic stroke. Among the 5049 patients, 1114 (22.1%) patients achieved the target LDL-C level. During a median follow-up of 2.1 years, target LDL-C achievers showed a significantly lower incidence (2.2% vs. 3.5%, log-rank p = 0.022) and a reduced adjusted hazard of MACCE (0.63; p = 0.041). In patients with acute MI, achieving a target LDL-C level was associated with a lower incidence and a reduced hazard of recurrent clinical events. These results highlight the need to improve current practices for managing LDL-C levels in real-world settings.

6 September 2022 in Yonsei Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMoonki Jung
Moonki Jung
KBKyeongmin Byeon
Kyeongmin Byeon
KKKi-Woon Kang
Ki-Woon Kang
YPYae Min Park
Yae Min Park
YHYouMi Hwang
YouMi Hwang
CIClinical Survey on Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (CS-SPAF) Investigators
Clinical Survey on Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (CS-SPAF) Investigators
Jung M, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2022 Oct;63(10):892-901. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.0157

1 January 2023 in Korean Circulation Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEun Jeong Cho
Eun Jeong Cho
KBKyeongmin Byeon
Kyeongmin Byeon
YJYoung-Hoon Jeong
Young-Hoon Jeong
Cho EJ, et al. Korean Circ J. 2023 Nov;53:e88. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2023.0287

1 October 2022 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSeung Yong Shin
Seung Yong Shin
MJM Jung
M Jung
KKK Kang
K Kang
KBKyeongmin Byeon
Kyeongmin Byeon
The balance of stroke risk reduction and potential hemorrhagic risk associated with anti-thrombotic treatment (ATT) remain unclear in Korean atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with low to intermediate stroke risk, defined as non-gender CHA2DS2-VASc score 0–1. The net clinical benefit (NCB) analysis of ATT may be helpful to guide stroke prevention strategy in AF patients with non-gender CHA2DS2-VASc score 0–1. This Korean multi-center cohort study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes with single antiplatelet (SAPT), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in non-gender CHA2DS2-VASc score 0–1 and further stratified by biomarker-based ABCD score (Age [≥60 years], B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] or N-terminal pro-BNP [≥300 pg/ml], Creatinine clearance [<50 ml/min/1.73 m2], and Dimension of the left atrium [≥45 mm]). The primary outcome was the NCB of ATT including thromboembolic and major bleeding events. We included 2465 patients (56.2±9.5 years; female, 665 [27.0%]) followed-up for 4.0±2.8 years, of whom 661 (26.8%) were treated with SAPT; 423 (17.2%) with VKA; and 1040 (42.2%) with NOAC. In comparison with no treatment, only NOAC demonstrated a positive tendency for stroke prevention (NOAC, NCB 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.40 to 2.10; SAPT, NCB −0.31, 95% CI −1.48 to 1.40; and VKA, NCB −1.26, 95% CI −2.97 to 0.67). With detailed risk stratification with ABCD score, NOAC showed a significant NCB for stroke prevention compared with SAPT and VKA (SAPT vs. NOAC, NCB 1.6, 95% CI 0.26–3.50; VKA vs. NOAC, NCB 1.96, 95% CI 0.47–4.16) in patients with ABCD score ≥1. ATT failed to show NCB in patients with truly low stroke risk defined as ABCD score=0. Korean AF cohort with low to intermediate stroke risk indicates that, in comparison with no ATT, only ATT with NOAC showed marginal NCB. With further risk stratification by ABCD score, NOAC showed significant advantages over other ATTs (VKA or SAPT) in patients with ABCD ≥1. Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency Figure 1